Arctic Has Gained Hundreds Of Miles Of Ice The Last Three Years

ScreenHunter_2977 Sep. 09 07.43

Red shows the September 2012 minimum extent. Green shows the current extent, which is likely the minimum for 2015. The Arctic has gained hundreds of miles of ice over the past three years, much of which is thick, multi-year ice.

Nobel Prize winning climate experts and journalists tell us that the Arctic is ice-free, because they are propagandists pushing an agenda, not actual scientists or journalists.

ScreenHunter_9954 Jul. 20 08.27

The End of the Arctic? Ocean Could be Ice Free by 2015 – The Daily Beast


Gore: Polar ice cap may disappear by summer 2014

ScreenHunter_4681 Nov. 16 22.25

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Arctic summers ice-free ‘by 2013′

screenhunter_69-jun-11-21-44 (2)

Why Arctic sea ice will vanish in 2013 | Sierra Club Canada

ScreenHunter_4675 Nov. 16 19.01ScreenHunter_4674 Nov. 16 18.59

Arctic Sea Ice Gone in Summer Within Five Years?

The Argus-Press – Jun 24, 2008

ScreenHunter_377 May. 12 13.16

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Arctic Has Gained Hundreds Of Miles Of Ice The Last Three Years

  1. Ron C. says:

    Arctic ice extent is now stabilizing at an average of 4.6M km2 for the first week of Sept. (MASIE). Wadhams predicted a minimum this year of 1M km2.

  2. Douglas Hoyt says:

    Dusting of snow at Barrow right now. Also it is 30F.

  3. stpaulchuck says:

    “The general public will be intelligence free by 2015.”

    AGW. QED.

  4. Robert Donaldson says:


    I have enjoyed your website for years. You are indeed the king of snark. I value your analysis, and can find no flaws in it. I would like to cite you in my discussions on CAGW however, your hostile style makes citing your information problematic. I have many leftist friends who are totally committed to the CAGW agenda. A few value my friendship enough to (grudgingly) engage in discussion on this subject although they make it clear that they consider me ignorant and a social troglodyte for even bringing it up. While your information is useful, your hostile, condescending style makes instant enemies and turns off any consideration of the content of your message. I am not suggesting you change your style (I like it) but it will never make a convert. If your goal is to insult and push people away from any discussion of a skeptical view of CAGW, you have that down pat. I am an engineer as well so I also have interpersonal problems, otherwise, I would never engage leftist friends on climate change.

    What I ask, is that you provide citations on all of your data and details on you personal analysis. I will use the source data, and your analysis method (with ascription) in my responses.

    Thank you for all of your hard work in sorting out the truth on CAGW. I have benefited immensely from your information.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *