Spectacular Climate Fraud From The World Bank

I signed up a for a World Bank climate course.  The very first slide was this one, which shows sea level rise accelerating after 1930, and continuing to rise quickly until the present.

This is fake data. In 1982, NASA’s James Hansen (the world’s top climate alarmist)  showed sea level essentially flat from 1950 to 1975.

https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1982/1982_Gornitz_go05100g.pdf

I overlaid the two graphs at the same scale. After 1950, the World Bank graph is completely fake.

The climate scam can’t exist without these kind of fraudulent graphs, which is why I spend so much time documenting them.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

46 Responses to Spectacular Climate Fraud From The World Bank

  1. GeologyJim says:

    Thanks Tony.

    You are the absolute modern champion of climate data integrity

    History (historical data) is the bulwark against model-driven hysteria, unless those data are “adjusted” by climate liars.

  2. John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia says:

    Sydney tide gauge records at Fort Denison (a mid harbour island) show about an 8 cm rise from about 1885 to 2010, Tony. They quote a rapid 0.65, +/- 0.10 mm/year. I don’t think anyone should bother rushing to sell their multi-million dollar homes at that rate.

  3. Robertv says:

    The climate scam can’t exist without the funding/fake money printing of the Federal Reserve/ World Bank.
    Bribing / threatening the right people is expensive. Big Government / Brother is expensive.
    Like a cancer It will automatically destroy freedom and a healthy economy.
    If Trump’s cure for this problem is more Big Government he is kicking the same can .

    https://youtu.be/ZHc7nWFTIl4
    Trump To Make Government Greater Again

    http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/images/charts/Annual_Inflation/Cumulative_Inflation_1913-2015_650.jpg
    Sea level rise is not the problem for We The People.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Robertv,
      Where in Hades are you getting that from?
      Trump is working to CUT regulations. He has already CUT the EPA and he is talking to small business people and small community banks about what would be GOOD for Main Street.

      Trump’s biggest problem is all the swamp critters that DO NOT WANT their $$$ and power taken away. They are SCARED TO DEATH! Why else do you think former US AG lynch is calling for blood in the streets?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hHvHhxozFc

      Why else do you think HIS OWN PARTY is fighting him tooth and nail?

      From Sundance on Obummercare… And the R.A.T. tennis game
      “Eyes left – thwack. Eyes right – thwack. Heads left – thwack. Heads right – thwack. Oooo…. Aaaah… Hot dogs, get your hot dogs here. THWACK wow… TWACK back ohhh… Left, thwack – Right, thwack… the game continues.”

      ObamaCare and The GOP: Two R.A.T Groups Fighting for Control – Both Filled With False Information and Many Lying…

      It’s obvious the financial interests are pouring in money to the R.A.T groups right now in the fight over ObamaCare Repeal and/or Replace. Boy howdy are they all fibbing as they fling their poo at each other. Forget the Democrats in this discussion….

      • Gail Combs says:

        OH…
        And never EVER forget the child s e x rings.

        Why the MSM Is Ignoring Trump’s S… Trafficking Busts?

        …As a strong advocate for s e x crime victims, I’ve been closely following the p e d o phile arrests since Trump took office. There have been a staggering 1,500-plus arrests in one short month; compare that to less than 400 s e x trafficking-related arrests in 2014 according to the FBI….

        As Stefan Molyneux pointed out in the video above, that many arrests in the first month means law enforcement HAS BEEN SITTING ON THE EVIDENCE for months to years… Think Podesta and pizza.

      • Robertv says:

        Let’s wait and see. At the moment he has a crippled economy that could collapse whenever Soros and friends want to. Of course the sooner the collapse the better to, with the correct policies of small government and free market , make America great again. So he could start by abolishing the Federal Reserve to give the power back to We The People.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Yes, the Fed is already making noises about raising the interest rate after saying they WOULD NOT because the economy was way too sluggish. Of course that was BEFORE the election.

          I THINK Trump could use an E.O. to get rid of the “Accord” that made the Fed completely independent of the US government since it was never a law, just a declaration by the Federal Reserve Bank.

