Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- dearieme on “even within the lifetime of our children”
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
Off Topic
Obama now claims his mother was not married when he was born:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/obama-changes-his-story-born-to-a-single-mom/?cat_orig=us
For the past 12 years the MSM appears to have reported on global warming/climate change/climate wierding in a political science argument VS a geo-physical argument (Hence the publics understanding or lack thereof).
It would seem those with high IQ’s tend not to migrate to journalism.
If you understand the CO2 feedback/amplification factor of X3, GREAT, if not, find out what the argument is about.
If you do find out what the true argument is, you’ll also understand why climatologists will not and have not debated the subject!
Also, take note of the tropospheric height driven jet stream at the poles (much lower, wouldn’t you know) and the tropospheric elemental constituents (all of them) as they make they way higher.
What are the carbon dioxide levels at 800hPa, 500hPA, 300hPa, right on up to 10hPA levels?
What do the experts know about argon and the rest of the elemental constituents, their interactions with each other and EMF at height throughout the troposphere and above?
Ask Trenberth why he gave up his studies in the great atmospheric chemical domain a few years ago…
Isn’t it time for public to get a crash course on electromagnetic radiation (The full spectrum) and physical-chemical reactions & processes within our troposphere?
There is guesswork and then there’s bullshit, unfortunately the majority of the public get a lot of the BS!
Too much irrigation.