This week, President Obama praised the idea of gun bans and confiscation – like the Nazis did in 1938 immediately ahead of the Holocaust.
He is doing the exact opposite of what he promised as a candidate.
You heard it right here on television, I won’t take your rifle away, I won’t take your handgun away.
That wouldn’t be so bad if the Repubs put up a whimper of protest. Unfortunately they will champion the legislation that will do the deed. Best thing that ever happened to Hussein’s regime is election of a Repub congress and senate. They have greased the skids for his entire devious schemes, better than the previous Demoncrats ever did. Oh, and don’t dream that Kevin McCarthy will be an improvement on tearful Boehner. I know his reputation well, he is ‘my congressman’. He has a history of kissing up to whomever is in power and giving them whatever they ask for, starting with the Governator and his Green Kalifornia initiatives.
Willy, that was not what I wanted to hear but not unexpected. Actually most people have figured it out.
Gallup: 60% of Americans Want a New Political Party. But, Why?
Was this destruction in our confidence in the US government carefully orchestrated in preparation for takeover? For the final destruction of our Constitutional Republic (whats left of it.)
Look at what Kent Clizbe has said:
Willing Accomplices: How KGB Covert Influence Agents Created Political Correctness and Destroyed America by Kent Clizbe
Let’s break that down:
Talk about peace, talk about social equality, especially among those most oppressed.
CHECK, — All the talk about ‘Social Justice’ and ‘Climate Justice’ (Whatever the heck that is) and #Black Lives Matter.
Talk about organization of labor, and penetrate into every labor union.
CHECK, — The labor unions are leftist and when Dad started a union in NYC, the mob muscled in and threatened to kill him and his family.
“total union political expenditures reached $925 million in the 2004 cycle… eight of the top ten all-time political contributors are labor unions.” (wwwDOT)unionfacts.com/article/political-money/
Publish pamphlets and papers. Orate and harangue.
CHECK, — Heck they move on to taking over our pre-schools, schools and universities! See Robin’s arcticles. For example: http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/destroying-the-dominant-social-paradigm-via-education-for-21st-century-political-power-and-personal-gain/
Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement, ‘Impossible lack of diversity’ reflects ideological intimidation on campus
(wwwDOT)washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/1/liberal-majority-on-campus-yes-were-biased/?page=all#pagebreak
Play on envy. Arouse jealousy.
CHECK, — George Soros,Obama and the rest of his buddies have been accomplishing this in spades!
(wwwDOT)washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all
(wwwDOT)washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/19/hired-black-lives-matter-protesters-start-cutthech/
Separate class from class.
CHECK — That seems to be the whole goal of Obama’s admin.
Try to break down the democratic processes from within.
CHECK — Can you say campaign $$$, bought and paid for media, voter fraud and the US government targeting of True the Vote?
https://web.archive.org/web/20121213095746/http://www.truethevote.org/news/how-widespread-is-voter-fraud-2012-facts-figures
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/06/True-the-Vote-Founder-on-IRS-I-Was-Targeted-Because-of-My-Political-Beliefs
Accustom the people to picketing, strikes, mass meetings.
CHECK — Occupy Wall Street (Again funded by Soros) and the black riots
Constantly attack the leaders in every way possible so that the people will lose confidence.
CHECK — Our ‘leaders’ are doing a darn fine job of it all by themselves.
Then in time of national peril walk into the capital and seize the power.
CHECK — Destruction of the US power grid, steep rise in prices, maybe hyper inflation and economic collapse with the blacks in the background all primed and ready to riot and destroy.
October 27, 2014 Ben Carson Warns of Obama Declaring Martial Law If Anarchy Cancels 2016 Election
If they do not get a Jeb Bush vs Hiltlery Dog and Pony show in 2016, I think this may very well be the fall back position.
Duke Power is very cozy with Obama and even lent him money for his last campaign and it is Duke Power that is closing down coal plants AND destroying them at record rates on the Eastern seaboard where most US cities are.
