Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
Request From The Climatologist In Chief
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Unfortunately, Steven, Climatologist in Chief knows more about climate than he knows about representing the citizens of this once great country.
The truth is slipping past all the official “keepers of knowledge” for wanna-be world tyrants. In summary,
We will go to the nucleus because that is where energy is stored as mass.
We will first get honest about nuclear forces so engineers and technicians can safely harvest and use that energy to benefit society:
1. Neutrons attract protons
2. Protons attract neutrons
3. Neutrons repel neutrons
4. Protons repel protons
5. Coulomb repulsion augments #4 and makes #4 much greater than #3, especially in heavy elements.
Nuclear structure and modes of decay reflect these five (1-5) forces.
In light elements, the core of the nucleus is n-p pairs. Excess neutrons exist on the nuclear surface. Neutron emission is a mode of decay for these.
Above about 150 amu, the nuclear structure changes because of high Coulomb repulsion. The n-p pairs move to the nuclear surface and the excess neutrons move to the core of the nucleus. Alpha-decay, emission of the He-4 nucleus (2 n-p pairs), is a common mode of decay for these.
These forces cannot hold together any nucleus above Bi-209 (83 protons and 126 neutrons). All heavier atoms are unstable.
Neutron-rich cores of even heavier atoms (Th, U, Np, Pu, etc) have high instabilities induced by neutron repulsion in the core. They may spontaneously fission. Or fission can be induced by adding one more neutron.
I suspect, but do not yet know, that energy from neutron repulsion could be harvested from many atoms above 150 amu by neutron-induced fission.
This information is also posted at http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/skunkworks-fusion/#comment-56544
Right next to his BC. 😉
Has anybody noticed Climatedepot is down?
Steve, the CIA should arrive at your door any day now.
Bastardi says the Eastern Seaboard is gonna get smacked again.