Democrats Nominated A Psychopath

Hillary Clinton is a career criminal and congenital liar. But she owns the press corps, who are going to incredible lengths to cover up for her.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

53 Responses to Democrats Nominated A Psychopath

  1. Latitude says:

    Just this past week the news reported…
    1. She had some kind of seizure
    2. She called Trump her husband
    3. She said she short circuited

    …problem with lying is you have to remember what you lied about
    and that gets harder with old age

  2. gator69 says:

    Democrats Nominated A Psychopath, Again

    • Andy says:

      And the GOP didn’t want to nominate their psychopath but did.

      I’m just grabbing my popcorn here in the UK, it’s going to be fun over the next 3 months. You ain’t seen nothin’ yet ….

      Andy

      • Latitude says:

        Andy, the democrat “establishment”, RINOS
        …and he was nominated by popular vote in spite of them trying to rig it

      • gator69 says:

        This is why am not a democrat and why I am not a republican, both parties have been taken over by Progressives. It really is a two party system here, Libertarians, and then everyone else.

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          Like me, the conservative libertarians I know typically vote Republican out of practical necessity but I always remind myself that Progressivism originally started in the Republican Party.

          • T M says:

            True, and the KKK, Jim Crow, and forced segregation were all Democratic inventions.

          • Andy DC says:

            I am no fan of Hillary or the Democrat Party, and I plan to vote for Trump. But I strongly disagree with the ridiculous notion that today’s Democrats are somehow connected to racist party members from 50-100 years ago.

            Everyone knows that in the 1960’s and 1970’s the Southern white segregationists in the Democrat party switched to the Republican Party. That is now ancient history.

            To say that anyone in today’s Democratic Party has any resemblance to Strom Thurmond is absurd.

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            Just to avoid any possible misunderstanding, I didn’t point out the Republican Party’s “progressivism” as a compliment. it’s just a fact of history, and the belief in government action was very universal in the Progressive Era. Woodrow Wilson was a Progressive Democrat and a proud racist. Progressivism itself has deep racist roots as anyone familiar with Planned Parenthood, the eugenics movement, The Fabians or Karl Marx’s writings knows, and its racism is not limited to people of African ancestry.

            Second, while I like to rub it in myself at times and point out the racist history of the Democratic Party to some of my more gullible “progressive” neighbors, it is true that racism was just as prevalent in the Republican North during the Civil War and Reconstruction.

            The Democratic Party has certainly changed from 50-100 years ago. Living in lily-white, “progressive” and strongly Democratic Boulder gives a good vantage point to observe the “white liberal” attitudes of today. The condescending bigotry of low expectations towards blacks is widespread even though these “liberals” protest furiously if their well-meaning attitudes are equated to racism. The big difference is that many of the original Southern racists actually lived among blacks and knew them well. That is not true in Boulder and other segregated white “liberal” enclaves.

          • PhilJourdan says:

            So did the revocation of Habeas Corpus.

          • cdquarles says:

            What ‘everyone’ knows isn’t necessarily so, AndyDC. The really racist Ds died rather than switch. Not every Southern D that played a segregationist on TV actually was such, too.

        • kuhnkat says:

          Except if you look at your candidate Johnson you see the creeping Progressivism there also. When a Libertarian thinks Big Gubmint should ram social change down our throats…

          • gator69 says:

            One candidate does not a party make.

            I would still take Johnson over the other two, as I value personal liberty over all else. But you are welcome to continue to support the most progressive party, if you wish.

            A quote regarding beams and eyes comes to mind.

      • tonyheller says:

        Andy still licking his wounds from Brexit. Trump next.

        • RAH says:

          Well Jo Nova and others are blogging about Cliexit. I would love to see that and I think it will happen to a large extent though people like you will have to tell us about it since the MSM sure won’t.

  3. Andy says:

    Normally you have two candidates who you have to decide who is the best of the two.

    The US seems to have picked a couple who you need to pick from who you dislike least. Is that how it should be? No, you have got into a right muddle this time around it seems.

    Good luck!

    :)

    Andy

    • Latitude says:

      One candidate won the nomination by their political party rigging it….
      …the other candidate won by popular vote, in spite of the political party trying to rig it

      Who would you choose?

    • gator69 says:

      It has nothing to do with “liking” a candidate, unless you are a school girl. What we are deciding here in America, is how much more freedom are we willing to sacrifice.

