Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
Recent Comments
- arn on “what the science shows”
- Bob G on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Bob G on “what the science shows”
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Tel on “what the science shows”
- Solar Mutant Ninjaneer on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on Precision Taxation
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Earthquakes
- conrad ziefle on “what the science shows”
Request From The Climatologist In Chief
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Unfortunately, Steven, Climatologist in Chief knows more about climate than he knows about representing the citizens of this once great country.
The truth is slipping past all the official “keepers of knowledge” for wanna-be world tyrants. In summary,
We will go to the nucleus because that is where energy is stored as mass.
We will first get honest about nuclear forces so engineers and technicians can safely harvest and use that energy to benefit society:
1. Neutrons attract protons
2. Protons attract neutrons
3. Neutrons repel neutrons
4. Protons repel protons
5. Coulomb repulsion augments #4 and makes #4 much greater than #3, especially in heavy elements.
Nuclear structure and modes of decay reflect these five (1-5) forces.
In light elements, the core of the nucleus is n-p pairs. Excess neutrons exist on the nuclear surface. Neutron emission is a mode of decay for these.
Above about 150 amu, the nuclear structure changes because of high Coulomb repulsion. The n-p pairs move to the nuclear surface and the excess neutrons move to the core of the nucleus. Alpha-decay, emission of the He-4 nucleus (2 n-p pairs), is a common mode of decay for these.
These forces cannot hold together any nucleus above Bi-209 (83 protons and 126 neutrons). All heavier atoms are unstable.
Neutron-rich cores of even heavier atoms (Th, U, Np, Pu, etc) have high instabilities induced by neutron repulsion in the core. They may spontaneously fission. Or fission can be induced by adding one more neutron.
I suspect, but do not yet know, that energy from neutron repulsion could be harvested from many atoms above 150 amu by neutron-induced fission.
This information is also posted at http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/skunkworks-fusion/#comment-56544
Right next to his BC. 😉
Has anybody noticed Climatedepot is down?
Steve, the CIA should arrive at your door any day now.
Bastardi says the Eastern Seaboard is gonna get smacked again.