Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
…and Joe will be here in 3…..2……1 LOL
I wish I could get a little of that blue down here!
I see the butterflies flapping their wings in West Africa. You can expect a Hurricane to visit you any week now! 😉
hush yo mouth cracker!
Correction:
Hush yo mouff cracka! 😉
they didn’t teach ebonics back when I was in school
Steve – I follow your site daily and was hoping you might help out on a question I have. As you have shown over and over again past tempature reocrds have been adjusted often. Usually cooling the past and warming the recent present.
On climate audit there is an article about hind casting. I started wondering if there was more to the adjustments then trying to make it look like unprecedented warming is occurring.
Specifically I was wondering if anyone was tracking the many hind casts to see if they are getting more accurate as a result of the many adjustments to the tempature record versus better modeling assumption.
I was wondering if the adjustments to the temp records are also meant to better align the GCM hind casts in addition to trying to make the warming seem serious? In other words are they trying to increase the validity of their models by showing how well the hind cast match the adjusted historical temp record thus validating the GCMs.
Just a thought I had when looking at some hind cast charts at CA.
Hope that made sense Steve.
Thanks John
LOL! I had the exact same thought when I saw Steve Mac’s article.
We must be getting cynical in our old age. Can’t imagine why……..
Thanks for the reply anything, I think it is time for the skeptical experts to research all of the hind casts to see if the newer runs have started to correlate better then the older runs.
John
That’s a very good question!
I’ll go out on a limb and speculate that the only hind-cast data the models can or ever will match is the “massaged”/”adjusted” data.
No way any of the models will ever match the real historical data in a hind-cast. Any model that could match unadjusted historical temperature data would also show no reason to panic.
That would expose the alarmisim as a total fraud and could cause a loss of government climate studies funding, so the results must always require “more investigation”.
Reblogged this on CraigM350.
Is there a link to this original pic, linked by Bastardi? I can’t find it anywhere. Thanks.
We’re enjoying modest warmth in the NW, tho not unusual. But one warm day, and the screeching will begin. Prepare yourselves!