Why Antarctica will soon be the only place to live – literally – Environment – The Independent
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on Climate Attribution Model
Story about British government funding BBC propaganda campaign on climate.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2537886/BBCs-six-year-cover-secret-green-propaganda-training-executives.html
Isn’t the Wayback Machine great? I’ve used it a few times to find “scrubbed” posts and stories.
King did not say this – see the link to the Independent . His remarks were addressed to the House of Commons Energy & Climate Change Committee and were not framed from stupidity but deceit.
He was referring to the start of the Eocene Period (56 -33 mya) . Note the phrases ” massive reduction of life” which there was not – this was the age of huge mammal diversification- and “human life could not be sustained”, which was about 55m years too early . I doubt that human life could be sustained during the Jurassic! He talks about the absence of ice. This had been “normal” for far longer than the 60m years he quotes and would be for another 35m years after – despite a later reduction in CO2.
Geoffrey Lean, now displaying his gormlessness at the telegraph,naturally bought the BS but, worse, so did the committee – this was a step towards the catastrophic Climate Change Act.
King never publically refuted Lean’s “misinterpretation” of his evidence – though it was debated on the web.
So if Antarctica is running -60C now, and it warms up 4 degrees…..?…. yeah, I guess I can see how that would be the best place to live….for Mr. Lean.
We have thriving cities in places like Phoenix today. Most other places have a lot further to go than 4 degrees to arrive at a Phoenix-like environment.
Steve, remember this? ….some of the ways in which temps were fraudulently adjusted…
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html
Since it is clogged in ice (even along its edges) and not inhabitable even during summer, it is going to be a VERY long time before Antarctica is suitable for year round habitation.