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        True, although I know a few school girls that know better, or at least know they should know better. There is hope, maybe not for Andy, but there is hope.

      • Beale says:

        Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both.

        Frederick Douglass

    • kuhnkat says:

      That is how it has been for decades if not a century. The fact people thought there were acceptable candidates only shows how well the propaganda was working and how misinformed the media kept them.

    • PhilJourdan says:

      Actually, that is “normal” if you listen to the MSM. Why? because the democrats always nominate sleeze, and the excuse from the MSM is that “they are all the same”, so most look at it that way.

  4. garyh845 says:

    Hillary’s other lie during the interview with Chris Wallace:

    WALLACE: One reason that people question your account, and this gets to the important question of trust, is because that day at Andrews [when the remains of the 4 Americans came home], you never talked about terrorism. You talked about the video.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    CLINTON: We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    CLINTON: No, that’s not — that’s not fair. If you go back and read everything that I said that day, I quoted people who talked about it being terrorism. I had already said it was terrorism. There was no doubt it was terrorism.

    That’s a lie. Hillary Clinton had not already said publicly – in any public statement – in any interview – that the attack was terrorism, an act of terror, nor that it was carried out by terrorists. Then, it was another 7 days after her comments at Andrews before Hillary said that it was terrorism. Ref: http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/the-benghazi-timeline-clinton-edition/

    Now – there is a spin here that perhaps she is playing with. On the night of, and the morning after the attack in Benghazi, she had already emailed Chelsea and in that email she stated that it was a terrorist attack, and she had called the President of Egypt and expressed to him that we knew that it was a terrorist attack. Still the next day, and at Andrews, and reportedly directly to several of the family members of the fallen, she refused to call it an act of terrorism and continued to blame it on the video. That had to be orders from the Obama administration.

    For a bit of fun, even Jon Stewart of the Daily Show understood clearly what was going on from day one:

    http://www.cc.com/video-clips/3gy5pa/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-american-terror-story

    • garyh845 says:

      The media coverage of this. Well, I don’t imagine any national media outlet has mentioned this lie during the past week — few have even come straight out and reported that she lied on her email issues last Sunday.

      For a point of reference of how outrageously biased [not even the correct term here] For example, in the feature article covering Comey’s appearance in front of the Congressional Committee, the day before, this is how the Los Angeles Time’s presented his view of her repeated lying:

      “Despite being pressed repeatedly by Republicans, Comey declined to say whether he believed Clinton lied in her public statements about the email server.”

      That’s it – that’s as much as they are going to allow.

      The first two minutes of this video – puts that to shame. The LAT’s just out and out lied to their readers, and continue to:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV6q9LOubfc

      That is a straight out lie – from the LAT’s. That is not what transpired in the hearing

  5. Martin Hertzberg says:

    Only one psychopathic, pathological lying narcissist, draft-dodging con-man, Putin brown noser, is running. Guess who?

  6. Fred says:

    Umm, most politicians are psychopaths or at the very least, suffer from narcissistic personality disorder. They do not care about the sheeple and I have no idea why some get shocked at that fact or think multi millionaires in positions of power actually would care about them.

    Hitlery is a special kind of evil though and is probably worse than Trump who is himself, a psychopathic piece of garbage.

    I hope this website will focus less on politics and lame false flag terrorism posts and just stick to the global warming fraud. And yes, I said false flag. If one believes global warming is a fraud created by the elites/politicians to fill their agenda and control the sheeple then why is it so hard for those same people to believe most of the terrorism that goes on is also created by them and also created for the same reasons of money and control? You’re talking about the same people so why can they BS in one area but not the other? Especially when many of them are clinical psychopaths so a few sheeple here and there dying is not a big deal to them.

    Here’s the thing about the whole “Muslim terrorism” fairytale…if the 9/11 narrative was legit (in all its physics and logic defying ways), then you’d be seeing attacks happen continually in the U.S yet that isn’t happening and in 15 years, nothing of significance has happened. To think those evil boogeymen were able to pull off this big attack, the largest in known history, and NOT follow it up is pretty naive.

    • RAH says:

      For me it’s easy. In Clinton we KNOW we will get a very corrupt politician. In Trump the question is really unanswered. Clinton has been so bad and dishonest and represents the established parties so much, that I’ll take my chances on Trump. And as far as the AGW/”Climate Change” scam goes it is pretty apparent who is most likely to support the scam and who isn’t. Besides if the MSM is for it then 99% of the time I’ll be against it.