E.M. Smith (ChiefIO) a trained economist on Interesting Economic Order Of Market Fall 8/25/2015. As he says
The 1977 NYC blackout showed a poor economy and a riled up minority caused massive damage, fires and injures unlike the previous NYC blackout that was treated as a ‘fun event’ with little looting or damage.
On top of that Obama has made the world much more likely to end up in WWIII.
What an incredible mess the S.O.B. has left this country in.
Yes, we are in conflict with master propaganda artists who had essentially taken control of society worldwide before we started to awaken to the new reality.
Gail, did you think about these polls From Gallup-
Americans continue to name the government (18%) as the most important U.S. problem, a distinction it has had for the past four months. Americans’ mentions of the economy as the top problem (11%) dropped this month, leaving it tied with jobs (10%) for second place.
Though issues such as terrorism, healthcare, race relations and immigration have emerged among the top problems in recent polls, government, the economy and unemployment have been the dominant problems listed by Americans for more than a year.
http://www.gallup.com/file/poll/181964/MIP_Satisfaction_150311%20%20.pdf
ECONOMIC PROBLEMS (NET) % 33
Economy in general * 11
Unemployment/Jobs * 10
Federal budget deficit/Federal debt * 5
NON-ECONOMIC PROBLEMS (NET) % 75
Dissatisfaction with government/Congress/politicians
Poor leadership/Corruption/Abuse of power * 18
Immigration/Illegal aliens * 7
Poor healthcare/hospitals; High cost of healthcare * 7
Terrorism * 6
Education/Poor education/Access to education * 6
Ethics/moral/religious/family decline; Dishonesty * 5
National security * 4
Poverty/ Hunger/Homelessness * 4
Situation in Iraq/ISIS * 4
Foreign policy/Foreign aid/Focus overseas * 4
Race relations/Racism * 4
Here is Gallup’s list of problems. How many of the above do you consider to be the top problem and how many do you consider it is the governments handling that is the real problem. By my count Government or their handling or their meddling hits closer to 96% not 18%
3. In general, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States at this time?
Date———– 2009 May 7-9
Satisfied — 35%
Dissatisfied — 62%
Unsure – 3%
And this is the record lowest O-bama has been able to achieve for Dissatisfied on the direction of the country. all the rest were higher When every month of your Residency you have more than 62% of folks telling you are going the wrong way, it is a problem with leadership.
http://www.gallup.com/file/poll/181964/MIP_Satisfaction_150311%20%20.pdf
I would rate it 100% government for all of those listed problems.
Blogger Exposes Gallup Poll Bias Tailor-Made for MSM
And you can see a bit of that bias peaking out just in the numbers you posted.
I like Rasmussen because they are up front with what questions they ask and the questions are not twisted to give numbers that can then be fed to the media.
The Blair-Rockefeller poll is a real classic when it comes to designing a poll to give you numbers you can then feed the MSM to smear an opponent with. In this case it really worked. (At one point Rasmussen showed voters split 1/3, 1/3 and 1/3 with the Tea party right up there with the DemiRats and ReBooblicans. Not surprising given Americans are still saying they really want a viable third party.)
TABLE 2. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TEA PARTY WHITES & NON-TEA PARTY WHITES NATIONWIDE
asks most of the questions starting with:
“Do you think it is the responsibility of the federal government to…”
And on the basis of wanting small government they then declare the Tea party as Racist.
Another question:
“Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Our society should do whatever is necessary to make sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.” Give me a break. It is not my job or the government’s or society’s to wipe everyone else’s arse. As a ‘minority’ I hate the Progressives telling me I am too much of a wimp to succeed on my own without a helping hand from Big Brother. It is down right insulting!
This is the poll:
http://blairrockefellerpoll.uark.edu/5295.php
“I like Rasmussen because they are up front with what questions they ask and the questions are not twisted to give numbers that can then be fed to the media.”
