What they mean by “unprecedented” is “completely in the noise of natural variability.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Communist West Germany
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
Recent Comments
- arn on Communist West Germany
- William on Communist West Germany
- arn on Communist West Germany
- czechlist on Communist West Germany
- William on Earth On Fire
- Francis Barnett on Earth On Fire
- arn on Communist West Germany
- Luigi on Communist West Germany
- Luigi on Communist West Germany
- Bob G on Communist West Germany
Bishop Hill had a great post on this very issue. An apparent slam dunk on the “unprecedented” scam: http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2013/5/27/met-office-admits-claims-of-significant-temperature-rise-unt.html
The graph above strongly resembles the mating call of the Blue Footed Booby!
anyone that looks at that….and is afraid of warming…..is a moron
You see this one? Canadian Scientist Regenerate Long Frozen Arctic Plants
What she doesn’t say is that there was a medieval warm period on Ellesmere Island. Warmer than today. Warm enough that 4 different types of moss immigrated and colonised under what is now a glacier in a high Arctic mountain pass.
Thank-you Steve that puts the last 20, 30 60, or 100 years of temperature changes into perspective.
Why in the past when the cold was ‘extreem’ it didn’t stay cold or got colder and why when it was ‘extreem’ warm it didn’t get hotter? And don’t forget that what we call hot in the history of the Earth is cold.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/65_Myr_Climate_Change.png
The more i look at that graph, the more i think we are lucky in this day and age to have a “climate” as warm and generous as it is right now….
The EPICA “Dome C” ice cores show four more glaciation cycles. “Climate Scientists” now admit that these CO2 variations were driven by temperature changes. In a pathetic attempt to salvage something from the debacle, Jeff Severinghaus claims that CO2 provided “Amplification”:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/04/the-lag-between-temp-and-co2/
I have a little fun at Jeff’s discomfiture here:
http://diggingintheclay.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/the-dog-that-did-not-bark/
And an interesting paper from Canada puts the cause of the majority of recent warming down to CFCs releases.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1210/1210.6844.pdf