Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- Fact-Free Economist
- Academic Tipping Points
- Desperate Academics
- Climate Misinformation
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Unreliable And Toxic
Recent Comments
- Mango Thonotosassa on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- rah on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- Francis Barnett on Michael Mann Again
- Robertvd on “BE HONEST”
- Conrad Ziefle on Net Zero In The UK
- Conrad Ziefle on “BE HONEST”
- Francis Barnett on Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Conrad Ziefle on Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Terry Shipman on Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- James Snook on Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
Problematic Adjustments And Divergences (Now Includes June Data)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
That’s something I will never understand….it’s like to have to torture them to get them to give you any credit….maybe that’s changing a little…..I hope
Dr. Brown was quick to credit Tony. I have always found his comments to be easily understandable and heavily loaded. But he sticks to the facts, so I try to read all his comments.
Robert Brown is worse than any of the alarmists – he completely believes the nonsense promoted by Willis’s “Steel Greenhouse” proposal.
He even claims to have proven it mathematically.
The “steel Greenhouse” is the most absurd hypothesis ever proposed yet Brown defended it strenuously.
The entire structure of post-WWII consensus science is now in free fall collapse:
https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/
Wait a minute, I thought the debate was over 😉
Meanwhile back at the ranch, -107 means no mosquito repellant will be needed today.
http://www.wunderground.com/global/stations/89577.html
I wonder when the SyFy station is going to come up with the movie “Ice Skeeters!” 😉
Well there will be a balmy high of -91 there it says! Break out the flip flops and shorts and get the grill fired up! One needs to ask the alarmists when they will be moving there as climate refugees?
Think I’ll just stick around in my hell hole here in Central Indiana with a few showers this morning and a high of 69 deg. F (“real feel 82) and low of 66 forecast for tonight, and listen to the birds, tree frogs, and cicada sing their songs as I wait to see if my grass will dry enough to mow before it’s time to get to grilling. http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/anderson-in/46016/weather-forecast/328779
Excellent tomatoes and cucumbers coming out of my neighbors garden will be ready to go into the salad of hand torn spring mix and baby spinach with black olive slices and artichoke hearts we’ll be having with USDA Prime bone in Rib eyes off the grill and baked Golden Potatoes for dinner later with my daughter and her family.
How I dread the coming winter!
I am looking forward to a break from the heat, down here in Ft Myers.
Been a very hot summer.
Exactly like always.
Well you’ll be recompensed for the heat with nice weather this winter I’m sure. And I’ll be going where the snow flies. My parents had a nice place in Port Charlot when they were snow birds so I’m pretty familiar with your area since we ran down to Ft. Meyers at times. That ended a couple years ago when their health deteriorated to the point where they could no longer snow bird. Went over for a family gathering at my parents house to celebrate my Mom’s 80th birthday last night and my 60th and my daughters 40th were also part of the reason for the party. One of my greatest blessings is having a close family.
“Excellent tomatoes and cucumbers coming out of my neighbors garden …”
Does your neighbor know you’ve got his tomatoes and cucumbers? LOL
They are like Gail’s Zuchinni fairies. I open the back door to go out on the deck and there they were sitting on the wooden bench by the door. I help them a little to prepare the garden during the spring spreading and mixing in donkey dung and then have supplied them with grass cuttings during the summer that they lay down between the rows.
Regional Joke: Why do Ohioans lock their cars in the summer? So they do not find a back seat full of Zucchini when they get back to it!
I am grateful to Professor Robert Brown, Werner Brozek and Anthony Watts for confirming the “cutting edge” investigative reports by Steven.
Thanks to unity among climate skeptics, we may be able to move forward and repair damages to these related fields of study after WWII:
1. Astronomy
2. Astrophysics
3. Climatology
4. Cosmology
5. Nuclear physics
6. Particle physics
7. Planetary physics
8. Solar physics and
9. Theoretical physics
https://brittius.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/dr-o-manuel-ph-d-stalins-science/
Thanks omanuel. I a looking for data to support Stephan Goddards work. Friends of mine are referring to a wiki about Stephen that has the air or ire of saying, Only those who are ordained can be smart enough to do real science and Goddard isn’t an ordained priest.” My conundrum is how to refute the accusations. I’m not ordained either.
You do realise Robert Brown was the champion of the Steel Greenhouse effect ?
You know the one where introducing close fitting “shells” around a sphere with internal energy capable of maintaining it initially at minus 18 C will cause it to heat to 30 C with one “shell” added.
Each new “shell” causes further heating of the sphere. Add enough and you can melt the internal sphere.
He even claims to have proven this effect mathematically – I have the email.
Sorry, but I treat anything this guys says as questionable, at best !
I like to think wacky hypothesis and theory is way better than splicing tree ring samples to thermometer data when the two sets diverge. I like my science crazy, not fraudulent.
Stephen, I am getting some people who are questioning the value of your posts by linking to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Goddard Can you point me out something there or give something to add weight to the value of the data you are able to post and analyze. Help me please.