CNN Is No Longer Fake News

The left is fully occupied by morons.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to CNN Is No Longer Fake News

  1. Latitude says:

    total disconnect….

    Lost the election….lost over 1000 seats

    ….double down on what did it

  2. RAH says:

    Lets keep the left moronic because they are destroying their potential for regaining power every day by their actions.

    In reality what has happened is as the party has shifted ever further left the Democrats abandoned the working man for a base of victimhood fostered on the identity politics of race, gender, sexual preference, nationality (illegal immigration), and abortion, all supported by academia. As much as I wish Trump had won strictly on his own merits and platform the reality is that the democrats have been self destructing for some time as demonstrated by their continued losses of elected positions in all levels of government over the last years. Now, instead of the introspection one would expect after such losses they are doubling down on their new tactics. Witness the real nuts that they give voice to for the DNC leadership and the demonstrations.
    The fact is this is quite different than what we have seen before and most of us regular joes find it despicable. And the press, still in the their bubble and blissfully ignorant or in denial of these fundamental changes, continues to believe that it’s going to be democrat support business as usual but they’re wrong and their ratings are showing it.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Lets keep the left moronic …

      You are onto something, RAH.

      I’ve read about a celebrated polymath in the Habsburg Empire who believed that criminal leanings show in early childhood and can’t be rooted out by upbringing. All we can do is make the budding young criminals dumber and easier to catch by misleading them about life of crime. He advocated writing—and wrote himself— fairy tales for children where little Johnny wants to go stealing and he wonders how to get some good tips. He realizes that policemen know what stuff is stolen the most so he visits a precinct station to inquire about the best places. The friendly officers explain everything to him and even take him around to point out the right homes and businesses to rob. Johnny thanks them, steals a lot of nice things and lives happily ever after.

      Now, some people claim this Austrian-Hungarian polymath was a fictional figure that never existed but I don’t care because I think the idea is sound. We should write fairy tales for budding young Leftists about how to win or overturn elections and live happily ever after. I was thinking about writing some myself but the field is already crowded by professional Leftists. They have plenty of think tanks, media and politicians doing exactly that.

      Has Washington Gone Crazy?

  3. u.k.(us) says:

    “climate change denier”, sounds like a thing, until you deconstruct it.

  4. Joe says:

    Wow, it’s like David didn’t even read what Tony wrote at all.

  5. Shooter says:

    Would this be considered fake news? Given the fallout over the NOAA temperature fraud, looks like they’re trying to backtrack:

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/thorough-not-thoroughly-fabricated-the-truth-about-global-temperature-data/

    • AndyG55 says:

      Probably one of the most AGW BIASED arcicle yet written.

      Riddled with so many assumption that have proven basically INCORRECT.

      eg our esteemed host has shown that TOBs makes very little difference

      We know UHI does make a big difference

      The new electronic thermometers have nbeen show to read high not low.

      ALL OF THEIR ADJUSTMENTS are either BOGUS (tobs), under-applied (uhi) or done in the WRONG DIRECTION (new thermometers and screens)

      Add on top of that, the deliberate removal of cooler station in latitudes plus the purposeful warming introduced using homogenisation, and you have one massive FARCE.

      • Gail Combs says:

        ‘…our esteemed host has shown that TOBs makes very little difference..”

        Not only that but tests done and explained in a 1918 textbook Meteorology: A Text-book on the Weather, the Causes of Its Changes, and Weather Forecasting by Willis Isbister Milham say:

        The observations of temperature taken at a regular station are the real air temperature at 8am and 8pm, the highest and lowest temperatures of the preceding 12 hours, and a continuous thermograph record…. [Richard Freres thermograph] ….these instruments are located in a thermometer shelter which is ordinarily placed 6 to 10 feet above the roof of some high building in the city. At a Cooperative station the highest and lowest temperatures during a day are determined, and also the reading of the maximum thermometer just after it has been set. The purpose of taking this observation is to make sure that the maximum thermometer has been set and also to give the real air temperature at the time of observation.

        Continue reading page 77 on.

        If a good continuous thermograph record for at least twenty years is available, the normal hourly temperatures for the various days of the year can be computed….

        “the average temperature for a day is found by averaging the 24 values of hourly temperature observed during that day”

        If the normals are based on twenty years of observations, it will be found that there is not an even transition from day to day, but jumps of even two or three degrees occur….

        I thought it quite interesting that Willis Isbister Milham was talking about 20 years of hourly data in 1918.

        On page 68 Milham says a thermometer in a Stevenson screen is correct to within a half degree. It is most in error on still days, hot or cold. “In both cases the indications of the sheltered thermometers are too conservative.” That is the real temperature is hotter or colder than the temperature recorded.

