http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/gifs/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on Four Years Past The Deadline
- conrad ziefle on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Gamecock on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- william on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- Francis Barnett on UK Sucking Carbon
- oeman50 on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
They will probably try and block you for anything from now on. Your too much of a menace to them by telling the truth. Time to get on to Inhofe ect
you’re
etc.
It should say “Congress has cut off funding for this phoney long range projection. You will need to buy your own hockey sticks from now on. We suggest Dicks Sporting Goods.”
Curious
The other explanation is that long range doesn’t agree with CAGW therefore you can’t be trusted to look at it . You might misinterpret the data. So they have to adjust the adjustments again. It’ll take some time, but just as soon as they do, the info will be available again.
I can assure you that if the long range forecast had agreed with CAGW it’d be all over the news.
Is there any chance that the following link now has the same information?
(Although accessed in a different manner)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/llarc.ind.php
Without knowing what you used to get there, I cannot be certain.
Farmer’s Almanac is far more accurate. Maybe the Farmer’s Almanac showed be made the official weather forecaster since the NOAA has become a “money pit”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a common and recommended practice to block directory access in webservers. All websites RFC:SHOULD do it. If the filename format is regular and known, you can just fill that in with dates to find what you want if it’s there. Insinuating a good web security practice is anything else is tinfoil hat territory.
Tony … intellicast still has updated NOAA links but I don’t know if it is the same as what u were after
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Temperature/Departure10.aspx
To get to the links you need to go into national, into temperature, into 10 or 30 or 90 day.
After last year, when they predicted a much above normal winter for the Midwest, they have apparently punted.
Looks like they moved it.
When does government ever admit a mistake?