          The biggest problem is the 60 votes in the Senate rule for initiating NEW laws. I think that maybe why he is going to focus on the Glass–Steagall law separating commercial and investment banking thought to be the caused the 2008 financial crisis. He could reinstate with only 51 votes.

          Trump is not God-Emperor (despite what the Ctrl-Left thinks) and has to work with a bought and paid for Uni-Party.

          “And the banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.” — Top Senate Democrat, Dick Durbin

          • gator69 says:

            Dick Durbin? Really? LOL

            Gail, Dick was part of the cabal that caused the banks to fail. Bush stood up to congrtess 17 times in 2008 alone, and each time the likes of Durbin would call him a racist, and thus sent the banks and the economy straight to Hell.

            For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted. Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President’s repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.

            2001
            April: The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

            2002
            May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

            2003
            January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years.

            February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that “although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations,” “the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them.” As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market. (“Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO,” OFHEO Report, 2/4/03).

            September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO’s review found earnings manipulations.

            September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact “legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises” and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.

            October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error.

            November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any “legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk.” To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have “broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards” and “receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE.” (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03).

            2004
            February: The President’s FY05 Budget againhighlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital, and called for creation of a new, world-class regulator: “The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore…should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator.” (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)

            February: CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to “not take [the financial market’s] strength for granted.” Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by “ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator.” (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, “Keeping Fannie And Freddie’s House In Order,” Financial Times, 2/24/04).

            June: Deputy Secretary of Treasury Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and called for reform, saying “We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system. Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System.” (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04).

            2005
            April: Treasury Secretary John Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying “Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America… Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system.” (Secretary John W. Snow, “Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee,” 4/13/05).

            2007

            July: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds invested in mortgage securities collapse.

            August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying “first things first when it comes to those two institutions. Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options.” (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, The White House, 8/9/07).

            September: RealtyTrac announces foreclosure filings up 243,000 in August – up 115 percent from the year before.

            September: Single-family existing home sales decreases 7.5 percent from the previous month – the lowest level in nine years. Median sale price of existing homes fell six percent from the year before.

            December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying “These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I’ve called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs – and ensures they focus on their important housing mission. The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start. But the Senate has not acted. And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon.” (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, The White House, 12/6/07).

            2008
            January: Bank of America announces it will buy Countrywide.

            January: Citigroup announces mortgage portfolio lost $18.1 billion in value.

            February: Assistant Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, says “A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully.” (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08).

            March: Bear Stearns announces it will sell itself to JPMorgan Chase.

            March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and “move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages.” (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08).

            April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and “modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by … helping people stay in their homes.” (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08).

            May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.
            “Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans.” (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08).
            “[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that – and Congress is making progress on this – is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator.” (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08).
            “Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans.” (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08).
            June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying “we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08).

            July: Congress heeds the President’s call for action and passes reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.

            Dodd-Frank is proof positive that banks do not run this country.

          • Gail Combs says:

            Gator,
            In over 100 years there have been only a handfull of Congress Critters that have gone against the Federal Reserve.

            And in those 100 years Congress has given more and more power to the FED until they actually flipped the finger at Congress when Ron Paul tried to get an audit. (wwwDOT)ronpaul.com/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/

            As you well know the Fed is now an ungoverned entity completely in control of the money supply and thus the US economy with ZERO real oversight by the US government. (The Fed hates small banks and always has. Destroying the small guys was part of why the FED was formed in the first place.)

            If you do the links you find the International Banking Cartel controls much of the transnational corporations so you get pressure from different groups all with strings leading back to the International Banking Cartel.

            “The study says 147 powerful companies control an inordinate amount of economic activity – about 40%. Among the top 50, 45 are financial firms. They include Barclays PLC (called most influential), JPMorgan Chase, UBS, and other familiar and less known names.

            Twenty-four companies are US-based, followed by eight in Britain, five in France, four in Japan, and Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands with two each. Canada has one.

            Moreover, “top ranked” companies “hold a control ten times bigger than what could be expected based on their wealth.” — Stephen Lendman

            “The centre of the cartel includes the following giants: Barclays, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Vanguard Group, UBS, Deutsche Bank, Bank of New York Mellon Corp, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Corp, and Société Générale.”

