Dear bitter clinging, crusading, terrorist climate deniers.
Stop being so divisive and using offensive language, like “crap.”
Katherine Hayhoe is my favorite Christian Scientist.
BHO
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Ivan G Wainwright on Climate Engineering
- Russell Cook on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
Take a look at This site. http://www.terrawatts.com/
Thanks for your intriguing post, annieoakley:
“There is no energy supply problem, there is an energy distribution problem — and the emerging solution is a new world wide web of electricity.
Russian Version ??????? ?????? Chinese Version ? ??”
I have been expecting you. You are right. There is no energy problem. But Russia and China are still generating CO2, because they also failed to develop the source of energy that powers the Sun.
Thanks again, annieoakley, for the post.
Annie, Omanuel—I calculated that out about a year ago, using about 340 watts m-2 and about 70% hitting the surface and 1/4 of that considering the sphere and about one half of the 30% of land surface which is feasible and the number of joules used currently, and I got something quite different, I will get back the figure later when I have got the time.
Obama has good news and bad news for you this Easter.
The good news is that government scientists and advisers have come up with a solution to global warming.
The bad news is that everyone who doesn’t have a nuclear shelter is totally screwed.
Good news for society: The wannabe world dictators are totally powerless.
So enjoy Easter, and ignore the arrogant fools trying to play God !
Reply to Obama: Sorry, BO, you are on the wrong side of history now because the public knows . . .
Unreported CHAOS and FEAR of nuclear annihilation in Aug-Sept 1945 frightened and united world leaders into taking totalitarian control of the world in Oct 1945 by:
1. Uniting all Nations into the UN, and
2. Forbidding public knowledge of the energy that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki: “Teacher’s Supplement to Solar Energy”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Supplement.pdf
Barack Obama deserves pity as the last domino to fall in a seventy-year (1945-2015) succession.
Not a single government scientist is willing to step forward to defend Obama’s science by publicly addressing nine pages of precise experimental data that show: THE SUN IS THE PULSAR REMNANT OF THE SUPERNOVA THAT BIRTHED THE SOLAR SYSTEM
If you like your corrupt lying fascistic government, good, because you are keeping your corrupt lying fascistic government.
You could add “right wing” to the description – as nobody on the progressive left is offensive or divisive………but then that would be exclusive.
Surely you jest. What about the progressive left does anything but attempt to divide people, and I find that quite offensive. Income inequality, homophobes, war on women, science deniers, exploitative capitalism, and on and on. What unifying force comes from it? Anything, that doesn’t always just foster larger government, more control over the individual, and one-size fits all prescriptions. I hope you were being facetious.
I actually meant sarcastic satire – if that is possible.
The progressive phenomena may be impossible to satirize but we must keep trying until we have a mathematical proof that it can’t be done.
http://e273468a55383449143d-4769e1e8e4501fd5520bae6885765002.r94.cf1.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Easter-Bunny-to-President-Obama-Please-Let-It-Be-2016.jpg
Do Christian lives matter Skeeter?
NAIROBI, Kenya — Somali militants burst into a university in eastern Kenya on Thursday and killed nearly 150 students in the worst terrorist attack since the 1998 bombing of the United States Embassy here, laying bare the nation’s continuing vulnerability after years of battling Islamist extremism.
A small group of militants, most likely between four and 10, roved from dorm to dorm, separating Christian from Muslim students and killing the Christians, the authorities said. Students described being awakened before dawn by the sound of gunfire and fleeing for their lives as masked attackers closed in.
Officials said that by the time Kenyan commandos cornered and killed the attackers on an upper floor, 147 people lay dead.
http://news.sky.com/story/1457254/militants-kill-147-in-kenyan-university-attack
But it’s not a religious war, and has nothing to do with Islam.
The event was reported by the BBC but they went to great lengths to avoid mentioning the fact that the dead were selected and Christians, as is normal for the BBC
Yep. Heads up, sparky. Reality is tough. http://i.imgur.com/BKYf25b.jpg
Totally OT, but enjoy a little piece of ingenuity..
https://www.youtube.com/embed/1IV10M1RbEA?rel=0
Are these the 97% consensus? http://www.sciencealert.com/major-journal-publisher-admits-to-fabricating-peer-reviews
Probably so. The current level of corruption runs deep and carries along the majority of “top scientists.”
Very strong radioactive radiation, gamma probably reaches to the lower layers of the atmosphere.
http://oi58.tinypic.com/im84yd.jpg
By the way can see the lowest pressure over the polar circle (the darkest area).
