Obama has added over $4,000,000,000,000 to the debt – so rather than dealing with reality, he focuses on 0.0004 concentration CO2 as a threat.
Consequences of Severe Climate Change Outweigh Partisan Agendas
By Derek Palmer
Published on January 4, 2011
Public health and safety is not a partisan issue. Ensuring the welfare of American citizens is arguably the most important job of the federal government. Therefore, we should question why, when the Environmental Protection Agency sets out to regulate harmful greenhouse gasses, we let rhetorical attacks about economic devastation or job destruction influence the rational restriction of a proven health threat to not only U.S. citizens, but the entire world.
The Clean Air Act and 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA make the Obama administration legally responsible for protecting citizens from the harmful effects of greenhouse gasses and other pollutants. The upcoming EPA regulations are not a case of the president trying to force his agenda through a regulative agency when legislation has failed. Instead, this is a case of performing his obligation to protect health and safety through whichever agency is best equipped to do so.
Don’t know what ya’ll worried about. He’ll just print some more, and seen as most countries use the Dollar as reserve, they can’t afford for it to devalue so they’ll print some more and we’re all happy.
All it does is raise the prices of commodities which slows down economies. The greens love it and will vote him back in next time.
but all those green jobs will erase our debt…………
Obama has added over $4,000,000,000,000
Democrats and Republicans helped. They cannot be so dumb to not know the consequences of huge debt. So they must be doing it on purpose.
No, not this time. Republicans have done their damage in the past, but that $4t is all obama and democrats.
greenhouse gasses and other pollutants
If only we could get all those polluting greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere!
harmful greenhouse gasses
What planet is this guy living on???
So $4 trillion divided 100 million working stiffs is $40,000.00 per working stiff. The compelling economic question that needs to be answered is what benefit will you receive as a result of this incremental increase in government expansion and is it worth the $40,000.00 that each of you will be paying? Obama said he wanted to spread the wealth so who do you think got your $40,000.00?
Here’s a hint it wasn’t me.
He did of course……….
I think it’s .004% or 390 parts per million.
Right. 0.0004
It would be .04%, not .004% – the percentage removes 2 zeros John.
Yeah, it was early this am when I posted. My brain isn’t working. š
I know that routine! Do not ask me anything until after my first cup of cafeine! š
.0039% is 390 PPM so you were closer when you said .004% John.
Sorry, Phil J is correct at .039%
Sounds like an unauthorized power grab based on very flimsy science. Knowing the apathy of the American people, they will probably roll over and take it.
And this is what you get for the money:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGC7zRxo8k0
times have sure changed.
we now have to watch russian news to see what’s really happening!
First they came for Texas
http://www.heliogenic.net/2011/01/03/first-they-came-for-texas/
How the US has come to a standstill
both the debt and the carbon scam are about the same thing…taking money from those who work and giving to those who don’t
i.e.
The EPA and Corporate Welfare: More from the Climate-Government-Industrial Complex
http://www.independent.org/blog/index.php?p=9051
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704694004576019730082447432.html