            The network of global corporate control:
            Full paper:
            http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.5728v2
            Abstract (rather longer than usual)
            http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025995

            This lists The Top 50 Control Holders
            http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/4217:the-network-of-global-corporate-control

            WHOSE, WHO, the actual people.
            Financial Core of the Transnational Corporate Class

            … identify in detail the people on the boards of directors of the top ten asset management firms and the top ten most centralized corporations in the world. Because of overlaps, there is a total of thirteen firms, which collectively have 161 directors on their boards. We think that this group of 161 individuals represents the financial core of the world’s transnational capitalist class. They collectively manage $23.91 trillion in funds and operate in nearly every country in the world. They are the center of the financial capital that powers the global economic system. Western governments and international policy bodies work in the interests of this financial core…

          • Gail Combs says:

            Remember Pascal Lamy brought up the recent ‘Economic Crisis’ along with CAGW as the reasons why we need a World Government?

            A few years ago the IMF said a 10% WEALTH CONFISCATION was needed to “restore debt sustainability,” and bring down public debt to pre-crisis levels of 2007. (NOT pay off debt but just bring it down.)
            http://www.forbes.com/sites/billfrezza/2013/10/15/the-international-monetary-fund-lays-the-groundwork-for-global-wealth-confiscation/

            We already had financial crisis in the USA and EU. Now The Bank for International Settlements says China and Canada are about to go into a Financial Crisis.

            I mentioned a Banking Cartel…
            58 global central banks belong to The Bank for International Settlements. Every two months, the central bankers of the world gather in Basel for another “Global Economy Meeting”. During those meetings, decisions are made which affect everyone. Those meetings are conducted in absolute secrecy. link

            As far as the ‘Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ‘ goes, you have to look at it from the point of view of those who WANT the USA to collapse. Does the Act help that along???

            Investopedia

            Criticism of Dodd-Frank

            Proponents of Dodd-Frank believe the act will prevent our economy from experiencing a crisis like that of 2008 and protect consumers from many of the abuses that contributed to that crisis. Unfortunately, limiting the risks that a financial firm is able to take simultaneously decreases its profit-making ability. Detractors believe the bill could harm the competitiveness of U.S. firms relative to their foreign counterparts. In particular, the need to maintain regulatory compliance, they feel, unduly burdens community banks and smaller financial institutions — despite the fact that they played no part in the recession.

            Such financial-world notables as former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, Blackstone Group L.P. (BX) CEO Stephen Schwarzman, activist Carl Icahn and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon also argue that, while each individual institution is undoubtedly safer due to capital constraints imposed by Dodd-Frank, these constraints make for a more illiquid market overall. The lack of liquidity can be especially potent in the bond market, where all securities are not mark-to-market and many bonds lack a constant supply of buyers and sellers.
            http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dodd-frank-financial-regulatory-reform-bill.asp

            So the law targets smaller community banks and makes the USA less competitive – SURPRISE!

            Once you realize the goal is NOT doing what is best for the USA but what is best for the Globalists, then puzzling things start making sense.

            OH, and during the last 30 years while middle Americans became poorer and our federal debt spiralled?
            ” In many countries the distribution of income has become more unequal, and the top earners’ share of income in particular has risen dramatically. In the United States the share of the top 1 percent has close to tripled over the past three decades, now accounting for about 20 percent of total U.S. income (Alvaredo and others, 2012).”IMF

          • Gator says:

            Gail, you should only quote Dick Durbin if you intend to mock him, or the left. Dick Durbin is what is wrong with this country, and anything he says is likely to be a lie or misdirection.

            The Fed is not a bank. You cannot, as a consumer, open a checking account or apply for a loan.

            This country would be much better off if bankers actually ran it.

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            Yes, Gator, I watched the whole disaster unfold during the Bush presidency. I believed he was sincere about his “compassionate conservatism” governmental philosophy and I worried about its implications for policy. I was pleasantly surprised his administration kept warning about the risks of extending credit to credit-unworthy parties and undermining key financial institutions.

            Democrats and the rest of the Left reacted to it the way they always do by calling their opponents racists, with powerful support from the media.

            It created the perfect storm and the critics of this Congress-backed insanity ended up being blamed for it while the perpetrators were put in charge of “fixing it”.

