51% Growth In Thick Arctic Ice Over Last Year

The light green below shows the growth of one metre thick ice over this date last year. There is 51% greater coverage of thick ice compared to last year, and the new ice is perfectly located in the western Arctic to survive the winter and thicken. The news couldn’t possibly be worse for climate scamsters.

ScreenHunter_1737 Oct. 22 08.26

ictn2012102118_2012102200_035_arcticictn.001.gif (740×666)

ictn2013102118_2013102200_038_arcticictn.001.gif (740×666)

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to 51% Growth In Thick Arctic Ice Over Last Year

  1. Jimmy Haigh says:

    Funny buggers, warm-mongers. They were crying because the ice was melting. And now they are crying even more because it is freezing again. Morons.

  2. X says:

    Beautiful!! Perfectl!! 🙂

  3. Mohatdebos says:

    As of Sept 30th, 40 ships had journeyed across the Northern Sea Route (Northeast Passage), which is fewer than last year. More important, it is less than a fifth of the number granted permission to make the journey. So much for how a melting arctic would open up a new route from Asia to Western Europe. It must be an oversight that MSM has failed to report this development.

  4. Crashex says:

    It’s the dreaded “tipping point” they have been forecasting.

  5. tom0mason says:

    Hurray!!!
    There’s more ice at the Arctic
    🙂
    Hurray!!!
    There’s more ice at the Antarctic.
    🙂
    Hurray!!!

    More people to die of cold in NH winter!?
    🙁

    • haberdasher says:

      My “Hope” is that America can produce cheap gas and electricity for American’s in America. I wish for a “Change” in our President and his cronies stance on production of cheap energy in America. Unfortunately, generally retired Americans are the people who are forced to make a decision on whether to heat their house or buy food to eat.

  6. Alec, aka daffy duck says:

    This specifically something I’ been following. I hope you will update the graphic for November 7, half way between the equinox and solstice
    http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/navo/arcticict/nowcast/ict2012110918_2012110700_035_arcticict.001.gif

    And then again at the http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/navo/arcticict/nowcast/ict2012122418_2012122200_035_arcticict.001.gif

  7. Henry says:

    pet peeve, I don’t think it should be called the western” Arctic. Looking at the pole from Siberia the west becomes the east. I would call it “Pacific-side” Arctic, or something. Of course I could be wrong.

    • Stewart Pid says:

      Likely western arctic is just convention from the days of Henry Hudson or Franklin etc since they all sailed west from England … if they went the other way it was the eastern arctic. I’m just guessing on this but there is no reason to establish a new metric Arctic naming convention IMHO. metric is sarc obviously.

    • Jason Calley says:

      If the Japanese had beaten the British at being the first to establish a global reference for longitude, then yes, the Siberian Arctic would be the Western Arctic, and the Alaska-Canadian Arctic would be the East Arctic.

    • gator69 says:

      What are you thoughts on “Greenland”? 😉

  8. Me Here says:

    So 2x pretty coloured badly sized pictures ….. with no supporting references of scientific evidence means global warming is a scam ??? ….. you people obviously believe in invisible sky wizards too I bet …… some of these sites make me laugh so much…. thanks

  9. Ed says:

    Poor warmists: They are forced to hope for the very thing they claim to be worried about, lest they end up looking like c*nts.

  10. Wonderful. Once the maximum of solar cycle 24 ends (soon) then the temperature decline should be much more definitive.

  11. Gary H says:

    Naw . . I think that this time Steven is “just having more fun than usual.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *