In 1974, the American Association For The Advancement Of Science had a global cooling consensus.
4 Mar 1974, Page 1 – at Newspapers.com
NASA has since erased this cooling, which scientists had agreed upon.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Francis Barnett on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- dm on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Tel on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Gamecock on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
It is comical to hear the alarmists deny there was a period of cooling between 1940 and 1980 when it is so well documented.
Yes the global cooling scare, where now the temperature in 1974 had never been lower than 1970. It used to be 1965.
AAAS, the same organization that is only 8% Republican, and now blames man for CACC.
Wow. And I’ll bet if you corrected ideology, there would no consensus at all on climate change. Liberal scientists believe or say they believe the bs, with conservative scientists not believing.
A couple of links:
Why Aren’t There Any Republican Scientists? The Answer May Not Be So Complicated
~
Only 10% of Republicans accept that climate change is human-caused
Now I actually think other polls show that that 10% figure to be more like 20 to 25%.
The first link I gave: “Why aren’t any Repubicans scientists” notes a poll that suggested only 6% of scientists are Republicans. But… it says that the survey sample was taken entirely from AAAS members. The problem is that AAAS is a political advocacy group, with the top issues it advocates for are climate change legislation, increased funding for the National Science Foundation, stem cell research, and green energy initiatives. So, they suggest that Republicans would NOT want to be part of such a group, and that explains the 6% numbers.
So, now that question remains: what percent of scientists are actually Republican?
I stand corrected. Yes, only six percent of AAAS members are Republican.
Leftists tend to be “joiners”, they like collectives and “socializing”. The rest of us tend to ,prefer to be on our own, and we don’t join clubs and organizations just to be “part of something”. This is why cities lean far left, the hive attracts leftists.
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.