You say that as if they’re two different things. They’re up front with the questions BECAUSE the questions aren’t twisted to give the numbers they want. Or perhaps the other way around. But you’ll never see one without the other. If schools were really about learning, they’d make sure everyone knew that an answer is meaningless without the question that was asked.
I think “42” sums it up pretty well.
Obama can go on about gun control all he wants. Nobody but his rich liberal sycophants and academics and some of their students take him seriously on that issue. Not even most blacks align with him on it. The rest of us live in the real world except the politicians and even most of them have figured out that nationally gun control is a losing issue.
Even as he rails the DC government has lost a big battle concerning their restrictions on gun ownership.
D.C. gun registration law ruled partly unconstitutional
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/09/18/d-c-gun-registration-law-ruled-unconstitutional/
GOOD NEWS! Thanks RAH.
“At the same time, the court upheld other requirements, including that gun owners be fingerprinted and photographed.”
They did 2 steps forward and 1 step back. They gained 1 and liberty lost 1. Step by step bit by bit. So where is the good news ?
Coming soon for the purchase of a knife a hammer or pressure cooker.
No liberty lost that wasn’t already lost before. The fact is that gun laws have come a very long way in DC in the last decade or less and the momentum is going against the gun grabbers there.
rah, you are such a killjoy. Everybody has the right to enjoy a little doom and gloom.
Colorado there is plenty of that to wallow in elsewhere even in the realm of defending the 2nd amendment. But this DC case was a win anyway one cuts it as have been the majority of cases involving the extraconstitutional gun laws in that place since 2008 when the SCOTUS found the Washington DC ban on handguns unconstitutional.
Legal battles on such issues when it involves an entrenched City Hall with a bottomless pocketbook for legal battles are usually gradual with multiple cases that nibble away at the central issue. It all moves at the rate of molasses over sandpaper. But the point is, it has been moving in the right direction in DC since 2008.
Yes, and everyone should hear President Reagan’s Christmas pony parable.
Not much can be done about that. People have different temperaments. One of the reviewers of Mark Steyn’s America Alone quipped:
“The most fun I’ve had being depressed”
Bad timing – just as Obama was citing Australia’s gun laws as a model a fifteen year old Muslim teenager murders a Chinese accountant in the street outside the police station where he worked.
The 15 year old is blasted to death in response and the mosque he frequented is raided.
Earlier this year another fanatic on bail for serious violent charges obtains guns and holds hostages in a Cafe in Sydney resulting in 3 deaths.
Let’s be honest – gun laws only inhibit the honest citizens of any country – criminals have a habit of disobeying the law or don’t people like Obama recognize this ?
Anytime the Government tries to ban anything that is in demand, it simply creates a black market run by mobsters of various stripes. You can pass all the anti-gun laws you want and it will never prevent criminals who want them from getting them.
“gun laws only inhibit the honest citizens of any country – criminals have a habit of disobeying the law”
Yes, exactly! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrBPoX7yMKo
Not quite true. Soviet scientists made great progress in this realm in the years 1917-1987. After some interim setbacks*) within the “New Soviet Man” project they came in the end very close to the creation of a new social class, the law-abiding criminal. Only the untimely collapse of the Soviet Union and the shutdown of her correctional and re-educational facilities thwarted the successful conclusion of the development. There is no reason why the Obama administration could not pick up the dropped Soviet baton and finish the race.
————————————————–
No, the victim was an Australian. Has a Chinese heritage but is an Australian.
Big changes in that in Australia since the days of WW II.
It ain’t just Australia!
He was an IT admin guy with a family working for the NSW police force in Parramatta.
The 15 year old islamic terrorist was given a gun and set loose.
The kids parents left Australia for Turkey the week before and his sister left the day before.
They need to be extradited and returned to Australia on charges of accessory to murder before the fact, and on suspected terrorism charges.
Chances of this happening following the Goldman Sachs coup of Australia’s government? zero is too high a number.
Why not just outlaw murder? Oh yeah…
That would never work.