Thanks, ren. Is this the correct conclusion?
1. In the first image at 05:00-06:00 GMT, strong radioactive radiation, probably gamma gamma rays from a solar flare reaches to the lower layers of the atmosphere.
2. In the second image at 11:00-12:00 GMT, there was no flare on the Sun and the radiation dose vanished.
Rather strong solar wind (lack of a strong flare).
http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/goes-xray-flux.gif
Click the graphic.
Feb 4, 2015 is NOT 2015-04-04
You can see the high speed solar protons.
http://umtof.umd.edu/pm/latest2day.gif
Gamma rays from a solar flare instantaneously heat the top of Earth’s atmosphere!
After flares takes only a few hours. Therefore, a more dangerous is the GCR, which rises instantly when the solar wind weakens.
Thanks, ren.
GCR – “galactic” cosmic rays actually come from the Sun’s pulsar core.
Please explain these intriguing data.
Wave radiation was gone.
http://sol.spacenvironment.net/raps_ops/current_files/rtimg/dose.15km.png
There was no flare on the Sun, therefore, reached from space the radiation.
Or maybe it’s fast solar electrons ?
Inverse Compton scattering – a collision of high-energy electrons with low energy photons, resulting in electron transfers some of its energy photon. This phenomenon finds practical application in the production of beams of high energy radiation or electron cooling. In astrophysics is believed to be the mechanism of X-rays and gamma example. Supernova explosions, as a result of collisions of high-energy electrons from the stars of the photons of the cosmic microwave background.
“Natural sources of gamma rays on Earth include gamma decay from naturally occurring radioisotopes such as potassium-40, and also as a secondary radiation from various atmospheric interactions with cosmic ray particles. Some rare terrestrial natural sources that produce gamma rays that are not of a nuclear origin, are lightning strikes and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes, which produce high energy emissions from natural high-energy voltages. Gamma rays are produced by a number of astronomical processes in which very high-energy electrons are produced. Such electrons produce secondary gamma rays by the mechanisms of bremsstrahlung, inverse Compton scattering and synchrotron radiation. A large fraction of such astronomical gamma rays are screened by Earth’s atmosphere and must be detected by spacecraft. Notable artificial sources of gamma rays include fission such as occurs in nuclear reactors, and high energy physics experiments, such as neutral pion decay and nuclear fusion.”
“Terrestrial thunderstorms: Thunderstorms can produce a brief pulse of gamma radiation called a terrestrial gamma-ray flash. These gamma rays are thought to be produced by high intensity static electric fields accelerating electrons, which then produce gamma rays by bremsstrahlung as they collide with and are slowed by atoms in the atmosphere. Gamma rays up to 100 MeV can be emitted by terrestrial thunderstorms, and were discovered by space-borne observatories. This raises the possibility of health risks to passengers and crew on aircraft flying in or near thunderclouds.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray
Omanuel click all images (actual data).
The NAIRAS model predicts atmospheric radiation exposure from galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and solar energetic particle (SEP) events. GCR particles propagation from local interstellar space to Earth is modeled using an extensionhe Badhwar and O’Neill model, where the solar modulation has been parameterized using high-latitude real-time neutron monitor measurements at Oulu, Tomnicky, and Moscow. During radiation storms, the SEP spectrum is derived using ion flux measurements taken from the NOAA/GOES and NASA/ACE satellites. Transport of the cosmic ray particles – GCR and SEP – through the magnetosphere is estimated using the CISM-Dartmouth particle trajectory geomagnetic cutoff rigidity code,driven by real-time solar wind parameters and interplanetary magnetic field data measured by the NASA/ACE satellite. Cosmic ray transport through the neutral atmosphere is based on analytical solutions of coupled Boltzmann transport equations obtained from NASA Langley Research Center’s HZETRN transport code. Global distributions of atmospheric density are derived from the NCEP Global Forecasting System (GFS) meteorological data.
http://sol.spacenvironment.net/raps_ops/current_files/globeView.html
http://sol.spacenvironment.net/nairas/index.html
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/goes-x-ray-flux
http://sol.spacenvironment.net/nairas/Dose_Rates.html
You can see that ionizing radiation very strongly operates in the zone the ozone, from a height of about 10 km.
Thanks, ten, for the information.
Where are you located? I would like to visit to get a better understanding of neutron monitoring measurements in the upper atmosphere.
Oliver K. Manuel
[email protected]
1-573-647-1377