Looks like alarmists have a little bit of catching up to do. 188 record minimums and 13 record maximums so far in 2014.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
Looks like a hockey stick to me….
Beat me to it. 😀
Whadda ya know, another hockey stick.
What was the ratio last year?
Last year was 1.15
First time since 1993.
2004 1997 1996
Looks like a sine wave. Colder in the 1900’s, warmer in the 30’s, cold through to the 70’s and warmer up to 2000. Likely to be cooler over next two to three decades, if we followed the wave, and don’t follow Warmist prophets of doom.
If you inverted the ratio how high would 2012 have been? Was it over 15:1?
Obviously needs adjusting.
If that data was in the BEST dataset it would be identified as a ‘breakpoint’ and thrown out due to ‘regional differences’.
2004 1997 1996
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/for-first-time-in-20-years-cold-records-may-beat-warm-in-u.s-16790
I guess it depends on what data set you’re looking at.
Climate Central uses a database heavily loaded with stations which were not in existence during the hot 1930’s and 1950’s. That allows them to slime their readers with misinformation.
Interesting how you can see the ~60 year cycle in Steve’s graph.