As Bishop Hill points out, in two years there won’t be a child on Earth who has experienced global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on “Why Do You Resist?”
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Mike Peinsipp on “Why Do You Resist?”
Or the Scientific Method.
No one below the age of 30 today knows what the Scientific Method is unless they were taught by their parents! They have been exposed to the Pseudo Scientific methods since they were born.
This 18 year pattern means nothing. The only 18 year pattern to mean anything was the period from 1980-1998, the only period of the last 72 years to show appreciable warming. The other 54 years showing no warming do not fit the peer reviewed settled science and thus do not count.
True!
Fair point well made.