If You Like Your Traitorous Lying Democrats, You Can Keep Your Traitorous Lying Democrats

After repeatedly releasing wiretapped Trump admin phone calls for weeks, Obama denies that there was a wiretap.

Minutes later, Dem political operative Howard Dean confirms that there was a wiretap, and says they only wiretap terrorists.

After years of wiretapping journalists.

And foreign leaders.

You really can’t make this stuff up.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to If You Like Your Traitorous Lying Democrats, You Can Keep Your Traitorous Lying Democrats

  1. Gail Combs says:

    I really really wish citizens could bring charges of treason against Congress Offal.

  2. Windsong says:

    You may have seen John Mcafee’s comments on “Russian hacking” from late last year, but take note of his thoughts on the NSA in the last two paragraphs.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Russian hackers….

      Mind you, probably all that would have been needed to get past Hillary’s or Obamy’s computer security.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      McAfee argues that the report is a “fallacy,” explaining that hackers can fake their location, their language, and any markers that could lead back to them. Any hacker who had the skills to hack into the DNC would also be able to hide their tracks, he said

      “If I was the Chinese and I wanted to make it look like the Russians did it, I would use Russian language within the code, I would use Russian techniques of breaking into the organization,” McAfee said, adding that, in the end, “there simply is no way to assign a source for any attack.”

      The most maddening thing in this affair is that any intelligence trainee was taught the cover-up principles long before computer hacking became an issue. If professional spies leaves tracks, they usually want them found. Their adversaries know that and they can only guess what levels of double-deception is in play and what was the primary goal of the break-in.

      If it was the Russians who broke into the DNC servers and found incriminating stuff, and if they are as good as everybody says they are, they could have made this assumption:

      If Hillary wins—as everyone expects—the reports of her duplicity will weaken her and we may keep her guessing what other goods on her we have. If Trump wins unexpectedly, the Democrats and their Deep State organization will try to pin Russian cooperation on him and weaken his administration. It’s a win-win for us. Let’s leave Russian fingerprints.

      Of course, the Chinese could achieve similar and additional benefits for themselves by leaving, ehm, Russian fingerprints.

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        Maybe that’s the Democrats’ next talking points:

        The Chinese did it! We have phone calls transcripts of the Trump people talking to the Chinese! The janitors at the Trump Tower are using mops made in China! We must investigate and impeach Trump!

      • Gail Combs says:

        The whole Russian hacked DNC is NOTHING but Dis-info.

        The FBI was not allowed to investigate and instead relies on proofs provided by the cyber security firm Crowdstrike ‘owned’ by Dmitri Alperovitch, a Russian ex-pat who hates Russia.
        ” ..the malware used was an out-dated version just waiting to be found. The one other interesting point is that the Russian malware called Grizzly Steppe is from Ukraine. How did Crowdstrike miss this when it is their business to know?…”
        More at my comment HERE

        E.M. Smith has a lot on Hacking HERE

        Meanwhile a Reddit post comment points out how Guccifer used Russian proxy servers to go undetected. Therefore the FBI is well aware that independent crackers use this method of hiding their tracks. This adds to the mud all over the intel community’s face.

        More likely is Seth Rich as Whistleblower. He was a data analyst and was the DNC’s Voter Expansion Data Director. He was murdered and motive and suspects are still unknown.

        THE DAY AFTER Julian Assange announced Seth Rich may have been his source by offering a $20,000 reward, a man climbs Trump tower, taking all of the media coverage away from Assange and Rich. Also accusing Russia helps keep the focus off the murdered Seth Rich and helps promote Soros much wanted war with Russia.

        The police try to say that it was a robbery gone wrong but as some guy said “Some cat dumps 4 bullets into a young wealthy extremely well dressed dude & don’t roll him , amazing. Now we hear wiki leaks lawyer was hit by a train….” And then Assange is denied access to the Net.

        OH and Where is Eric Braverman? ( Former Clinton Foundation CEO )

        • SxyxS says:

          Many people from a “specific” group of interesst dying against all odds is not new.
          Happened with several witnesses of JFK assassination(let’s not forget E Howard Hunts deathbed confessions)
          and something that is called Arkancide((the special ability of people who have troubles with Clintons dying very fast))

  3. John B. says:

    Old Democrat talking point: transcripts exist of Team Trump’s phone calls with Russians AND the campaign colluded to hack the DNC and John Podesta to rig the election.

    New Democrat talking point: Trump’s phones were not tapped.

    Folks, you can’t have it both ways! One of the above talking points is fake news.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Making mutually exclusive accusations is the Democrat way to keep a 500 batting average. Actually better than that because the media does not call the misses.

      • RAH says:

        This one isn’t going away. Seems to me that president Trump has just called the oppositions bluff. I hope hard evidence of the presidents allegations see’s the light of day. If it does the shit is really going to hit the fan. The FISA court that authorized it will have to produce the evidence of probable cause for authorizing the taps and I suspect it will be so flimsy as to be nonexistent. The democrats, their press, and the deep state will be exposed in a way never seen before. This could a real bomb shell!

  4. John B. says:

    “No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you.”

    Ben Rhodes is FOS: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-04/obama-advisor-rhodes-wrong-president-can-order-wiretap-and-why-trump-may-have-last-l

  5. frederik wisse says:

    Why is not here a us citizen organisation creating a civil suit against your previous president in which he MUST personally testify and be forced to explain what he did and why he did it ? In the worst case he should be accountable to your highest court .