            The resulting financial crisis was a huge strategic win for the big government Left, giving us Dodd-Frank, 8 years of Obama and doubling of the national debt, with far-reaching consequences for the future of the country.

          • gator69 says:

            I vividly remember reading about the push for high-risk lending in TIME magazine, in or around 1996, and thinking that it was absolutely nuts and would end badly. And this was before I ever worked for a bank. I had been a repoman in East St Louis when I was young and bullet-proof, and I had seen what that community did to any “investment” that was made in it. As one of my black coworkers said to me, “You can’t have anything nice down here, because someone will trash it out of jealousy and stupidity”.

            Change comes from within.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Robertv,

          Do not forget that the Communists WANT the USA to collapse so they can step in and establish a dictatorship.

          The whole reason for destroying the USA is to DESTROY the only government build on the idea that the government SERVES the people and not that the people are serfs of the state.

          In ~1910 the Russian Tsar was trying to set up a system similar to that of the USA/UK. That is why the central bankers (US Federal Reserve) took out the new government and installed the Communists.

          That is why Walter Duranty LIED about the Holodomor, the brutal artificial famine imposed by Stalin.
          Duranty’s reports from Moscow were crucial because they allowed the Banker’s man, FDR, the ability to grant the Soviet Union diplomatic recognition in 1933 and deny the Ukrainians aid without a backlash from the American Public.

          • Robertv says:

            Communists, fascists, progressives, environmentalists etc are just the brown shirts in this game.

          • Gail Combs says:

            They are the useful idiots for the political/banking Elite.

            Notice who owns much of Shell Oil. The Dutch and British Royals, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.

            Notice who wrote Agenda 21 — Ged Davis VP of Shell. Notice a President of Shell Oil is part of Muller Assocs. The same Muller who gave us BEST. Notice Shell Oil, BP and Standard Oil money (Rockefeller Foundation) funded the start of CRU

            Notice who were the presidents of WWF, The Dutch and British Royals and the ‘Old Man’ of Shell.

          • Robertv says:

            Yep If you follow the money there is where the road ends or begins.

          • Robertv says:

            Those people must have one big frustration. With all the money and power they have they are still mortal like the rest of us.

  4. gator69 says:

    World Bunk?

  5. Brad says:

    Why is the world bank giving classes on global warming? Is NOAA going to start giving lectures on the wonders of fiat currency?

    • Robertv says:

      World Bank = New world Order

      • Gail Combs says:

        Oh Yes definitely!

        Former World Trade Organization Director-General Pascal Lamy tells you so point blank

        Half a century ago, those who designed the post-war system — the United Nations, the Bretton Woods system, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) — were deeply influenced by the shared lessons of history.

        All had lived through the chaos of the 1930s — when turning inwards led to economic depression, nationalism and war. All, including the defeated powers, agreed that the road to peace lay with building a new international order — and an approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereignty… (wwwDOT)theglobalist.com/pascal-lamy-whither-globalization/

        First Franklin D. Roosevelt was president from 1933 to 1945. He is the guy who forbid the owning of gold by US citizens, confiscated it and gave it to the bankers. He also gave us the New Deal and the Yuge government bureaucracy we are now plagued with. (He is my most hated president, Clinton and Obummer are second and third..)

        Second the Bretton Woods system was established in 1944. It was written by Communist spy, Harry Dexter White and Fabian Socialist John Maynard Keynes.

        It set up the much hated World Bank, IMF and and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Bank. IBRD is the original World Bank institution. Currencies were pegged to gold.

        NM Rothschild ‘chaired’ the meeting setting those gold prices daily for the last 200 years source

      • Robertv says:

        Don’t forget the Bush family who gave you the Patriot Act. They’ll never waste a crisis to take power away from the people.

  6. Gail Combs says:

    WHAT IS IN IT FOR THE BANKS?

    World Bank Carbon Finance Report for 2007
    The carbon economy is the fastest growing industry globally with US$84 billion of carbon trading conducted in 2007, doubling to $116 billion in 2008, and expected to reach over $200 billion by 2012 and over $2,000 billion by 2020

    Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after ‘Danish text’ leak: Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement…

    …The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

    The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as “a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks”….

    From a 2009 Jo Nova article.

    The US government has provided over $79 billion since 1989 on policies related to climate change…

    Carbon trading worldwide reached $126 billion in 2008. Banks are calling for more carbon-trading. And experts are predicting the carbon market will reach $2 – $10 trillion making carbon the largest single commodity traded….

    http://joannenova.com.au/2009/07/massive-climate-funding-exposed/

    Do not forget the banks get a slice and the government gets a slice every time the money changes hands. That is why they absolutely HATE cash transactions and put in that nasty provision in obummercare. It required small businesses to report ALL cash transactions INDIVIDUALLY. Businesses raised he!! and got it removed.

  7. Edmonton Al says:

    Thanks again Tony for all your great work……..
    It seems to me that your data will become extremely useful over the next few months as the swamp gets drained.
    Then there will be honest climate data available.

  8. Jeremy Crick says:

    James Hansen more or less started the process whereby government after government fell for the junk science of the climate alarmists at that infamous Senate Committee hearing into climate change on June 23 1988, where its alarmist advocate chairman, Senator Wirth, deliberately chose the historically hottest day of year AND buggered up the air-con by opening up the windows just so everyone – bathed in sweat – got the message!

    Thanks, in large part, to your detailed examination of historical climate data, we now have clear evidence of scientific fraud on an industrial scale that is costing the whole world trillions in utterly pointless attempts to mitigate a problem that doesn’t exist.

    Would it not be fitting, therefore if it was another Senate Committee that called time on this outrage by conducting hearings into data manipulation by NOAA and NASA? Exposing this fraud in an official public hearing would give the world a Eureka moment so potent that the warmists’ grip on the public imagination would evaporate. The seismic shift in political fortunes ushered in by the Trump administration have, for the first time, made it possible not only to challenge the “consensus” but to crush it.

    A Senate Committee hearing has to be the way forward.

    • Gail Combs says:

      A Senate Committee hearing has to be the way forward.

      ONLY if you have honest senators. One can hope.

      • RAH says:

        There wouldn’t be any senators at a meeting if only honest ones were allowed to show so I’ll settle for any that are on the side of reason.

      • Jeremy Crick says:

        If Tony Heller happened to be called as an expert witness, before the guys from NOAA and NASA appeared, the senators would be left in no doubt that scientific malpractice had become institutionalised. They’d also have plenty of ammunition to work with – clear before-and-after graphs showing how raw data has been manipulated.

        • Gail Combs says:

          That is all our hopes and probably why Tony has been invited to speak so many times recently. It allows him to practice for ‘The Big Event’

  9. Kris Johanson says:

    Very few people grasp that the Government doesn’t create our money. Our money is created by a private bank – or perhaps you could say bank cartel – by making a bookkeeping entry and LENDING it to the Government. YOUR TAXES are the source of the interest payment on that “bookkeeping entry”. Nothing of value was created in this transaction; it was entirely a book entry – or at best, the printing of some fancy-looking paper. Your money is NOT CREATED by the Government. It is purely a fiction created by clever people who convinced your Government to give them a monopoly on its creation.

    It gets worse: the money to pay the interest HAS NOT BEEN CREATED in the above transaction. If the government needs $100, the extra $5 to pay the interest IS NOT CREATED (it is not printed). Therefore, you are perpetually in debt because you have to keep borrowing to pay off the principal.

    So you have in effect set up a PRIVATE COMPANY and given it a MONOPOLY on printing money, and then passed a law stating that these pieces of paper are “legal tender for all debts, public and private”, so that I will GO TO JAIL if I don’t accept your paper for my goods & services.

    This system was set up in 1913 by President Wilson. Then, in 1933, ALL GOLD WAS CONFISCATED from the American public by an executive order of President Roosevelt. If you had gold coins, you were required by law to head over to your nearest Federal Reserve Branch and TURN IT IN. In return, you got pieces of paper that were tied to your gold deposit. Until 1971, all of these pieces of paper were at least backed to some degree by gold. In 1971, President Nixon busted up that system and so you now have what is called “fiat money”. It is not your money – your Government didn’t create it – it was created on the books of a private enterprise that expects you to pay them interest through your TAXES.

    There is a famous well-written story which illustrates how this happens, called “Fabian the Goldsmith”. We cover it in High School Economics. http://www.nexgenacademy.org/uploads/5/9/2/6/59267515/the_story_of_fabian_the_goldsmith.pdf

    • Kris Johanson says:

      It seemed appropriate to post this here because the World Bank – and all central banks – want a certain amount of FEAR AND CRISIS. That’s how they make money, because Governments must BORROW during times of crisis. Our Central Bank (Federal Reserve) was created in 1913 along with our Income Tax in the same year (these go hand-in-hand). Why do you think we went off to war a couple years later? Because it was time to GO MAKE SOME MONEY. Perhaps this is a simplification, but it sure accomplished that purpose.

  10. Kris Johanson says:

    The Federal Reserve was created in 1913. Immediately followed by 100 years of money supply expansion.
    Prices don’t “rise”. Your money just GOES DOWN.

  11. Kris Johanson says:

    Here is the supply of money (I’m guessing this is M2) since around WWI.
    QE1, 2, 3 = “Quantitative Easing”
    This is why we are probably going to have massive inflation soon. Inflation is a TAX. Inflation is a tax, without calling it such.

  12. Kris Johanson says:

    This is the best 2-minute video on the predicament we are in right now. Enjoy!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKpVlDSIz9o

  13. John Doran says:

    Great info, thanks Tony & commenters.

    The Banksters puppet all, people & govts through bribery & blackmail.
    No problemo, as they’ve wangled the power to create limitless money (=power) out of thin air, without audit, as debt upon which we serfs & our children & grandchildren pay interest.

    The bookkeepers are running the world, & they’re diabolic creatures.

    My steps to this understanding were, amongst others, 2 youtube videos:
    Bill Still Money Masters 3.5 hrs.
    Retired Head of FBI Tells All 1 hr 4 mins
    Ted L. Gunderson uncovered the links between child sex abuse & the elites for blackmail. He was being poisoned with arsenic when he died.
    He recommends William Guy Carr’s book Pawns in the Game, the history of the Khazar Banksters gaining control down the centuries.
    Unfortunately, he uses the lazy shorthand term Jews, after pointing out he means Khazar Banksters. Carr spent 42 yrs researching for this & other books. He was a WWII Canadian naval intelligence officer, no mug.

  14. John Doran says:

    Other books:
    The Creature from Jekyll Island, G. Edward Griffin.
    The sneaky set up of the Fed, Christmas Eve, 1913, when the majority of Congress had gone home, an act probably unconstitutional.
    Also uncovers the “green” con, as aimed at the destruction of ALL govts towards a one world totalitarian govt.
    Griffin’s valuable newsletter is needtoknow.news

    Not covered so far in this thread is the NWO, UN Agenda 21 depopulation agenda.

    This is a major theme of arch Malthusian Paul Ehrlich, & his anti-humanist pupil Holdren, now thankfully away from the levers of power.
    Depopulation, & that the whole”green” hoax is a continuation of Brit/Rothschild Empire desire for global domination is a major part of Robert Zubrin’s book Merchants of Despair, which also shows how safe & clean nuclear power is demonised through the now discredited corporate media, & the hijacked hysterical “Left/Liberal” movement. Similar GMO advances in food production are similarly demonised.
    Zubrin is a PhD nuclear engineer, with 9 patents to his name or pending.
    He believes fusion power could be our pathway to the stars.

    The West is being held back from Progress.

    Zubrin makes frequent reference to Julian Simon’s book, The Ultimate Resource 2,
    which demonstrates convincingly, for me, that there’s no need for depopulation: right now we could feed 10 billion. Simon won a bet against Ehrlich & Holdren re commodity prices 1980 – 1990. The two geniuses were crying”We’re running out of resources, we’re all gonna die.” while Simon was looking at historical graphs showing commodity prices falling, ie becoming more not less available.

    A useful pointer to the 1%s plans is http://www.c3headlines.com
    Click on Quotes.
    Many good articles & graphs also.
    I live in hopes that Trump is the real deal. He’s made a good start, we should know by July, I reckon.

    John Doran.

Leave a Reply to Colorado Wellington Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.