Real Climate Science

My corrections for the Boulder Daily Camera article below :

“Colorado’s loss is the world’s gain,” said Governor John Hickenlooper

Colorado’s gain is France’s loss, said those wanting to drain the climate swamp

According to Science, the climate grants specifically target “disgruntled” U.S. scientists seeking refuge from the climate change skepticism of the current administration, but are open to climate scientists around the world

the climate grants specifically target climate alarmists and are not open to anyone who promotes factual information about climate. Climate science can’t handle dissent or debate.

Excellent news!  Five of the thirteen climate scientists moving to France are neighbors.

Four Boulder climate scientists taking their research to France – Boulder Daily Camera

One of the lucky winners is Ben Sanderson of NCAR

Ben actually wrote a paper rejecting low climate sensitivity.

Can we now rule out a low climate sensitivity? BM Sanderson, C. Tebaldi in review, Nature Communications

Despite the fact that all available tropospheric data indicates models are much too aggressive.

STILL Epic Fail: 73 Climate Models vs. Measurements, Running 5-Year Means « Roy Spencer, PhD

Five less Colorado scientists who are simply “making stuff up.”  Hopefully the federal budget won’t allocate money for replacements.

According to the National Interagency Fire Center, 9.4 million acres burned in the US this year. This is down 80% since the 1930’s.

Indicator 3.16: Area and percent of forest affected by abiotic agents

23 Jul 1933, Page 12 – Great Falls Tribune at Newspapers.com

TimesMachine: October 9, 1938 – NYTimes.com

And forest fires are down 90% since CO2 was at pre-industrial levels – when an area larger than the state of California burned every year.

Fire Policy – Cover & TOC

There is no correlation between forest fires and atmospheric CO2 – but excellent correlation between fires and extreme heat = which peaked in the 1930’s.

Rather than doing actual science, government climate scientists prefer to alter data to match their worthless models.

Arctic sea ice volume is up 15% from a decade ago, and the area of the Arctic covered with thick ice has massively expanded .

2007   2017

Summer minimum ice extent has increased over the past decade.

masie_4km_allyears_extent_sqkm.csv

Greenland’s surface has been gaining ice at near record rates for the last two years.

https://www.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/

NOAA mysteriously forgot to mention that Arctic ice is expanding in their Arctic Report Card.

2017 Headlines

These people are propagandists, not scientists – and their scam is collapsing.

The Arctic as it is known today is almost certainly gone

Expert: Arctic polar cap may disappear this summer_English_Xinhua

North Pole May Be Ice-Free for First Time This Summer

Star-News – Google News Archive Search

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Arctic summers ice-free ‘by 2013’

Gore: Polar ice cap may disappear by summer 2014

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

Scientists say that the UK can run on “wind, water and solar” by the year 2050.

Nearly 140 countries could be powered entirely by wind, solar and water by 2050 | The Independent

Let’s look and see if their claim makes any sense. On November 2, 2017 the UK generated almost no wind power, and very little solar power – on a day when demand was quite high. The country was almost entirely dependent on fossil fuels and nuclear power.

Live monitoring of the UK electricity National Grid

What caused this?  There was almost no wind, and very little sun.  Had the UK relied on wind, solar and water power that day, people would have been dark, cold, hungry and cut off from all communications.

The law of conservation of energy tells us that you can’t create energy from nothing, no matter how many times climate scientists imagine they can do it. This is why we have engineers to design the grid. Most scientists have never done anything practical in their lives, never developed a product, and believe that any idea which pops into their head must be true.

You wouldn’t trust a climate scientist to do brain surgery or make a climate forecast. Why would you trust them with your children’s future?  They are a bunch of incompetent. scientific hacks – not engineers. They don’t have the skills necessary to make this sort of determination.

Twenty-five years ago, climate experts predicted the demise of the Great Lakes.

12 Feb 1992, Page 7 – Star Tribune at Newspapers.com

There has been no change in Great Lakes water levels over the past century.

Great Lakes Dashboard – HTML5

The evidence is overwhelming that climate science is superstition – not science.