Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
Recent Comments
- Independent on UK Net Zero
- Francis Barnett on Erasing 1921
- william on UK Net Zero
- Robertvd on Erasing 1921
- dearieme on Erasing 1921
- Tel on President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- Bob G on Warming Toledo
- Bob G on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Bob G on Erasing 1921
- Scott Allen on Erasing 1921
Arctic Warmed 10 Degrees Between 1900 And 1947
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“A paper published last month in the journal Climate Dynamics finds that “The Antarctic sea ice extent (SIE) shows an increased trend during 1979–2009, with a trend rate of 1.36 ± 0.43% per decade. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition analysis shows that the rate of the increased trend has been accelerating in the past decade.”
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2011/08/antarctica-sea-ice-shows-accelerating.html
couldn’t have happened….it was before 1950…
Nope. More like 5.6F from c1902 to c 1943.
This is what real science as opposed to newspaper clippings has to say:
http://forces.si.edu/arctic/pdf/ACT%203_ARCTIC%20HEAT%20WAVE.pdf
Please notice the Global Temperatures for the same period.
Which satellite are you using?
Correction on the above.
“More like 5.6F from c1902 to c 1943.”
The above implies a trend but there is no trend; only a comparison between 2 years. Therefore, my statement above should be corrected to:
“More like 5.6F when the year c1902 is compared to c1943”
For an actual trend between 1900 and 1940; as well as 1900 through the present, see the link below.
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/mean:1/plot/hadcrut3vgl/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1900/to:1940/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1900/to:2011/trend
That WFT link is a global trend. Up to this point the focus of this post has been on Arctic temps.
It’s a shame that some people just can’t seem to grasp the difference between the Arctic and the entire globe. Why it seems like only last week we were being lectured that North America isn’t the globe when it turned out that the weather patterns in North America weren’t going through any unusual disruption. You would almost think it was an elaborate joke if it turned out that the same person also couldn’t distinguish fiction from non-fiction.
J Calvert; I forgot to add this:
http://www.arcus.org/arcss/sass/sass1projects/downloads/4_Rigor_03.06.ppt#282,4,Slide 4
http://www.lanceandeskimo.com/paul/skeletor.ppt