Dixie Lee Ray was head of the Atomic Energy Commission and Governor of Washington, and she exposed the two leading scams of the climate criminals.
Margaret Thatcher on the other hand, didn’t do so well.
Dixie Lee Ray was head of the Atomic Energy Commission and Governor of Washington, and she exposed the two leading scams of the climate criminals.
Margaret Thatcher on the other hand, didn’t do so well.
Ozone depletion was not global but localized at the South Pole and it’s early recovery 20 years ahead of schedule, indicates that it is a natural cycle. It was neither depleted by humans not recovered by humans. And yet it was the Montreal Protocol that emboldened AGW activists to launch their war against carbon dioxide and fossil fuels.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2612810
Dixie was an eccentric Democrat, the last of the sane ones vis-à-vis science. She was good at the Mount Saint Helen’s aftermath, promoted atomic energy and had her hear squared away wrt climate matters. Considering the chair-warmers since her and especially noting the enviro-wacko doofus now in the governor’s chair, she is missed.
Dixie was an eccentric Democrat, the last of the sane ones vis-à-vis science. She was good at the Mount Saint Helen’s aftermath, promoted atomic energy and had her head squared away wrt climate matters. Considering the chair-warmers since her and especially noting the enviro-wacko doofus now in the governor’s chair, she is missed.
The ozone ‘hole’ this year was the 4th biggest on record (since 1979) and the minimum ozone level remains stubbornly at around the same level it was when the protocol was signed in 1989.
Contrary to Wikipedia’s unsupported assertion:
As a result of the international agreement, the ozone hole in Antarctica is slowly recovering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol
nothing has ‘recovered’ in the slightest.
Which is just ONE of many such examples I NEVER USE “WikiPedia” as a primary source for anything!
What’s more,
Most college professors, as I was told, will flunk every paper written based on data from WikiPedia. Gee! If they know about the severe crdeibility problems of WikiPedia in academic studies, WHY does this not also seem true to the folks at Politifact, Snopes, Salon, etc. ? ? ? – Gee! I wonder WHY the lies get more ridiculous as time goes by.
The elimination of freons with the C-CL and C-F bonds may be a factor in the change in ozone concentration. The process by which freons reduced the amount of ozone is slow and complicated, and as always when there is stressor, nature often finds a way to counter act it.
I think a fair statement is to say, there is a large amount of uncertainty. That being so because that type of freon is no longer used.
Incidentally, oxygen gas O2 changes to ozone O3 in small amounts when lightening strikes.
Ozone has a slightly pleasant smell, Sometimes the faint amount after a storm can be detected, However, it is poisonous.
Ozone has a rather sweet type of bleach like smell. In my experience, it was very noticeable during T-storms.
No one ever explained HOW Freons (which are more than 2.7 times as dense as our atmospheric gases) ever made up to the high altitudes of the Ionosphere! Gee! Can the lies about Freons being the all-evil-devil get any weirder? ? ?
No one ever mentions the side effects of the Montreal Protocol.
CFC (Nonflamible) were replaced by flammable propellants in areosol cans (propane, butane and iso-butane) In at least one case I know the filling line blew-up and a friend was horribly burned over most of his body. I also got a lot of customer complaints about fire/areosol cans/ and cigarettes.
In one letter the lady said she disposed of the contents of the areosol can in the toilet. Soon after hubby sat down for his daily contribution to the septic system smoked his morning cigarette and tossed it still lit into the toilet. The toilet blew up, injuring him and causing a mess so they were planning to sue my company.
There’s also the horrible effect of formerly cheap generic asthma inhalers becoming expensive because reformulating the propellant provides as excuse to jack up the price.
Hi there
I’m here to ask about the HVV that was announce in 1665.. I want to know why the tests were stopped due to a glitch.. why can’t you start experimentin again on humans.. why stop such a dramatic virus… Please I need to speak to a scientist who knows what I am talking about its important that it comes back :'(