The EPA Considers All Life Forms To Be A Threat To The Planet

Almost all life forms emit either CO2 or CH4, which the EPA considers to be dangerous greenhouse gases.

Humans exhale 40,000 PPM CO2, which will eventually and inevitably become an excuse for the government to list humans as biohazards or other toxic waste.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to The EPA Considers All Life Forms To Be A Threat To The Planet

  1. Olaf Koenders says:

    I think the US EPA is working toward fitting catalytic converter masks to every animal on the planet. Gina McCarthy should go first.

  2. Tatiana Covington says:

    Especially when we fart!

  3. Sparks says:

    Steven there is an issue with using my regular e-mail address logging in to comment atm, I still have the address, but I’ve compensated temporally by changing the suffix of my address. I hope this is ok! 😉

  4. wwlee4411 says:

    Reblogged this on wwlee4411 and commented:
    I guess for the sake of the planet we need to start killing ourselves off even faster. Who’s going to be first to volunteer?

  5. Jayden Smith says:

    Reasonable commentary. Definitely not the most absolutely ridiculous thing I’ve ever read. No, definitely not. That’s probably another one of your posts.

  6. B says:

    Those who own government want power over all life functions. They just need to convince people to allow it.

    • Jayden Smith says:

      You mean corporations? I mean, when I eat Taco Bell it makes me fart, but I didn’t think it was them wanting to control me via government?

      …Ah, I see, Taco Bell have used their corporate power to lobby government to get a legislation passed which regulates them and forces them to put an ingredient in their food that makes your body create excess methane.

      • Straw man arguments make you look even stupider than you normally do.

        • Jayden Smith says:

          Firstly, it’s not a straw man argument. It’s a joke.

          But secondly, straw man arguments are much better than tin man ones. Straw is soft and comfortable to cuddle up with on a Sunday evening. Tin on the other hand, is hard. Which don’t get me wrong, would be great for sex, but terrible for cuddling afterwards.

  7. snedly arkus says:

    Quite awhile ago I was trolling skeptical science and came across rebuttals to things that DR Roy Spencer said. The two that come to mind are there is no such thing as urban heat island effect and that humans exhale as much carbon dioxide as they inhale. Of course I believed them, like so many do, because they know so much more about science than DR Spencer because the site is run by a cartoonist and an arrogant lying putz. Not. I haven’t been back since as how can anyone believe anything they say if they lie about the simple stuff. Says a lot about the IQ of those who continue to visit there.

  8. reformedii says:

    Does that exempt the braindead BO [BOstinks!] supporters?

  9. Sparks says:

    Karl W. Braun says:
    June 23, 2014 at 1:57 am

    “Lit farts are quite visible, indicating the presence of methane gas, whereas hydrogen would hardly be seen.”

    Hydrogen ignites exactly how you see it when people light their farts, how is this “hardly visible”?
    If your gut is producing large amounts of methane you would usually have a bacterial infection or an infestation of methane producing microbes of some sort, to cut a long story short, humans do not produce methane farts you idiot.

  10. phjefferies8 says:

    So the EPA wants to eliminate all life because of the CO2 produced, at that rate what are the trees going to use??

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *