Elections Have Consequences

Obama and Biden have devoted the last 4-1/2 months to lavish vacations at taxpayer expense, dividing America, increasing the debt, building up a massive paramilitary, demonizing everyone who disagrees with their madness, and destroying the Bill of Rights.

Meanwhile, Paul Ryan has a plan to balance the budget.

“The crucial question isn’t how we balance the budget – it’s why,” Ryan told the Conservative Political Action Committee Conference. “The budget is a means to an end. We’re not balancing the budget as an accounting exercise. We’re not just trying to make the numbers add up. We are trying to improve people’s lives.”

Ryan, the House Budget Committee chairman, revealed his latest budget plan Tuesday, calling for $4.6 trillion in cuts over 10 years, including rolling back President Barack Obama’s health care law. Ryan said his plan would bring the budget into balance without raising taxes.

Paul Ryan touts budget plan at CPAC

Next time, perhaps Americans can elect people who don’t hate them.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Elections Have Consequences

  1. John S says:

    I hope we have another election. There is potential for a real or imagined, ‘naturally occurring’ or caused crisis which keeps BO as Pharoah. Happened once before with FDR didn’t it?

  2. Traitor in Chief says:

    Unless Americans aren’t in control of the election outcome….

    • Traitor in Chief says:

      Soros is accredited with stating: It isn’t the voters who decide an election; It’s the people who count the votes.

      • gator69 says:

        Yep. FOX reported on this years ago…

        “Since 2006 the Democracy Alliance, a left leaning influence group funded by George Soros among others, has had remarkable success in targeting and claiming Secretary of State’s offices in 11 of 13 critical states they targeted, including Ohio, Minnesota and Iowa.

        Called the Secretary of State Project (SOSP) its aim is to target and capture the obscure, often overlooked office and implement election rules changes that give democrats a better chance of winning a plurality. Among those changes that SOSP calls “election protection,” are a loosening of voter registration requirements and a lessening of efforts to prevent fraudulent voting, according to Matthew Vadum, a political analyst with the Capitol Research Center.”

      • phodges says:

        Soros is accredited with stating: It isn’t the voters who decide an election; It’s the people who count the votes.

        I think that was a principle of Stalin’s….

  3. jeremyp99 says:

    I’m reading Vol. 4 of Robert Caro’s quite magnificent bio of LBJ. A reading of that will demonstrate that Mr. Soros is correct.

    The LBJ bio poses an interesting question – can bad people do good things?

    Something I’ve been wondering. If Obama was white, would he be idolised as he is? I think not.

  4. jeremyp99 says:

    ps. I like the cut of Mr. Paul’s jib. Can we have him please?

  5. phodges says:

    But the election was for Romney….who’s only distinction from Obama was that he wanted to bomb Iran NOW

  6. David says:

    Obama lost almost 20% of his former 2008 votes! Crowds across the nation were almost twice as big for Romey as they were for McCain in 2008. The polls said that republicans would vote in larger numbers. On election day over three million less republicans showed up then did for McCain in 08. This makes no sense. Has anyone found a listing of which states had less republican votes. Was it the battleground states?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *