Settled Science In Iceland

Settled science at NASA means constantly rewriting the past.  Here are a few of the NASA Reykjavik, Iceland temperature graphs I have captured over the past six years.

V2 Measured

V2 Adjusted


October 2017 V3 Measured Vs Homogenized



May 2018 Measured Vs. Adjusted

May 2018 Measured Vs. Homogenized

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Settled Science In Iceland

  1. R. Shearer says:

    It wasn’t lost to sea level rise years ago?

  2. Paul Fischbeck says:

    Can you add the year of each version to the graphics?

  3. John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia says:

    You have probably already seen this Tony, but the charts on this DMI webpage (see link below and figure below) seem to bear out your work above. It is obvious that the adjusted NASA plot is fantasy. I quote from the DMI page:
    “Over the past 130 years, temperatures in Greenland have shown a slight upward trend. Seen in a shorter time perspective, and apart from the warm decades of the 1930’s and 1940’s, temperatures have been decreasing. This trend is primarily observed on the west coast that not until recent years started showing an increasing trend.”
    They give Copenhagen and Torshavn Annual Mean Temperatures as historical comparisons showing the obvious UHI effect as their populations grew:
    You are obviously infinitely more familiar than I with the subject but I did notice a paper discussed on the WUWT blog that there is a close fit of the Barent Sea water temperatures with the AMO:
    Cheers, keep up the good work and keep the photos coming.

  4. arn says:

    they just pulled another hockeystick.

    • Rah says:

      And I would be surprised if Mother Nature doesn’t slowly shove that stick up their wazzoo.

      Talked to my niece at a family function a couple weeks ago. She has always been a big believer in AGW and is a science teacher. She defended Mann and the EACRU years ago. She asked me to stop sending her links to posts from this blog and others back then Based on our conversation a couple weeks ago I got the distinct impression that she’s starting to see the light.

      • arn says:

        When people are emotionally deeply involved in things
        and are told that this is the best for humanity
        they become idealistic(=usefull&very predictable)
        Then reality and facts dont not matter to them.
        They will stick to their Allah/Mohammed and defend him
        even if the actions&scriptures of their very same gods and prophets proof them wrong and expose them as imposterd(eg. climate gate 1&2)

        Your niece should be more vulnarable to that kind of manipulation than average joe as she has chosen a hard job with a shitty
        and she by default can not imagine that people exist who are systematically missusing humanistic attitudes and good intentions to
        manipulate others.

        It is very hard to reach those people and it usually takes years because they have been programmed for years.
        (For me it was easy,because i simply welcomed global warming as i like warm weather and did not care about saving the world
        but the absence of warmer weather made me curious and the day i found that man made co2 was just 0.01% in our atmosphere while 3/4 of the planet is covered with evil climate gas h2o which is released in much huger numbers into the atmosphere and that scientists don’t give crap about this as they don’t give about the sun i knew
        that this all is completely blown out of proportions because a huge energy increase needs a huge change of atmospheric composition and not 0.01% of a harmless very weak trace gas when the sun is excluded as the main driver. )

        I think the best way to get those people back is awaken their natural curiosity(let them try to play devils advocate:to prove absence of AGW)
        and to show them that the truth does not need lies
        nor intimidations or alarmism and that science that pulls out wrong predictions and excuses in huge numbers is by definition not science but activism.

  5. Gerald Machnee says:

    Griff analysis???

    • Griff says:

      I have no particular knowledge to contribute…

      I do note another (unmentioned here) record heatwave in SE Asia – e.g Karachi…

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        Thank you for providing a homogenized and condensed description of your cult, Ms Griff.

      • arn says:

        On a planet with a size of half a million square kilometers
        you will not find a single year without unusual cold or heatwaves.
        Even during the climax of the ice age scare(even during the fradulent reference year 1979 which was unusually cold
        and which is now considered the most normal and best climate ever-while in fact very negative for humanity)
        you will find heatwaves.
        (and the lack of anomalies 100 years ago is due to poor coverage and non existent historic records in most parts of the world)

        Even the driest place on earth(=atacama)
        has been marshland when the first indians arrived there
        and even inka calendars were found there
        and the only reason why we can not trace back the path of immigration of those first indians is because the coast route they travelled 15.000 years ago is now buried by 100 meters of water.

        • RAH says:

          And now the only place habitable in that desert for about any multi-celled being is the coast. The only place that gets enough moisture from the frequent fogs for plants and animals to survive. According to Wiki there are weather stations that have never recorded any rainfall in the Atacama.

  6. Lire également : L’ Icelandgate, ou comment le GIEC (GISS/NASA) manipule les données météorologiques

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.