Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Daily Archives: October 22, 2024
“ACCURATE, RELIABLE, TRANSPARENT”
Dominion Voting says they are honest and transparent, while not allowing voters to reply or ask questions. A majority (55%) of Democrats think the cheat is coming. They are joined by 58% of Independents and 83% of Republicans.”
Posted in Uncategorized
16 Comments
The Safe Climate Of 1791
“According to NASA’s James Hansen, the safe upper limit for atmospheric CO2 is no more than 350 ppm. Based on the information provided in the search results, we can infer that CO2 levels in 1791 were considered safe.” “Flood history … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
