Afternoon temperatures in Wisconsin have been declining since the 19th century. That didn’t suit NOAA’s agenda, so they cooled the past by 2.5 degrees.
Their hockey stick of fraud is quite spectacular.
I would love to see how Nick Stokes tries to justify this.
May AGW fraud continue and unity increase among bickering climate skeptics, so we may be able to move forward and repair damages after WWII to constitutional governments and to these fields of government-sponsored science by STALIN’S CONSENSUS SCIENCE:
1. Astronomy
2. Astrophysics
3. Climatology
4. Cosmology
5. Nuclear physics
6. Particle physics
7. Planetary physics
8. Solar physics and
9. Theoretical physics
https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/
Thanks to your patience, courage and talents as an investigative reporter, truth is breaking out:
https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/
Looks like they are using the same algorithm as was used adjusting the Reykjavik temperature record.
The meteorologists in Iceland were less than kind in describing their reaction to alteration of their own records!!
clivebest aug 16th at 4.18 am on wuwt has made what i consider the best comment in relation to how these manipulative techniques create the problems steve highlights.
Nick Stokes writes: “Anomalies are in fact local. It is the discrepancy relative to an observed average for that site – often confused. It is the statistical practice of subtracting the mean.”
That is correct but as a consequnce one should never then apply “Pairwise Homogenization Algorithm (PHA) Adjustments” which destroy that statistical spread. This automated algorithm which both NOAA and Berkeley use to “correct” the data has the effect of fixing a warming trend. It is the underlying reason why trends continue to rise. Yes their are some rational reasons why older data need adjusting due to station moves etc. but this homogenisation applied globally is simply wrong.
To give one example – Santiago, Chile
Red curves shows NOAA corrections for Santiago – resulting in 1.2C of apparent warming. Even CRU (green) did not meaure that. Blue are the raw measurements.
The Urban Heat Island(UHI) effect in reality mostly ‘cools’ the past in all land temperature series. This may seem counter-intuitive but the inclusion of stations in large cities has introduced a long term bias in normalised anomalies. The reason for this bias is that each station gets normalised to the same eg. 1961-1990 period independent of its relative temperature. Even though we know that a large city like Milan is on average 3C warmer than the surrounding area, it makes no difference to the apparent anomaly change. That is because all net warming due to city growth effectively gets normalised out when the seasonal average is subtracted. As a direct result such ‘warm’ cities appear to be far ‘cooler’ than the surrounding areas before 1950. This is just another artifact of using anomalies rather than absolute temperatures.
i would be interested to see nick stokes reply to the above.
Don’t hold your breath!
They successful inserted falsehoods into the very foundations of nuclear, solar and theoretical physics seventy years ago and now were exposed trying to change simple temperature measurements.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave
When first we practice to deceive!”
I am really surprised that the US doesn’t have the British common law offense of “Misconduct in public office”, otherwise how can you continue bringing up these clear cases of misconduct and nothing at all gets done?
This is a deep-seated problem that grew out-of-sight in our government research agencies worldwide after nations were united on 24 Oct 1945. All serious physicists worldwide are publicly invited to verify or dispute evidence of:
FALSE CHANGES IN
SOLAR PHYSICS &
NUCLEAR PHYSICS
AFTER 24 OCT 1945
https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/
The U.S. does have the misconduct in public office law. The Constitution even allows for judges up to the Supreme Court level to be fired. The idea that it is a life appointment setting them above the law is a progressive stunt that has become set in the minds of American politicians. The low-information voters (think stupid people) keep electing progressives because they want their goodies from the government. Democrat presidents like to appoint judges who have no regard for the Constitution. Supporting case law that does not have a basis in the Constitution has been all too common over the last 100 years.
George Washington himself fired a couple of justices for misconduct.
Make no mistake, these are prosecutable crimes, and we also have an impeachment process. What we lack these days is a politically independent criminal justice system, and a Congress that reflects the will of the people. Moreover, as indicated by many online comments these days (from all political sides), our younger generation is severely mentally disabled, such that they tend to just parrot and believe what the Left tells them. Rest assured that if opponents of the Left were to try this sort of thing, they’d be behind bars so fast they’d hardly know what hit them.
Sorry, I neglected to press Reply. The above comment was for Scottish Sceptic.
I agree with you.
Those extremely inconvenient and dirty 1930’s have to be adjusted into oblivion! I would be willing to bet there were more 100 degree days in Wisconsin during 1936 than all the years since 2000 Any takers? Probably more than since 1988.
He makes his adjustment code public, but does not explain it. And it does not change from your report. That is his explanation.