        Instructions were written and given out to the co-op observers in 1882. There were two thermometers, one max and one min.

        For the maximum thermometer they state:

        “…When a maximum thermometer is not read for several hours after the highest temperature has occurred and the air in the meantime has cooled down 15° or 20°, the highest temperature indicated by the top of the detached thread of mercury may be too low by half a degree from the contraction of the thread….”

        That would indicate the max thermometer should be read just after the heat of the day and any adjustment for reading at the wrong time of day should RAISE the maximum temperature not lower it!

        Yet Zeke Hausfather stated @ Judith Curry’s
        “Back in the 1940s virtually all the stations used liquid-in-glass thermometers, which read about 0.6 degrees warmer in max temperatures (and about 0.2 degrees colder in min temperatures) than the new MMTS instruments introduced in the 1980s. This means that actual max temperatures (as measured by MMTS instruments) would have been ~0.6 degrees colder, and contribute part of the reason for adjusting past temps downwards.”

        This hogwash was based on one very limited ClimAstrologist study.

        Klaus Hager carried out a study comparing MMTS and Glass thermometers side by side for a period of 8.5 years and found that the MMTS gave a mean difference that was 0.93C warmer. Klaus Hager is a 44-year veteran German meteorologist and wrote a peer-reviewed paper on his findings. http://wkserv.met.fu-berlin.de/Beilagen/2013/Autom%20WSt_Hager.pdf

        Another peer-reviewed study Sensor and Electronic Biases/Errors in Air Temperature Measurements in Common Weather Station Networks by Lin et. al. concluded:

        Therefore, the RSS errors in the MMTS are from 0.31° to 0.62°C from temperature -40°C to -50°C (Fig. 5)… For the HO-1088 sensor, the self-heating error is quite serious and can make temperature 0.5°C higher under 1 m/s airflow, which is slightly less than the actual normal ventilation rate in the ASOS shield (Lin et al. 2001a). http://ams.allenpress.com/archive/1520-0426/21/7/pdf/i1520-0426-21-7-1025.pdf

        In the peer reviewed study “Air Temperature Comparison between the MMTS and the USCRN Temperature Systems” Hubbard et. al. concluded:

        Although the MMTS temperature records have been officially adjusted for cooler maxima and warmer minima in the USHCN dataset, the MMTS dataset in the United States will require further adjustment. In general, our study infers that the MMTS dataset has warmer maxima and cooler minima compared to the current USCRN air temperature system.” http://www.homogenisation.org/files/private/WG1/Bibliography/Applications/Applications%20(F-J)/hubbard_etal.pdf

        Now Dr. Bill Johnston a retired scientist has found the same problem with Australian MMTS temperature records and a lot more…
        On the quality of Australia’s temperature data by Dr. Bill (WH) Johnston.
        (Former NSW Department of Natural Resources Senior Research Scientist.)

        CONCLUSION: NOAA’S TOBS ADJUSTMENTS ARE NOT JUSTIFIED!

    • Andy DC says:

      Tons of gibberish that basically say that the foxes are in the chicken coop with billions at stake, and that those foxes can and will butcher the data any way they please, in order to confirm the highly profitable conclusion of catastrophic warming.

  6. Ross says:

    Does anybody know if this is accurate?

    http://voiceofamericatv.com/category/being-american/

    If so it explains why President Trump has been relentless in the past week about the MSM. He’s getting all the US citizen’s attention focused on what is going to happen over next few days.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Anything that uses computer generated voices can be treated with the contempt it deserves, and filed immediately in the porcelain file.

  7. RAH says:

    You had to know that this was coming. Whenever Republicans get the power you will see this kind of BULL HOCKEY! This is very fake news!

    POLL: Americans Want Democrats to Work With Trump!

    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/320229-poll-americans-want-democrats-to-work-with-trump

    The democrats lost their majorities in Congress because the American people rejected their platform. Then they lost the presidency. But now Americans want the democrats to water down Trumps agenda and the very actions he promised he would carry out if elected? A total lie, as always.

  8. RAH says:

    More fake news. Another story we can always count on when there is a Republican president in power:

    Lawmakers say Trump’s words matter — and hurt the country’s standing abroad
    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/lawmakers-say-trump%E2%80%99s-words-matter-%E2%80%94-and-hurt-the-country%E2%80%99s-standing-abroad/ar-AAn4Tqk?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

    The press remains under the delusion that they retain the ability to undermine a Republican president using their same old playbook.

    • Gail Combs says:

      WHAT STANDING?

      After the 8 year Obummer apology tour we are nothing but a laughing stock.

      The Yellow Stream Media along with the US education system are nothing but a fifth Column for the Communist Totalitarian World Government.

      Obummer bowed to EVERYONE…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.