The Economist thinks hot weather in Brazil can sucker people into giving more money to their climate scam.
“Are climate negotiators ready for a chaotic COP in Brazil?
The climate meeting will be hot, humid and uncomfortable. That might help”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- Billyjack on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- Bob G on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Climate Correlation
- arn on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- arn on “most secure in American history”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- conrad ziefle on “most secure in American history”
- oeman50 on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
Hold the meeting in Patagonia.
Antarctica is the only liveable place left now.
But how can they be aware of that when they still do not know that the weather in a jungle is hot and humid and uncomfortable.
Especially when the meeting is in Brazil where the warming scam on a global scale started there in 1992 at the UN summit – the crminals return to the crime scene of the century.
And of course people who are surprised by Brazils climate
can easily predict the global climate for the next 50 years.
for old guys like me that remember… read and enjoy. https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/today-its-global-warming-in-the-70s-it-was-the-coming-ice-age
The oldest article I’ve found so far about the coming ice age is from Harper’s 1958 by Betty Friedan titled,well,
The coming ice age
THE Betty Friedan? The Founding Mother of “second wave” feminism (the Third Wave was the inevitable psychotic decompensation phase) who posited that womyn are manipulated into being mothers, a career-derailing dead end, in order that “men” get to have all the money and power. Later the first president of the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws that infringe on womyn’s constitutional rights. I had no idea before all that she was a Climate Scientist. If so she was a true visionary who recognized early on the intersectional nature of abortion “rights” with Climate Justice. I learn a lot here
The multi-use of front people is pretty common.
Gloria Steinem was CiA and 2nd wave feminist.
(and Smith College like Friedan – in case you haven’t been recruited in Harvard,Yale,Columbia oe Berkeley
Smith is the breeding ground for chicks )
Saakashwhilli? was Georgian president and the Governor of Odessa(the fact that he spoke even worse Ukrainian than Zelensky and not having a Ukrainian citizenship(he got it in 2015,lost it 2017,got it again 2019) helped him being qualified for that position)
And feminism.
Every branded generation got its own wave since the great reeducation project started.
The hippies got the 2nd,
gen X the 3rd,
GenZ the 4th wave.
Every artificial teen brand generation got its new wave of feminism
and the more rights they got the more aggressive they got – which is quite strange.
@arn – I’ll have to reply to myself again. I’m very familiar with Smith, in Northhampton MA. NoHo is notable for “artisanal” coffee shops and first-rate bookstores. And Smith, the breeding ground for angry militant lesbians. Not a safe place for menfolk. One of my college instructors, a Greek expat and member of The Party (she had to leave Greece in the late 60’s for junta reasons) as well as an absolutely ardent feminist wanted me to enroll in a one-of-a-kind postgrad Gender Studies program. At Smith. She said she would pull strings; it would look so good on my CV. I said I would consider it. I did for 1.73 seconds then politely declined. I should have taken her up on it. I could have been somebody! 🙂 Another multi-purpose agent was Mathilde Krim. Irgun gun runner, Mossad spy, LBJ’s paramour/seducer, and then abruptly a world-class microbiologist (she was a quick study) and the Foremost Expert on “HIV” who appeared on Oprah in 1990. Connect the dots if you have the time and interest. You’ll be amazed
I think I connected the dots pretty early on when I started looking into it as I’m full of bias and stereotypes = believer in pattern recognition and the where smoke,there fire logic.
Once I got into the free mason > east india company(blackrock is one of its new names these days) stuff,
and took a closer look at the dimise of the last 3 big empires that ended within a decade (Qing ended 1912,Russia 1917,Ottoman 1922)
alongside the convenient WW1 that ended with the league of nations = UN (take a look at the carplates of Archdukes Franz Ferdinands car he was shot in)
the common d(en)ominator became obvious.
And it’s not stuff you’ll find in history books.(I’m pretty sure 99.9% of turks including my uncle have no clue about Kemal Ataturks real background,but a 19th century demographic background check of his,now greece birthplace, will give us a hint).
But I’m not really interested in talking about that.
It’s all over the place anyway.
Btw – you should have taken the feminist offer.
You may have become an anxious, overweight,antisocial,suicidal sociopath with a dozen degrees of uselessness and feel miserable for the rest of your life,
but you would have pronouns in return and 72 genders to chose from and feel victimized.
I suppose the mentality that declares ‘the science is settled’ is most graphically illustrated by the Nazis who were ‘following the science’ of racial hygiene. This precedent ought to set the alarm bells ringing whenever some demagogue declares that his policies are dictated by ‘the science’. Skepticism is the foundation of science, so anything which is ‘irrefutable’ or ‘settled’ does not constitute science. Soothsayers and oracles might have their place in ancient history, but have no relevance to scientific discussion.
That a vast equatorial rain forest would be hot and humid is “unprecedented.” Who could have foreseen it? For that reason AC was not installed for the conference. Or perhaps the organizers took a page from James Hansen’s book and sabotaged it, thinking “that will help.” The kid kicking the battered soccer ball was asked for his input: “Huh? It’s always hot and humid. You get used to it.” Of course he’s too young to remember the 70’s Ice Age followed by late 80’s warmth. When the great Climate Profit Hansen demonstrated conclusively that cooling causes warming and vice versa
Is that film guru magician Al Gore on the invite list? Surely and verily it is foreseen: Unprecedented Snowfall In Brazil During COP30 … mark my words (and fingers crossed).