NOAA lost 10% of their US temperature readings between 2012 and 2013. At the current rate of decline, the US will no longer have a climate by early next decade.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bob G on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Jack the Insider on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Conrad Ziefle on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- arn on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Historic Heatwave
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
This is very upsetting to me. As a tax-paying citizen, data is my property. I don’t care what political or personal ax somebody has to grind, they cannot mess with my property, according to The Constitution, anyhow.
If they just don’t report cold stations the average gets warmer. Figures don’t lie, but liars figure. Got it.
I don’t see any indication that there is bias in the disappearing data.
Since the science has been settled, why would us flat earthers need more readings ?
Off topic: Maybe you can rebut the crap out of this: http://tamino.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/global-temperature-the-post-1998-surprise/
It’s like Invasion of the Body Snatchers in there.
The comment section on that tamino blog has no rebuttals from skeptics, it seems like a good-old-boy blog, a training blog for the mafiosa
The blog is called Open Minded what a joke. I posted this:
Mike Sanicola | January 31, 2014 at 12:43 pm | Reply
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
This page is unbelievable. The entire article is about how skeptics cherry pick 1998 to show lack of warming, but you try to disprove it by showing a chart starting in 1979, the end of the mini ice age. I’m kind of wondering, do you think starting in 1979 is cherry picking or not? Because I think you probably don’t.
I know this post won’t get past the “moderation” because you are much to Open Minded for that. This is science fraud, but you probably think this is science. The human mind is a terrible thing, that people can believe this bullshit.
For the true story of global warming, go to http://www.hyzercreek.com/hillofshizzle.htm
After editing my comment and making some BS “sticking out their tongues” comments, I posted this:
Mike Sanicola | January 31, 2014 at 3:12 pm | Reply
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Your reply is unsatisfactory. You use data from the 80?s and 90?s to prove that warming didn’t stop. That technique will always work, no matter how you do the stats, unless the current temp goes back to the 1979 temp. Duh.
You aren’t fooling anybody except yourself. CO2 levels in the atmosphere are skyrocketing, yet warming has stopped keeping pace with it. You tried saying the warming is going into the oceans, but that turned out to be wrong since the oceans are cooling.
Obviously, you will continue to say the world is warming, until the government stop paying you to say that.
LEAVE A REPLY
Most of us gave up at those sites long ago because we don’t like singing with the choir.
I refuse to go to the site and give them any traffic.
I have been banned from most of them, usually because I questioned why they ignore natural variability, and pointed out that there is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate.
My second comment didn’t get past moderation. I don’t know whether I’m banned now. I just assume Tamino is on the public dole.
It’s worse than that. NASA simply pencil-whips ocean temperatures to match their global warming theory. No kidding.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/OceanCooling/
“Rising sea level is one of the most serious consequences of global warming. In the past 50 years, sea level rose about 1.8 (plus or minus 0.3) millimeters a year. Satellite observations since 1993 indicate the pace has accelerated to about 3 millimeters per year. What’s driving the acceleration?”
The satellite data from 1993 to now shows no acceleration. http://www.hyzercreek.com/GLOBEsealevel.jpg It’s a straight line. What is causing the acceleration that doesn’t exist? That’s a real puzzle.
Hey Mike! Alarmists don’t like puzzles, they prefer to pretend they know everything.
The real 800 pound gorilla is natural variability. Any sane human being would first need to disprove NV, before declaring that man is responsible for any global climate changes. This has never been done. In spite of decades of ‘peer review’ by ‘thousands’ of the world’s ‘climate experts’ and mountains of cash, not once have the warmists ever even come close to disproving the most obvious answer.
My Earth studies began with years of geology classes, and taught me just how dynamic this planet can be. The ‘extreme’ and ‘unprecedented’ weather we have seen is nothing compared to what has come before. The alarmists make Chicken Little seem pragmatic.
And so should the CAGW Con.
Actually it may be gone by election time in 2016. (Now if only the Reboobs could give us something besides RINOs to vote for.)
It would seem while reports like the new Chinese Paper are saying ““Our analysis shows that “data homogenization for [temperature] stations moved from downtowns to suburbs can lead to a significant overestimate of rising trends of surface air temperature.”
TRANSLATION: The urban heat island effect [UHI] can result in a “significant” exaggeration of warming trends
Mother nature is saying the Climastrologists guessed wrong big time.
Steve Wilde and others are saying the Jets have been going ‘Loopy’ for the last decade or so making the Polar Vortex more frequent. This is substantiated by more NH snow. Blizzards killing livestock from North Dakota to Scotland to Tibet and snow in strange places like the Holy Land and mountains near the equator.
Meanwhile the EPA is aggressively pursuing its WAR on COAL. Only they miscalculated.
According to EPA, their modeling of Utility MACT and CSAPR indicates that these regulations will only shutter 9.5 GW of electricity generation capacity.
The EPA made a really big OOPS.
The Institute for Energy Research reports that closures of the coal fired plants that supply ~ 40% of the US electricity are coming mainly on the Eastern seaboard to the Midwest.
I guess nothing is immune from budget cuts, though I personally consider weather records as something sacred.
I’m working on an electricity monitoring system that takes readings every 15 minutes of 8 different variables. Amazing that in this day and age that the climate geniuses have decided that less is more. I guess it is when you have to fudge the data.
My sorry old eyes, when looking at the graph, see a decline in number of readings of over 20%!!
Same thing happening with ENSO monitoring system.
http://m.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/el-nino-tracking-system-in-pacific-ocean-faces-collapse-20140127-31iy3.html
And somewhat differently at BOM.
http://mobile.news.com.au/national/queensland/bureau-of-meteorology-says-limited-resources-to-blame-for-lower-frequency-of-cyclone-updates/story-fnii5v6w-1226814546483
If you like your climate data, you can keep your climate data!
Apparently, temperature readings are not a renewable resource, and we are past the peak–some would be tempted to write a book to advertise this apocalypse (“Peak Climate, The Hidden Bomb: What You Need To Know For Your Family To Survive!”). With Eric Barnes’s excellent comment in mind (“Amazing that in this day and age that the climate geniuses have decided that less is more”), I will just sigh ominously and say, it is worse than we thought (and I am shocked, shocked, of course). They must be recruiting 5th graders (10 year olds, that is).
The science is already in…no need for the propaganda I mean scientific equipment.
What is of interest to me is all of these sites could be modified to measure radiation as well as temperature, allowing the federal government to monitor, model and map radiation to allow for predictable and protective measures to be taken by Americans as the radiation from the HAARP/Stuxnet Fukushima Daiichi covert Sampson Option envelopes the northern hemisphere. Oh, well. Out of sight, out of mind.
Laughing.
I’ve been keeping meticulous temperature data since the beginning of this year and all numbers indicate a downward trend that is of significant concern. If I’m reading these numbers correct and these temperatures continue to trend downward then I fear the planet is heading towards an icy mass-extinction by the end of June. I’ve ran these numbers dozens of times and my math is solid. I’m using every resource at my disposal now to warn the world.
July and having a heat wave. June?
this is bullcrap, all this stuff keeps on happening but the politicians keep ignoring all of it (not going to call names *coughcoughrepublicanscoughcough* but they dont do anything about it because they this its a load of bull (probably it would cause them to lose money or something) and nothing changes because NO ONE GOES OUT AND VOTES!!!!!!! we wouldn’t be having this problem if people actually voted and made there opinions heard. there’s one party called the green party that i vote for because they realize this is all a problem and try doing something about it, but no one votes for them because not one pays any attention. we should all try and vote for the green party cause they know what to do