    • Gail Combs says:

      Unfortunately the USA has a rule that no one can bring suit unless harm was done directly to them. Mallory of Junk Science had built a really good case against the EPA where they had used humans in trials WITHOUT TELLING THEM of the dangers involved. In one case the person even died. The judge tossed the case because Mallory ‘lacked standing’.

      ….The lawsuit claimed the experiments were illegal in that they blatantly violated virtually every major standard developed since World War II for the protection of human study subjects used in scientific experiments.

      Given that the EPA long ago determined that any exposure to PM2.5 could cause death (as well as a host of other serious health consequences) within hours or days of inhalation, the experiments are fundamentally illegal. Federal regulations and the Nuremberg Code strictly prohibit scientists from treating human subjects like expendable guinea pigs. In the experiment in question, the study subjects were asked to risk their very lives for $12 per hour.

      Then again, the study subjects really weren’t “asked” to risk their lives, since the EPA researchers failed — and, in fact, refused — to warn them that PM2.5 could kill them. At the very least, exposing study subjects to a dangerous and deadly toxin without their consent is also known as “assault and battery.”

      To Judge Trenga, however, the important thing apparently was to nitpick to death the effort to stop the experiments with a narrow reading of the federal rules of civil procedure.

      Judge Trenga determined that the EPA’s decision to endanger the lives of its study subjects, including inducing them to sign a fraudulent consent form, did not constitute a “final agency action” under the Administrative Procedures Act. Judge Trenga also determined, as the American Tradition Institute was not being harmed by the experiments, it didn’t have standing to pursue the case.……






  6. RAH says:

    Three personal experiences I had dealing with the traitorous left and press:
    1. As a relatively newly minted US Army special forces soldier I was ordered to volunteer to be part of an Army recruitment effort. One SF soldier of each specialty in SF job, or IOW four of us, all junior, were required to assist in recruitment efforts in a recruiting district centered around Pittsburg, PA that included the northern spike of West Virginia and the SE corner of Ohio.
    We visited two High Schools a day. The format of our presentations varied from one place to another depending on what the local recruiter had arranged. At this particular HS our presentation was in the form of a layout which included all kinds of weapons including sub machine guns. The weapons were functional but not loaded. The only loaded weapon was the M-1911A1 side arm the weapons man carried as required when transporting functional weapons.
    I laid out my medical equipment, the commo man laid out communications equipment, the demo man laid out engineering equipment and inert demolitions, and the weapons man laid out weapons. Classes of kids would walk through and ask us questions.

      As a rule at the first HS we would visit in the morning we would eat lunch in the school cafeteria with the kids. 
    We had been told to wear our Green Berets inside as a PR gimmick I guess. So standing in line with the kids waiting to go into the cafeteria a teacher comes by and says abruptly “Take your hat off”! I asked him to identify himself and he said as he reached to snatch my beret from my head “I’m the assistant principle”. I blocked his hand and started to do a wrist lock on him to put him to his knees but thought better of it and released his hand but it got the message across. Then I said “Is this how you treat guests to your school? I am wearing this beret because I was told to.”. He said “no one wears hats inside this school”. My response “Then ask me to remove it in a civil manner and I will”! He walked off without a word.
    Was his intent to embarrass me, denigrate the service in front of the kids, or perhaps to enhance his own prestige with the kids I don’t know but his manner made it clear that he probably had one or more of those objectives in mind. They will do anything to win and make their point and one just has to understand that and deal with it on their terms or your lost.  It was all worth it in the end because I met my future wife on that trip.

    2. In January of 1983 the SF A team I was on conducted Alpine and cold weather operations training for a Battalion of the now deactivated 11th Reserve Special Forces group at what was then Camp McCoy and now Fort McCoy, WI. A reporter and photographer from a local paper (my memory is a bit fuzzy but I think it was the paper in Madison, WI) was authorized to do a story on the training. It was made clear to them that they could take no pictures of the faces of any member of our team. They did and we caught them, exposed their film and they were escorted off the post.

    3. In January 1984 my team was part of the two team MTT (Mobile Training Team) deployed to the vicinity of Beirut, Lebanon to train the best unit in the LDF (Lebanese Defense Force) in LRRP (Long Range Reconnaissance Patrolling) operations. It was a very dangerous time in Lebanon and especially around Beirut. While we were there CIA station chief Bill Buckley was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered. (A real unsung hero).
    The US media kept trying to find out where we were working out of. This was in the days before the rise of cable news so it was the major networks of NBC, CBS, and ABC that had people on the ground there trying to do a story on us. We avoided them and when they caught up with us when we were out and about we ran them off. We and others from the US military mission misled them as to where we were operating from and sure enough on national news CBS ran a story complete with pictures of the building they had been told we were operating from.  My wife, watching for any news she could get on what was going on over there taped it and showed it to me when we got back.

  7. When Jeff Sessions recused himself on TV earlier in the week he was enjoying himself with a twinkle in his eye. He already knew that the “False News” narrative about Russians colluding with the Trump campaign was about to backfire.

    This scandal will show that Obama was far more corrupt than Richard Nixon. Too bad we can’t impeach him but you can expect jail time for some of his “Deep State” operatives.

    You will know that this battle is won when the lilly livered, spineless, two-faced Republican “Leadership” jump on this band wagon.

  8. PhilJourdan says:

    It is a joy to watch the democrats proven liars, and tripping over themselves to deny what they have already said!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.