Looks like alarmists have a little bit of catching up to do. 188 record minimums and 13 record maximums so far in 2014.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
Looks like a hockey stick to me….
Beat me to it. 😀
Whadda ya know, another hockey stick.
What was the ratio last year?
Last year was 1.15
First time since 1993.
2004 1997 1996
Looks like a sine wave. Colder in the 1900’s, warmer in the 30’s, cold through to the 70’s and warmer up to 2000. Likely to be cooler over next two to three decades, if we followed the wave, and don’t follow Warmist prophets of doom.
If you inverted the ratio how high would 2012 have been? Was it over 15:1?
Obviously needs adjusting.
If that data was in the BEST dataset it would be identified as a ‘breakpoint’ and thrown out due to ‘regional differences’.
2004 1997 1996
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/for-first-time-in-20-years-cold-records-may-beat-warm-in-u.s-16790
I guess it depends on what data set you’re looking at.
Climate Central uses a database heavily loaded with stations which were not in existence during the hot 1930’s and 1950’s. That allows them to slime their readers with misinformation.
Interesting how you can see the ~60 year cycle in Steve’s graph.