In science, if you don’t like the data – simply throw it away and blame it on human interference in the climate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Deniers of the MWP.
But, but, but, treeometers and thermometers correlate!!! ……… except when they don’t.
Boy, if ever a blog title was spot-on….LOL
“Case closed” In their dreams maybe.
I’ve been vindicated, OJ Simpson October 3, 1995
Phil Plait is now openly getting his cues from PR site DeSmogBlog. How telling.
Criminals all.
Or as someone else said …
Crimatologists
He argues that there was nothing interesting about climategate. He’s probably right. In all fields of science the scientists mess with peer-review, adjust data, form back-scratching relationships, and generally make sure that the results go the way they want them to. That’s why they don’t find climategate interesting.
Those of us with somewhat more naive views were quite disappointed to find that all science, astronomy (how do you corrupt astronomy???) is just as bad as climate science.