About one year ago, China started circulating pictures of people dropping dead in the streets, hazmat suits, and government welding people into their homes – in order to stop the spread of some “novel” virus “which no one had immunity to.”
I haven’t seen any people dead in the streets or any hazmat suits, but many western politicians immediately fell in love with the idea of locking people in their homes and are still doing it nine months later. The lockdowns were originally sold as “two weeks to flatten the curve.”
There was never any reason to believe this virus was a huge threat to the general population. Early data out of Italy showed that the virus was killing mainly very old and sick people, most of whom would have likely died in the next couple of years under any circumstances.
Dr. Fauci said that the overwhelming majority of the population can fight off the virus by themselves, but now he says 90% of the population needs to get Bill Gates’ injection.
I’ve been pointing out since day one that nothing about the government virus response or Fauci’s drivel made any sense, and that government action looked just like an implementation of the Green New Deal. And now politicians are becoming quite open that is exactly what this is about.
A number of climatologists, whose job it is to keep an eye on long?term weather changes, have lately been predicting deterioration of the benign climate to which we have grown accustomed. They point to signs both great (a steady global cooling trend since World War II) and quaint (the southward retreat from Nebraska of the warmth?loving armadillo) to support their claim that the coming years will feature colder, more erratic weather.
Some recent warnings, from reputable researchers in Japan, Europe and the U.S., have so worried policy?makers that last January certain scientists at a meeting of the National Academy of Sciences proposed the evacuation of some six million people from their parched homelands in the Sahel region of Africa.