    • kuhnkat says:

      Except there are just so damn many times that Trump has PERSONALLY helped people…

    • Gail Combs says:

      “…They do not care about the sheeple and I have no idea why some get shocked at that fact or think multi millionaires in positions of power actually would care about them….”

      Actually since Trump was not a politician we have a pretty good idea of whether or not he cares about others. The MSM never bothered to hide his good deeds before this last year. Just remember that the MSM is 100% behind Hillary Clinton and will lie and cheat to see she gets in office.

      A Man Was Being Beaten to Death with a Bat…

      …Donald Trump never sought attention for this story, but during his trip he noticed a man on the sidewalk being brutally assaulted by a “big guy” with a baseball bat. Trump noticed the victim taking “5 or 6 whacks” and knew he was about to be killed.

      Without hesitation, Trump told the driver to pull the car over and he leaped out of the car. His ex-wife Marla Maples was tugging at his arm trying to stop him….

      Trump Saved NY Veterans Day Parade Marking 50th Anniversary of End of WWII

      …Trump holds the Phelps Award as 2008 Honoree of the Year by the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Plaza.

      UPI reported in 1995 how Trump was credited with ‘saving’ the New York Veterans Day Parade. The parade that year was marking the fiftieth anniversary of the end of World War II….

      Police estimated 500,000 people attended the largest military parade ever held in New York. Organizers, who placed the turnout at closer to a million, said the parade would not have been a success if it hadn’t been for real estate developer Donald Trump, who contributed $200,000 and raised another $300,000.

      “Donald Trump saved the parade,” said parade director Tom Fox, himself a Vietnam veteran. “We had asked for donations from 200 corporations, and none of them came through,” he said.

      “This donation is the single most important thing I’ve ever done,” said a beaming Trump. “This is more important than all of my buildings and my casinos. This is my way of saying thank you to all the men an women in the armed services who have made it possible for me to become a success. Without them freedom and liberty would be gone.”

      …Organizers received no contributions from the 200 corporations they asked, among them military contractors to whom they presented documentation of profits made on weapons used in World War II.

      “Zippo, dada, zilch,” Mr. Fox said. “Nothing from Northrup, United Technologies, none of them. To me, it’s a sin.”

      By mid-August, organizers had a bank account of exactly $1.21….

      This was not Trump’s first time supporting the New York Veterans Day Parade. In 1987 Trump gave $1 million to help the parade when it was in transition, according to a history of the parade reported by Business Insider in 2013.

      And this is not the first time Trump helped the people of NYC. At the Republican National Convention, Rudy Giuliani breaks a promise to Donald Trump during RNC Speech

      …” Giuliani admitted he was letting out a secret about Trump at the Republican National Convention on Monday.

      “Every time New York City suffered a tragedy, Donald Trump was there to help. He’s not going to like my telling you this, but he did it anonymously,” Giuliani said, calling Trump a “man with a big heart.”

      “When police officers were shot, when firefighters were hurt, when people were in trouble, he came forward and he helped, and he asked not to be mentioned. Well, I am going to break my promise to him. I am going to mention it,” he added. as the crowd cheered.

      “I am telling you this because I am sick and tired of the defamation of Donald Trump by the media and by the Clinton campaign,” Giuliani said in a rebuff to accusations about Trump’s charitable giving.

      “This is a good man and America should be sick and tired of their vicious nasty campaign,” he said. “You deserve to know this about your next president.”

    • Gail Combs says:

      What about Trump the ‘Racist’ meme?
      Trump INSISTED on including Jews and blacks at Palm Beach golf course in 1990s

      “When Donald opened his club in Palm Beach called Mar-a-Lago, he insisted on accepting Jews and blacks even though other clubs in Palm Beach to this day discriminate against blacks and Jews. The old guard in Palm Beach was outraged that Donald would accept blacks and Jews so that’s the real Donald Trump that I know.”…
      In the 1990s, Trump was running into a problem getting his golf course approved by the local town council in Palm Beach, which was imposing restrictions on his bid.
      So Trump shot back with maximum effect. As reported by the Washington Post’s Mary Jordan and Rosalind Helderman on Nov. 14, 2015: “Trump undercut his adversaries with a searing attack, claiming that local officials seemed to accept the established private clubs in town that had excluded Jews and blacks while imposing tough rules on his inclusive one.”
      The Washington Post report continues, “Trump’s lawyer sent every member of the town council copies of two classic movies about discrimination: ‘A Gentleman’s Agreement,’ about a journalist who pretends to be Jewish to expose anti-Semitism, and ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner’ about a white couple’s reaction to their daughter bringing home a black fiancé.”
      Sometimes, in judging the character of an individual, it pays to see what people actually do when nobody’s really paying attention. When it came to segregation in the South at private, all-white country clubs, it might have been in Trump’s business interests to simply look the other way. Instead, Trump did the right thing and insisted on desegregation at his golf resort.
      And he won. http://truthfeed.com/trump-insisted-on-including-jews-and-blacks-at-palm-beach-golf-course-in-1990s-when-others-didnt/10528/

