Coal, Carbon Dioxide and Climate – View Article – NYTimes.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Climate Of 1923
- Market Volatility
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- arn on Market Volatility
- arn on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Bill on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Market Volatility
- conrad ziefle on Hottest Summer Ever
- stewartpid on Market Volatility
- William on Record CO2 Growth
- Greg in NZ on Hottest Summer Ever
Hello Steven,
when did the NYTimes publish this article, please?
Thank you by advance.
1977
So, we’ve had 34 years into the prediction of 20 feet sea level rise. So, it’s come up about 3.8′ since 1977?
I remember 1977 well.
To fill my R90S bike with petrol cost me around 17 cents a litre. Our rent was $30 per week.
A group of young guys riding motorcycles living together today in Queensland would see us locked up for association – apparently a crime under our new fascist State government.
Today petrol costs about $1.50 a litre and it is virtually impossible to rent a house for less than $400 per week.
So the rare commodity – petrol – has increased by less than a factor of ten while housing – a commodity which can be as plentiful as society chooses – exceeds the factor of ten.
What does this prove ?
Not much except that the price of petrol has not increased in line with the doom and gloom predictions despite the certain fact that global usage today far exceeds global usage in the 70’s.
The oil price shock of the early 70’s – supposedly driven by the realisation the world was running out of oil – was clearly a fraud !!
Sound familiar ??