Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Request From The Climatologist In Chief
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Unfortunately, Steven, Climatologist in Chief knows more about climate than he knows about representing the citizens of this once great country.
The truth is slipping past all the official “keepers of knowledge” for wanna-be world tyrants. In summary,
We will go to the nucleus because that is where energy is stored as mass.
We will first get honest about nuclear forces so engineers and technicians can safely harvest and use that energy to benefit society:
1. Neutrons attract protons
2. Protons attract neutrons
3. Neutrons repel neutrons
4. Protons repel protons
5. Coulomb repulsion augments #4 and makes #4 much greater than #3, especially in heavy elements.
Nuclear structure and modes of decay reflect these five (1-5) forces.
In light elements, the core of the nucleus is n-p pairs. Excess neutrons exist on the nuclear surface. Neutron emission is a mode of decay for these.
Above about 150 amu, the nuclear structure changes because of high Coulomb repulsion. The n-p pairs move to the nuclear surface and the excess neutrons move to the core of the nucleus. Alpha-decay, emission of the He-4 nucleus (2 n-p pairs), is a common mode of decay for these.
These forces cannot hold together any nucleus above Bi-209 (83 protons and 126 neutrons). All heavier atoms are unstable.
Neutron-rich cores of even heavier atoms (Th, U, Np, Pu, etc) have high instabilities induced by neutron repulsion in the core. They may spontaneously fission. Or fission can be induced by adding one more neutron.
I suspect, but do not yet know, that energy from neutron repulsion could be harvested from many atoms above 150 amu by neutron-induced fission.
This information is also posted at http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/skunkworks-fusion/#comment-56544
Right next to his BC. 😉
Has anybody noticed Climatedepot is down?
Steve, the CIA should arrive at your door any day now.
Bastardi says the Eastern Seaboard is gonna get smacked again.