Most people would describe this trend as being horizontal.
But Mann and Marcott see it as being vertical. This is because their minds are rotated left by 90 degrees.
h/t to Tom Nelson and Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
- “We Are From The Government And We Are Here To Help”
Recent Comments
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Compassion For Terrorists
- arn on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Compassion For Terrorists
- Francis Barnett on Compassion For Terrorists
- arn on Compassion For Terrorists
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
Science advances one ‘horizontality’ at a time. 😉
With a negative slope! 😉
We have here a “horizon event”, leading into the center of a “green hole” – A place or thing into which money will disappear and is not expected to be seen again.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
“This is because their minds are rotated left by 90 degrees.”
– or maybe –
This is because their morality is rotated left by 90 degrees.
That spliced graph is classic eco-worrier junk science. You really couldn’t do better.
And all those with a vertical views are destroying the respect and reputations of all honest scientist that do not willfully play games with data. The “peer-reviewers” that pass such a mendacious reports without conscience, loss of reputation, or loss of income are making science nothing more than game-play for the big-money men.
These people calling themselves “scientists” are frauds that are costing everyone $Billions worldwide.
Priceless. That’s why I love this site – the sarcasm is dead on. “Rotated left” indeed … I’m still chuckling.
Orthogonal to reality, perhaps.