Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
Look, everybody, someone should have spearheaded a major advertising campaign to change public opinion about climate change. It would have worked because 1) the arguments are on are side and most of the public doesn’t know these argumetns, and 2) conservatives are fired up about the agw issue and would have donated huge $ to promote the self-fianancing anti-AGW ad campaign.
Changing opinon on climate change could have made a big difference in this campaign, not just in the presidential race, but in the senate and house races also. A huge number of Dem candidates, including O, would have been hurt if public opinion was momved a notch or two against climate change. And look at Sandy, O appears to have gotten a bump not just because he appeared presidential to some, but also because on the margins it reinforced his climate change message. PACS have spent a $billion or whatever on these campaigns. Why did’t we spend just a fraction of that to change the foundation of public opinion with regard to climate chagne? Do it in 2013! I’ll try, but I won’t have the time etc to do it. Someone else do it. Again, just get started with an effective message, and donations will roll in. It will be self-financing!
Obama still has a lot of work to do – 4 more years will barely be enough.
After all, there are still over 260 million people in America who are NOT on food stamps.
Only $3.00 for the pamphlet. Those commies really know how to bend the cost curve downward. Of course, they are on backorder.
“The Dead Always Vote Democrat”
http://www.amazon.com/The-Dead-Always-Vote-Democrat/dp/0988271427
The Dead always vote for the Brain-Dead.
Who’d a thunk it?
The Democrats always awaken the dead to have them vote early and often!
Dunno if you’ve seen this, food for thought.
http://www.themoneyparty.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Republican-Primary-Election-Results-Amazing-Statistical-Anomalies_V2.1.pdf
If this doesn’t convince you of Obama’s communist roots, I don’t know what will.