      (Members at Mar a Lago get privileges at a large handful of Trump golf courses. Mar a Lago is only 20ac and is a club not a course. Seems fact escape journalist all the time.)

    • Gail Combs says:

      And while we are setting the record straight
      Trump the Widow and Eminent Domain

      “The history of the Coking widow.
      In the late 1970s, Penthouse tycoon Bob Guccione, eager to get in on the Atlantic City casino action, offering Coking $1 million for her lot. She refused. Exasperated, Guccione tried to build his facility around the house, but his project went broke before he could finish, leaving a steel frame looming over Coking’s place for more than a decade. There was a massive steel framework virtually encasing the house.
      She had run the house as a low income “boarding” home, but did not take any borders from the time the first casino was built in 1978.
      Trump comes along in the early 90’s and acquires the unfinished Guccione project, and the CRDA (the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority) offered her low market value – condition considered, and she refused. She wanted one million (even though she had refused that same amount when offered to her in 1980), (then later on down the road when Trump came up to her asking she refused her own asking price).
      She blamed Trump personally for some damage done to her roof by the construction company that had the job of disassembling that steel structure that Guccione had built OVER her house.
      The construction company took full ownership of the damage, and offered to pay her $90,000 to have repairs. She refused. She wanted more and she wanted to sue Trump in the bargain. The judge wouldn’t go for that. Eventually she took the $90,000 because she was so far in arrears on her property taxes that she was in immediate danger of having the house foreclosed for unpaid taxes.
      Superior Court Judge Richard Williams said the attempt by the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority to take the property for a new parking lot and a public park at Trump Plaza Hotel & Casino was flawed because it did not guarantee that the company would not later use the land simply to expand the business. Yet, Trump never did do anything with that land he had the massive structure removed from except build a parking lot AND a landscaped public green-space.
      Trump did her a huge favor in the end by removing that massive steel structure that the first developer had built OVER and surrounding her house. Trump did remove that. And he had a parking lot and green space landscaped where the massive structure had been. She was hunkered down under that thing for a dozen years because she was holding out for more money. Without the casino’s that were going in her property wasn’t worth half of what she had been offered in 1979, but she figured she’d get rich off of it. Fine, but it didn’t work out that way for her and she eventually lost the place because of unpaid taxes.

      BY THE NUMBERS
      $20,000~
      Is what Vera Coking and her husband paid for the 29-room boardinghouse/low income rooming house. In 1961.
      $1 million offered by Bob Guccione in 1979/1980.
      $1 million offered by Trump after Superior court denied ED.
      $530,000~Price fetched at auction.
      $995,000~ Reduced asking price prior to forced auction.
      $2M~Amount Donald Trump offered as recently as several years ago prior to the auction.
      AND – it was reported in the newspapers that Trump not only eventually offered her 2+ million, but in addition to also provide her a free place to live in Palm Beach FL for the remainder of her life. “
      Ladysforest

  7. Give Hillary Clinton credit for “skilled” lying — good enough to keep her out of jail since the 1970’s, while building up a “family” net worth of over $100,000,000 !

    Hillary said she did not lie to the FBI.

    That may be true.

    The FBI questions and her answers remain secret.

    There was no audio or video recording.

    There are no transcripts

    The FBI Director was not even there.

    The FBI agents involved signed a non-disclosure agreement making them subject to random lie detector testing.

    All of this means it is possible Hillary took the 5th amendment and refused to answer all questions … or she could have said “I don’t recall” in response to most questions … or she may have told the truth knowing Big Bill, her open marriage “husband”, had already set up a deal with Loretta Lynch where Hillary knew in advance there would be no prosecution no matter what she said.

    We will never know the questions and Hillary’s answers in the unusual Saturday interview in Hillary’s home.