Doh!
You of course know that in the mind of the gun grabbers murder with a firearm is far worse than murder using any other inanimate object. It’s almost as bad as any justified killing by a police officer if the perp has black skin.
Yes, murder is not always a “hate crime”, sometimes it is an act of love.
You have it all wrong. Legalize murder (like the legal infanticide we now have) and crime rate statistics improve immediately.
Or at least make gun ownership mandatory!
Of course this would never do. The Progressives do not want such an example out there.
Nelson, Ga. followed suit with the Family Protection Ordinance but was challenged by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. According to Huff and Puff the town lost the fight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQaI1N_t1FQ
A fundamental fact that most Americans don’t seem to understand. The Bill of Rights does not grant rights, it was written to preserve preexisting rights. The 9th amendment makes that very clear.
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
IOW we have rights far beyond what is expressed in the Bill of Rights or Constitution and the Federal Government has no Constitutional power to deny us those rights.
In the realm of the use of a firearm or any other weapon at hand this means that we have a fundamental right to protect the lives of ourselves, our family and our fellow man. This is what the founders called a “fundamental law of nature” and explicitly intended could not be “abrogated by any regulation of municipal law.”
Progressive Americans understand democracy and they want President Obama to repeal the Bill of Rights.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0he0cqHH20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n02qgqtpRKY
Lefties want the old system of Aristocracy where the king grants PRIVILEGES to his favorites and all others are slaves of the king. As I keep on saying Marx was a propagandist for the Aristocracy and Rothschild Central Banksters who were determined to rid society of the middle class ( bourgeoisie) that threatened their privileged status.
** That is the attractiveness for ” the man of science”
KARL MARX
The mentor and role model of Karl Marx was Ludwig von Westphalen. Ludwig, was the youngest son of Baron Christian Philip Heinrich von Westphalen the de facto “chief of staff” to Duke Ferdinand during the Seven Years’ War. His mother was the descendant of many Scottish and European noble families. So Ludwig (later Baron) was well connected to the European aristocracy.
The French Revolution lasted from 1789 until 1799. The Holy Roman Empire, after existing for a thousand years, was dissolved on 6 August 1806, after its defeat by Napoleon at the Battle of Austerlitz. The Napoleonic Wars involving most of Europe was from 1803 to 1815. Defeating Napoleon, the European aristocracy managed to hold onto their way of life by the skin of their teeth.
A year later in 1816 Ludwig von Westphalen was transferred to Trier where he met and befriended Heinrich Marx, the father of Karl Marx. Now why would a well connected nobleman befriend a Jewish businessman/lawyer?
Perhaps because Heinrich Marx, wife’s first cousin married Nathan Rothschild, founder of the British branch of the Rothschild banking dynasty?
Nathan Rothschild funded the Napoleonic Wars.
Nathan Rothschild was executor of Cecil Rhodes will around fifty years later.
It was Ludwig who first introduced Marx to socialist teachings.. Marx’s dissertation was dedicated to Ludwig. Remember Ludwig would have been familiar with the Classics and Plutarch’s account of Ancient Spartan Communism.
I see nothing that makes me think that Marx actually cared for the ‘Masses’ instead I see a giant scam to destroy the middle class and bring the masses back under the control of the elite.
Marx and Engel saw the masses as scum.
Marx an Engels, 14. August 1879
Rah,
I once went out with a lawyer. I forget how we got there, but I ended up making the same point you just made. She literally laughed at the idea. At least according to her, in the current legal system, the ninth amendment has no meaning what so ever. It’s a non-binding and impossibly vague statement of intent, with no purpose beyond soliciting votes for the constitution, and only an idiot could read it as anything else.
I can’t say I’ve ever asked a judge about it, but her description certainly seems to reflect the courts’ interpretations of the ninth amendment.
And no, I never saw her again.
I guess then she would judge me to be “an idiot” because I read it as the law of the land.
