NOAA Data Tampering Since Last Year

15 Responses to NOAA Data Tampering Since Last Year

1. omanuel says:

   September 18, 2015 at 1:06 pm

   Thank you, Steven, for documenting continuing climate fraud.

   Despite their resistance to reality, there is NEW HOPE if other AGW sites endorse the need for rigorous honesty in science:

   http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/16/david-attenborough-backs-huge-apollo-clean-energy-research-plan

   https://businessblogsbysamtumblin.wordpress.com/2015/09/18/david-attenborough-backs-huge-apollo-style-clean-energy-research-plan/

   https://jpratt27.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/17-global-goals-auspol-canningvotes-yeswecanning/

   Other issues can be resolved if we can agree “Stalin’s Lock-Step Science“ is flawed and work together to correct it.

   https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/

   Reply
2. rah says:

   September 18, 2015 at 1:35 pm

   Chart source link?

   Reply
   • Gail Combs says:

     September 18, 2015 at 1:51 pm

     Beneath the chart: (It is NOAA)

     This year’s version : 201508.gif (813×525)

     Last year’s version : 201408.gif (813×525)

     Reply
3. Ron Clutz says:

   September 18, 2015 at 1:38 pm

   US academics missed their target.

   https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/09/18/anti-racketeering-initiative/

   Reply
   • Gail Combs says:

     September 18, 2015 at 1:54 pm

     If we actually had courts that were not as crooked as a dog’s hindleg we could use RICO against several groups like Greenpeace, WWF, Sierra Club, NOAA, NASA, IPCC…..

     Reply
4. Robertv says:

   September 18, 2015 at 2:12 pm

   And your tax dollars (and a lot of money printing) are paying for this .

   Reply
   • Gail Combs says:

     September 18, 2015 at 2:59 pm

     “a lot of money printing” = Wage devaluation and price inflation. A very subtle means of shearing the Sheeple.

     With all the hidden taxes and inflation, I wonder just how much of our wealth we actually get to keep. 20%, 10% 5 %?

     Reply
     • omanuel says:

       September 18, 2015 at 3:35 pm

       “Stalin’s science“ documents seventy years (1945-2015) of government DECEIT to try to hide from the public the solar pulsar that:

       1. Made our chemical elements

       2. Birthed the solar system 5 Ga ago

       3. Sustained the origin and evolution of life on Earth after -3.5 Ga ago, and

       4. Still sustains every atom, life and planet in the solar system today.

       No scientist has openly challenged those conclusions since they were posted for comment and discussion on:

       Dropbox
       ResearchGate
       Brittius, etc.
       https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/

       Conclusion: It is time to accept reality and the influence of the solar pulsar in everyday events on Earth.

       Reply
       • omanuel says:

         September 18, 2015 at 8:36 pm

         Professor Curry posted this copy of a letter from twenty climate “scientists,” including several members of the US National Acsdemy of Sciences, trying to end the debate they could not win and are afraid to openly debate:

         http://www.iges.org/letter/LetterPresidentAG.pdf

         What a sad, sad state of affairs for science and all society, worldwide

         With deep regrets,
         Oliver K. Manuel
     • Robertv says:

       September 18, 2015 at 4:42 pm

       Does it matter ? Every form of direct taxation is slavery even a flat tax. So does it matter how much wealth a slave can have ?

       Reply
     • Robertv says:

       September 18, 2015 at 4:46 pm

       A bird in a cage is trapped even if it is made of gold.

       Reply
5. DD More says:

   September 18, 2015 at 5:23 pm

   But do they use Horoscope-thermometers like BoM does in Australian?

   In a 3 part post at Jo Nova –
   http://joannenova.com.au/2015/07/scandal-bom-thermometer-records-fiddled-by-month-mysterious-square-wave-pattern-discovered/
   http://joannenova.com.au/2015/09/scandal-part-3-bureau-of-meteorology-homogenized-the-heck-out-of-rural-sites-too/

   Firstly there were the Horoscope-thermometers — which need adjustments that are different for each calendar month of the year – up in December, down in January, up in February… These thermometers flip on Jan 1 each year from reading nearly 1°C too warm all of December, to being more than 1°C too cold for all of January. Then come February 1, they flip again. Somehow the BOM managed to unravel this bizarre pattern (cue X-files music) and figure out exactly what anti-horoscope-adjustments to use (and they were different in every city)

   Reply
6. Peter Orilia says:

   September 18, 2015 at 7:44 pm

   I have first-hand experience dealing with “scientists” at NOAA. I happened to have read an article where the word “rain forest” was continually used to denote “jungle”. Having gained certain expertise in this field when I wrote a report in school, I took it upon myself to correct the NOAA writer.

   I explained that those two words are not interchangeable at all. A “Rain forest” can only occur under a particular circumstance: Moisture is pushed up the windward slope of a mountain of a certain height, over the peak, condenses into clouds, and then precipitates over the leeward slope. There, and only there is where a rain forest can reside.

   It is obvious that “Rain Forest” sounds politically correct, but is instead false information. The NOAA writer never grasped the concept and insisted “That’s what everybody at NOAA thinks”.

   Founding father, Thomas Paine – author of “Common Sense – said it best: “A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right”

   Reply
7. Hifast says:

   September 28, 2015 at 3:28 pm

   Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented:
   NOAA historical databases continue to be manipulated.

   Reply
8. Canadian Climate Guy says:

   October 21, 2015 at 3:55 pm

   Reblogged this on Canadian Climate Guy.

   Reply