    My wife says Hillary must “have the goods” on Comey to be treated so well after he clearly stated she broke every law the Republicans claimed she did, and she repeatedly lied to Congress too.

    Hillary says she disposed of 33,000 eMails.
    Maybe she disposed of 66,000, or over 100,000?
    Can one ever trust a number from a Clinton?

    She disposed of ALL OF HER STATE DEPARTMENT eMails (as digital files)
    She only gave hard copies of about 30,000 to the State Department.

    James Comey and Loretta Lynch had good records until they met up with Hillary and Bill — now they have been pulled into the Arkansas Gutter with the Clintons.

    In my opinion, our Ambassador was in Benghazi to manage shipping of weapons from Libya to “rebels” in Syria … who later turned out to be ISIS … or at lest ISIS ended up with the weapons.

    That’s what got the eMail scandal started.

    More important, in my opinion — Clinton Foundation is a slush fund.

    My 2016 politics blog:
    http://www.ElectionCircus.Blogspot.com

    • kuhnkat says:

      The issue is not whether she lied to the FBI, but whether she has lied to We the People. The FACTS that Comey told us conflict with Hitlery’s PUBLIC statements. She lied continuously and Comey refused to say whether she did or not. If he admitted she lied he would have had to refer her to the DOJ for charges. He had to refrain. Of course. the FACTS shows she lied so he also could not claim she had not lied without putting himself into jeopardy.

      Hitlery has been caught based on other sources of her email such as recipients and hackers. WikiLeaks is hammering in the nails showing her lies on a number of fronts.

      • Hillary lies so often that it’s only “news” when she tells the truth!

        The Clintons are the most corrupt politicians at the Presidential level in a century – from “broke” to $100,000,000+ net worth in 15 years selling influence and access.

  8. jochlarson says:

    A cabinet level employee in the Federal Government has to have very high security clearances to be able to access the highest classified information. They also should have been required to go through classified material handling training. This training should include the recognition of classified information, even if it wasn’t marked, and the requirement that they take action to get it marked before continuing to communicate the information. Why isn’t this even mentioned in all the discussions about this issue??

    • tonyheller says:

      Hillary signed an NDA saying she understood classified is “marked or unmarked”

      • DrSandman says:

        I’ve been through her training, because my shop supplies her with Intel. She knew better. She is a crook who should be in jail.

    • Latitude says:

      They were required…it was mandatory

      Clinton never did it

    • gator69 says:

      I work for a bank, and I am required to be able to recognize the difference between confidential and public information wether it is marked or not. If I fail to properly handle confidential material, I lose my job and I colud likely face prosecution. And yet if I fail to properly handle “classified” information, nobody dies.

      Hillary has no legitimate excuse here.

      • RAH says:

        I an enlisted soldier in the Army did even 1/8th of what Clinton did they would be in Leavenworth.

        • cdquarles says:

          My son that is in the Navy has also had that training (part of the OCS). If he mishandles it once and the breach gets investigated, he’d be court-martialed and imprisoned.

  9. Gail Combs says:

    Instead of believing what the Lying Media tells you to believe, READ what Trump has said.

    Full text: Donald Trump 2016 RNC draft speech transcript

    Most of it is also found in his two books from years ago that I read.

    Note on Abortion he says that is a STATES ISSUE not federal.

    Notice on COMMON CORE he says that is a STATES ISSUE and not federal.

    Notice he wants to massively CUT REGULATIONS to help business grow.

    He wants to CUT TAXES to help the economy grow.

    He supports oil and gas and Keystone and wants energy independence.

    He was against the various invasions in the middle east and says that is what caused the current mess. He wants to build up the military because he realizes a strong military, like a gun is a peacemaker. He wants good relations with Russia while Hillary wants war.

    He also says on FAIR TRADE he wants bilateral agreements and not multilateral. He wants decent deals that are a win-win for all parties AND he wants to keep other countries from screwing the USA. Why should China be allowed currency manipulation, DEMAND patents AND TAX USA IMPORTS while we do not? Why should China be allowed to DEMAND Boeing open a plant in China and give them their patents or they will not buy Boeing planes?

    Remember the USA has major costs of regulation and thanks to Obummer high energy costs. (US tax payers have via the World Bank paid for China’s coal plants) Why should a company be allowed to move to a country where they hire slave labour with poor working conditions and trash the environment and then expect to sell their inferior product to the USA at a much lower price putting our factories out of business. Right now we are losing 14 factories A DAY!

