http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=040-081
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=040-151
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Bob G on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bob G on “the science is absolutely certain”
- William on “the science is absolutely certain”
- conrad ziefle on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Christopher Witzel on “the science is absolutely certain”
- arn on “the science is absolutely certain”
- John Francis on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- John Francis on “the science is absolutely certain”
- arn on “the science is absolutely certain”
Presumably still experiencing post glacial rebound.
That said, I’ve visited Narvik, an impressive fjord landscape.
It is surprising to maintain that large a rebound without some earthquakes in that area.
But…But…But You are cherry picking the data! If you use ONLY 2003-2005, you will see a very DANGEROUS rise in the sea level! you used ALL the data! How could you?