Further, I happen to know some history and so know the Federalists were so sure that those many individual rights existed that they didn’t even think that a Bill of Rights was necessary to enumerate ANY OF THEM.
The ONLY ones that needed sold on the Bill of Rights were the Federalists.
Oh BTW you could have embarrassed her and pointed out that the Constitution was ratified BEFORE there was a Bill of Rights. After all they are Amendments!
Well that just proves you ARE an idiot. (as, apparently, am I) I already said she was a lawyer. You can’t embarrass someone who’s entirely without shame.
Sadly, the bill of rights has led to exactly what the antifederalists said it would. With certain rare, politically motivated exceptions, (abortion, homosexual marriage, etc) the enumerated rights are now seen as an exhaustive list. And even those are presumed to be overly broad, and in need of strict constraints.
I think the bill of rights starts off great, but then delves into needless repetition. I would have stopped after the first 5 words.
“Congress shall make no law.”
In truth, there’s been no limit on federal power since Marbury v. Madison. The government granted itself the power to determine the nature and scope of it’s own authority. The war should have started that day.
Obama received a Nobel Prize,and so did Al Gore and Henry Kissinger. He might get a second for the gun thing. The only way that could happen is if money changed hands, ala FIFA World Cup rights or Olympic Games rights.
In case you didn’t want to win a prize, here’s how.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-05/nobel-prize-in-science-how-to-not-win/6821468
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/scienceshow/the-five-most-outrageous-nobel-prizes/5021310
“Obama received a Nobel Prize, and so did Al Gore and Henry Kissinger.”
NO THEY DID NOT.
They received a Nobel Peace Prize.
These are given freely to some of the most wanton, deceitful, low-lifes on the planet.
They are absolutely MEANINGLESS except as a reward to far-left wanjers.
Sorry, Andy, you are wrong. Al Gore received a Nobel Prize, a scientific prize! That’s a big deal! Why are you denying science?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm05Mcah0i8
If you weren’t an Aussie I would say you are almost unpatriotic (1:10).
Perhaps you didn’t know that the Nobel Committee for the Peace Prize has expressed regret for awarding the prize to “the one”.
http://punditfromanotherplanet.com/2015/09/16/nobel-panel-obama-peace-prize-as-mistake/
“The former director of Norway’s Nobel Institute revealed this week that he regrets the committee’s decision to give the 2009 Nobel Peace award to President Obama. “
Brother of Oregon Survivor Wants Obama to ‘Quit Running the Gun Agenda’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1&v=_COhDPkZA-E
America has roughly one privately owned firearm for every man, woman, and child. That’s about 300,000,000 firearms, spread among about 50,000,000 households. About a third of those are handguns, which take up less space than a book, and can be hidden almost anywhere. As an unknowable, but surely significant, number of those firearms have no paper trail leading to the current owner, it’s impossible to say exactly how many there are, or where they are.
Estimates vary more widely on illegal aliens, but their numbers are generally given as between 11,000,000 and 20,000,000. Very few of those people could be hidden in the space needed to hide even the biggest firearm, and not a single one could be hidden within a book sized object. Again, it’s impossible to know the exact number or locations of all illegals.
In both cases, all previous attempts to eradicate either group, without exception, have resulted in massive efforts to hide the objects, or otherwise obstruct said eradication.
The apparent belief of many liberals is that all privately owned firearms can be found, and eliminated, but finding and eliminating illegals is so hopelessly impossible that we’d be fools to try. Looking at the same data, I come to different conclusions.
In my opinion, the only reason we haven’t yet seen large scale confiscation is that it’s one of the few government actions guaranteed to cause a revolution. Something in the American psyche needs to change before confiscation would be allowed. I don’t know what that change would be, or how to bring it about. Thankfully, it doesn’t appear that the government knows, either.
Hey Tony.
Have you seen that your favorite president is now looking at Colorado as a place to open a new GITMO?
http://michellemalkin.com/2015/10/07/gitmo-extended-stay-america-suites-in-colorado-hell-no/