    Are you, who dislike Trump, all in favour of the USA joining the rest of the world with a two class system of the elite and the peasants? Because that is the other choice.

    BTW. Trump met in a close door meeting with 40 Church leaders and a couple of Rabiis. Out of that meeting he found out about LBJs change to the Tax code that muzzled the churches. As a result he put repealing 501c3 from the Tax code as a plank. He addresses it in his speech. So he is certainly willing to listen and learn.

    He built his very successful business on self-confidence**, smarts, an ability to spot raw talent and train it PLUS a willingness to LISTEN and he will listen to anyone from janitors to generals with no built in prejudice.

    I do not think we will get much better.

    The other choice is the complete destruction of the USA from which we can not recover.
    With Hitlery getting to put in 3 to 5 Supreme Court Justices you can kiss the 1st and 2nd Amendments good bye. She has point blank said she will get rid of the 2nd.

    With Hiltlery you get the destruction of US sovereignty. (Pleas see BREXIT the Movie)

    Trans-Pacific Partnership Synopsis FROM THE US GOVERNMENT

    This treaty literally strips the USA of sovereignty and allows totalitarian rule by Corporations and bureaucrats with a bit of help from NGOs to add a veneer of ‘democracy.’

    DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
    ” ….TPP Parties aim to have these disputes resolved through impartial, unbiased panels. … Panels will consider requests from non-governmental entities located in the territory of any disputing Party to provide written views regarding the dispute to panels during dispute settlement proceedings.

    Panels will be composed of three international trade and subject matter experts independent of the disputing Parties, with procedures available to ensure that a panel can be composed even if a Party fails to appoint a panelist within a set period of time. These panelists will be subject to a code of conduct to ensure the integrity of the dispute settlement mechanism.

    To maximize compliance, the Dispute Settlement chapter allows for the use of trade retaliation (e.g., suspension of benefits), if a Party found not to have complied with its obligations fails to bring itself into compliance with its obligations. Before use of trade retaliation, a Party found in violation can negotiate or arbitrate a reasonable period of time in which to remedy the breach….”

    Do not forget that trade sanctions crippled Iraq.

    Trump, in exchange for his endorsement to Paul Ryan extracted the promise that TPP would NOT come to the floor to be voted on during the lame duck session.

    Trump is really making the elite bat-shit crazy. (A real plus) This is from the magazine of the Council on Foreign Relations! It’s Time for the Elite to Rise up Against the Ignorant Masses — Trump 2016 and Brexit “The Brexit has laid bare the political schism of our time. It’s not about the left vs. the right; it’s about the sane vs. the mindlessly angry.” and then goes on to call republicans science deniers….

    **Self-confidence is something Trump stresses to others. If you do not reach for the stars you will be stuck in the mud. He is correct. Thomas Edison said ” Genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration.” Trump added the very necessary ingredient of self-confidence that allows you to try and try and try despite repeated failure. As a battered child I can tell you lack of self-confidence severely hampered me through out my life.

    • Andy DC says:

      Thanks, Gail. Excellent and interesting analysis.

      • Gail Combs says:

        Thanks guys,

        I can not do what Tony does but I can do research so that is what I have been concentrating on. Trump was not my original pick. I liked Scott Walker, Dr Ben Carson and Rand Paul.

        However this time we need a lion not a pastor. A General Patton with all his character flaws.

        Speaking of military, Trump was 4-F because of heel spurs according to one of his books I read. I have them too and believe me trying to walk in Vietnam combat boots** with heel spurs is extremely painful. A couple of my friends also got 4-F because of bad foot conformation at the time so this was not surprising or special.

        ** I have a case of ‘Nam boots bought in 1972 for caving. Both my ex-husband and I had similar foot sizes. My feet are smaller but after adding thick moleskin to pad the *&@% heel spurs they were about the same size.

  10. TA says:

    Great post, Gail. You hit all the important points.

    It’s hard to find the real Donald Trump through the storm of Leftwing Media smears. Posts like yours sort it all out for us, and get us back on track.

    If people value their personal freedoms, they should vote for Trump in November. As one poster mentioned above, Trump is a little bit of an unknown, but Hillary is definitely a know quantity: a serial liar whose self-interests supercede the interests of the United States. Not to mention that Hillary’s email server has probably been copied by every enemy the U.S. has in the world, which subjects Hillary to blackmail.

    There is only one good choice in this race: Trump.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.