The National Academy of Sciences produced this map, claiming that Texas summers are going to get much hotter. This is in spite of the fact that Texas summers have not warmed for at least 120 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Bob G on Election Results
- Trevor on Election Results
- Greg in NZ on Election Results
- arn on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Bob G on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Gamecock on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Jehzsa on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- D. Boss on “falsely labeling”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
Well, they’re gonna get hotter damnit, because we’re going to change the chart. So they’d better just start shaping up and reporting what we put on our graph!
OT, but speaking of data and cool science stuff, have you seen this, Steve?
http://skysurvey.org/
It’s a 37,440 exposure, 5 gigapixel image of the night sky 🙂
The end is near (less than 70 years). And that does not even take superduperexponential warming into account! Of course, the superduperexponential rate of warming for 0 is 0.