I don’t have any idea what this means, but Carbon Brief rates me the most influential climate denier on Twitter.
Mapped: The climate change conversation on Twitter – Carbon Brief
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Because you seem to dig up the most stuff.
I’ve plunked down my $15 for the 7:00 P.M. showing of “Climate Hustle” this coming Monday. I hope to meet a few new friends before & after the show.
From the article: “Measuring influence is not like measuring rising sea levels or air pollution. It is inherently ephemeral and subject to human cognitive bias.”
Kind of like climate models.
Hmm… Sounds like “measuring influence” could be a wholly owned subsidiary of Climate Inc.
It is.
If you want to prosecute dissent you must identify it, locate it and measure it.
The prominence of the U.S. Attorney General among the promoters of the AGW hypothesis is not an accident.
Loretta is leading her own Lynch mob.
Like true love, nominative determinism will always find a way.
Kinda like Anthony Weiner? Seriously, you can’t make this stuff up… :P
Blood & Gore? :)
Blood and Gore: Making a Killing
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/11/03/blood-and-gore-making-a-killing-on-anti-carbon-investment-hype
——————–
(mobile screens were not designed for this old peasant’s thumbs, especially not for HTML coding)
Ooh! Another one: Bernie Madoff – as in he made-off with other people’s money…
I think the common sense gene would have kicked in (at least I hope it would) if someone approached me with the name “Madoff” with a scheme for investing my life savings, and I would run the other way… I could be wrong, though…
Doug,
I reckon people got greedy about returns and ignored the hint with Madoff but would you have work done by this prominent urologist and surgeon?
Dr. Richard “Dick” Chopp
I gather he’s good at what he does.
<blockquote It is inherently ephemeral and subject to human cognitive bias.
What’s the big difference? They apply the same methodology.
If you start by measuring the influence on people “denying climate”, you will find influence on those “denying climate”.
If you define CO2 as a pollutant and go out to measure air pollution, you will find air polluted by CO2.
If you set out to measure how much CO2 levels influence air temperature and sea levels rather than if they meaningfully do, you will find they do.
You are the man!! We should all aspire to such honor. (no sarc intended)
Yep! It means you’re the Shiznit of telling the truth about climate science.
We’re unbelievably proud of you, (yet slightly jealous at the same time).
Keep up the great work!
It’s kinda like winning a Nobel Prize for truth… but without the fame & fortune.
Sorry.
But we’re still proud of you.
What is striking about this particular group is their comparative isolation from the rest of the map. This means that they converse a lot about climate change, but almost exclusively among themselves. They rarely retweet or converse with people outside of their tribe. Equally, they are rarely ever retweeted or mentioned by people outside of their tribe. This would more conventionally be called an “echo chamber”.
Not really sure this is as flattering as you seem to think.
Isn’t exactly the same true of warmist twitterers?
Tony Heller: “I don’t have any idea what this means …”
Peter Ellis : “Not really sure this is as flattering as you seem to think.”
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Inconceivable!!
Seething with jealousy…
Since all the alarmists have me blocked, it makes it a little hard to converse with them.
They are certainly VERY scared of the truth, aren’t they :-)
The LAST thing the alarmists want is to get into a climate science debate with you.
Trouble for me is Tony you raise so much data evidence but I’m not that savvy enough to go through the data myself do the math and say its bang on correct. I have no reason to disbelieve you but I really wish I could go through it all and know its right . This is the problem . You, Jennifer Marohasy, Paul Homeward seem to take a stand on the temperature data tampering, but where is Watts , Essenbach. and say McKintyre. How about Roy Spencer has he communicated to you any opinions
Don’t forget Pierre at NoTricksZone.
That’s a shame. The carbonists want to hear from these deniers so bad …
Twitter account of ‘prominent AGW skeptic’ Steven Goddard suspended
Another Global Warming Skeptic Gets Suspended From Twitter
Reddit bans comments from global warming skeptics
LA Times: On letters from climate-change deniers
http://ecowatch.com/2013/12/20/news-outlets-ban-climate-change-deniers
EcoWatch: 4 News Outlets Ban Climate Change Deniers
That’s a shame. The carbonists want to hear from these deniers so bad …
Twitter account of ‘prominent AGW skeptic’ Steven Goddard suspended
Another Global Warming Skeptic Gets Suspended From Twitter
[let’s try to reduce the number of references to get past the spam filter]
And here are more eager carbon debaters:
Reddit bans comments from global warming skeptics
LA Times: On letters from climate-change deniers
http://ecowatch.com/2013/12/20/news-outlets-ban-climate-change-deniers
EcoWatch: 4 News Outlets Ban Climate Change Deniers
I didn’t mean to post the image. It is my first post here and it provides a link to use an image. I thought it was for my username. Sorry. Feel free to delete the image.
Congratulations on the honor given to you. Keep up the excellent work
Well done!
With your prominent status, may I offer a word of advice?
Do NOT accept an invitation for a late night meeting with Shrillary Clinton at Ft Marcy Park…
I don’t tweet, so do not “follow”Steve’s tweets that way, but bookmarked his Twitter handle and check it out regularly. Anybody else do that? And, can I claim to be a member (lurker status only, of course) of the tribe?
Lurker? Brother, you are the strong silent type. Remember, Calvin Coolidge never tweeted once.
You are a full member of the tribe. Your tribal name is No Chinwag Windsong.
not a tweet
Congratulations Steve, your relentless presentation of the truth and the history is getting through to people and the Warmistas are worried.
Well good work on your part. but I cant believe that an organization wasted a small fortune of money on this let alone time.
I was commenting on a news article last weekend. There was a pretty lively dialog going on. I logged into my account a few days later and noticed that fully half of my posts were removed.
You don’t see this behavior in science, however you do see it with religion where heretics must be silenced to protect the flock.
So a non twit, is king of the twits… uhh… congat’s?
It looks to me like a roadmap for making ad hominem attacks. Don’t like Steve S. Goddard? Make an unsubstantiated attack on someone you don’t like and then point to this graphic as evidence that your target is guilty. Heck, it worked for Peter Ellis, didn’t it?
For some inane reason, Carbon Brief had me there as well, along with ryan and a few others. (very small font) Maybe they want to make a list like the Nazi’s used to do.
I’m proud to be on the same list with Tony Heller.
Integrity is a much underused word in science these days.
You have heaps Tony.
And Climate Alarmists have very little.
They are truly in this great big scam just for the Trillions.