Global warming causes permanent drought, floods, the demise of skiing, and harsh snowy winters.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
- “We Are From The Government And We Are Here To Help”
- Blinken Not Happy Yet
- Chief Executive Kamala
- “Investigated And Discredited”
- Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- No One Is Above The Law!
Recent Comments
- William on Woke Grok
- William on Woke Grok
- Greg in NZ on Woke Grok
- Gordon Vigurs on Woke Grok
- arn on Woke Grok
- Jack the Insider on Woke Grok
- arn on Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Disillusioned on Woke Grok
- Disillusioned on Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Disillusioned on Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
I think it could be more of a case of them thinking their readers are mesmerized drones and in many cases, they are probably correct. They just keep hitting the mantra of “global warming is happening, it is doing bad things, etc” and the trance continues.
Useful idiots being led like a hog with a ring in it’s nose.
Its. Apostrophe usage is a mystery to nearly everyone these days! No offense, I’m merely trying to educate.
That’s alright. I make mistakes all the time. My most frequent is using “their” when I should have used “they’re” I believe.
“Their” is possessive, such as in, “It was their mistake.” “They’re” is a contraction of “they are.” I also firmly believe that spell check and auto correct are generally incorrect, thus leading to the proliferation of such mistakes. One sees the same error repeated–another example might be AGW–frequently enough, and it’s accepted as truth.
I Know what to do, but typing at times I just don’t do it!
I used to try to play piano.. but nothing was recognisable 🙂
And the older I get the harder it gets to not make mistakes. Or perhaps there is a little bit of a subliminal attitude of I just don’t give a crap that is creeping into my psyche! I aced English Comp III and American LIt III a long time ago.
What? Somebody expects consistency out of people suffering from cognitive dissonance? Not to mention these reporters were probably dumbed down by attending socialist run schools. They probably start each day staring blankly at a propaganda sheet explaining today’s take on global warming, crank out their drivel, then wander off to the nearest pub to help them cope with having to sell their souls to the state every single day of their lives. Have some pity on them.
Do not lose sight of the fact that it was two of the Guardian Science writers Cook and the Dana Nut which orchestrated the 97% study..
Their memories are only skin deep!
Love the Banner from the 2006 story – “Comment is free” !
Now comment is highly scrutinized and censored – typical for alarmists when lots of people begin to question the “gospel” ! SkS is the ultimate example – they not only censor but re-write comments to say something completely different.
Liars the lot of them !
Should any here not know it, Cook and Dana N. whom I mentioned above are the very same two that have the SKS blog.
The Guardian, only plays “Chicken Little” with their own set of rules…
“Meltdown Proof Nuclear Reactors“:
http://junkscience.com/2015/09/05/meltdown-proof-nuke-reactors-i-vote-yes/