Another video comparing misinformation from traditional AI with actual data analysis by analytic AI.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
- Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- Earth Granted 26 Year Reprieve
- Ancient Astronauts
- Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- Global Communism To Save The Maldives
- Another Top New York Judge
- The Saudi Arabia Of Wind
- Defending The Faith
- 90% Certainty – Four Meters Of Sea Level Rise By 2030
- NOAA Climate Fraud Index
- 98 Degrees Too Hot For Phoenix Residents
- Global Warming Threatens The Children
- Defective Memories
- The Last Refuge
- Consensus Science From 1974
- Kennedy’s Big Oil Infatuation
- “Truman Says CIA Was Diverted From Its Original Assignment”
- 1939 Warmth And Drought
- Never Mind About Sea Level …
- Another Climate Migration
- April 14, 1886 Tornado Outbreak
- Making Junk Science History Again
- Warming Up The Climate
- “What If CO2 Is Not the Real Problem?”
Recent Comments
- arn on Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- Richard E Fritz on Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- arn on Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
- William on Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- gordon vigurs on Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
- arn on Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- Bob G on Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- Greg in NZ on Earth Granted 26 Year Reprieve
- Tel on Earth Granted 26 Year Reprieve
- Tel on Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
‘When you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of science’ – Lord Kelvin
The one thing conventional AI most certainly isn’t, is science. It is the ‘science’ politicians follow.
A system that only uses selective data can not be science.
As long as there is a “blasphemy filter” science means Agenda.