I love reading comments from alarmists who imagine that they know what they are talking about.
In other words, the Earth’s temperature regularly varies by 8C, and CO2 has nothing to do with it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on A Real Hockey Stick
- Disillusioned on Climate Destroying Shrimp
- Conrad Ziefle on “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
- Petit_Barde on Doubling Energy Costs
- arn on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
Ever hear of volcanism, Milankovitch cycles, axial tilt, etc that were drivers of PAST climate change?
Natural variability in 10 times larger than the claimed human signal. Only a moron would attempt to draw conclusions from a S/N ratio of 0.1. What does that make you?
Doomed. A person who reaches conclusions based on signal trends from decades…not too long…not too short…careful now! You’ll ruin the cake! No time to learn from history, too busy repeating it.
Point me to a paper that defines the drivers of NV and their relative contributions to climate variability and I will review it. But in the meantime, most atmospheric scientists say that CO2 contributes approximately to 15% to the greenhouse gas warming or between 3 to 5C. An increase of 40% of this gas through man-made actions coupled with wholesale destruction of carbon sinks would lead a reasonable person to conclude that we are seriously fucking up our climate.
Radiative transfer models show almost no change in downwelling longwave radiation across the range of historic CO2 variability.
If CO2 “traps” radiation thus increasing temperatures we have the interesting paradox of something heating itself up by radiating less – that is by cooling.
This phenomenum has never been demonstrated and until it is catagorically shown to be plausible we should all be sceptical of the “greenhouse effect”.
Climate science is based on the non-reality that the Sun shines 24 hours a day at one-quarter power and supplies insufficient energy to heat the Earth to more than minus 18 C.
That is simply wrong – averages mean nothing.
The minus 18 C is another spurious figure with little basis in reality.
This massive propaganda offensive by the green crowd following Sandy, plus the love fest with Christie and Obama probably decided the election. What a bad break for the USA! But the unwillingness of the Republicans to compromise on the budget was a self inflicted wound. Even Reagan would compromise. Fair or unfair, the label on the Republicans as obstructionist carried some weight.
I love his statement that now CO2 is clearly leading temperature. It works so well, rising while the temperature is doing nothing or even cooling? Yep, it’s got to be the cause. Is he in Colorado on a Rocky Mountain high?
What budget, there was no budget to compromise, Had the Democrats produced a budget then compromise might have happened.
Here’s a post I made on Facebook the other day. I’ve had a couple of positive responses so far.
How about a coordinated worldwide party – fueled by carbonated alcoholic beverages – for all ‘climate deniers’ as soon as atmospheric CO2 goes above 400ppm?
“…us being humans, not plants, not animals…”
They are brilliant!
Another new Greenland record cold minus 56 C.
http://ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynres?lang=en&ind=04416&ano=2012&mes=11&day=9&hora=12&min=0&ndays=30