Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- czechlist on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- D. Boss on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- D. Boss on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
100% Of US Warming Is Due To Data Tampering – The Ultimate Scientific Scam
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.



So, have you heard from Senator Inhofe’s office yet?
I seriously doubt that even Senator Inhofe is ready to hear the truth (that we ourselves have been so reluctant to admit):
The US National Academy of Sciences reviews budgets of federal research agencies for Congress to assure they promote the UN’s agenda.
That’s too bad, I was hoping it really was warming up just a little bit!
Global warming: just another term for nice weather.
And where do we find CO2 in this story ?
Time for a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Judicial Watch or Mark Levin?
Steve…. is the unadjusted graph from NCDC too? I am a daily visitor to your site and appreciate the work you do! Consider me a loyal lurker!
~ 100% of postmodern consensus science, including oscillating solar neutrinos, the Standard Solar Model, Dark Energy, attractive forces between neutrons, etc., owe their existence to data tampering.
Reblogged this on Help save our kids future.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
They try really really hard to make their theory work but they just can’t do it, can they!
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
I absolutely love these tampering articles. Good show Tony.
OH LOOK!!! It’s the Politically and Intellectually Blind trying to convince the Intellectually and Politically BLIND to follow them…..WTF is this article supposed to be anyway???…ZERO explanations… just two graphs and a Headline…… Where is YOUR SCIENCE??? Do YOU actually believe you can state anything about Science without any actual SCIENCE to back up your claim and not be ridiculed???
Moron alert
It really is a shame you are unable to read a simple graph and take out your frustration by lashing out.
The rest of us here know what the graph means and new comers who do not and ask politely get polite explanations, often by me.