I took all of these pictures on my bicycle commute today.
Democrats on the Boulder City Council want to destroy this habitat and open space, in exchange for virtue signaling that they can alter the world’s climate. The stupidity and ignorance is beyond breathtaking. The global warming scam has co-opted the left into becoming the environment’s #1 enemy.
Boulder needs this. We don’t need to become just another crap suburb of Denver.
On this date in 1936, the south was devastated by tornadoes which killed hundreds of people in six states.
07 Apr 1936 – TORNADO TAKES 200 LIVES
A few weeks later, thousands were dying in unprecedented heat.
The Bulletin – Google News Archive Search
No other summer compared with 1936 for heat.
On July 14, 1936 much of the midwest was over 110 degrees, including 113 degrees in Wisconsin. These sort of temperatures are incomprehensible now.
This question changes minds on global warming – CNNPolitics.com
Fake news CNN says there is a near consensus that burning fossil fuels is the primary driver of global warming. The “near consensus” is actually a whopping 52%.
?journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00091.1
And what if Scott Pruitt is wrong? What are the consequences? Absolutely nothing. Under the agreement made by Obama, China controls global CO2 emissions, not the US.
Climate Goals Pledged by China and the U.S. – The New York Times
On the other hand, what if greens are wrong about fake green power? What if energy becomes unreliable and expensive? That would be catastrophic. Is Boulder, Colorado going to be happy not having electricity four days a week?
Greens are dangerously stupid people who threaten our very survival. They need to be called out and humiliated.
A nesting pair of hawks in open space wetlands near my apartment, which City of Boulder greens want to destroy in order to pretend they are saving the planet from global warming.
Another useless confirmation bias based government agency bites the dust.
Historical CO2 Records from the Law Dome DE08, DE08-2, and DSS Ice Cores
Five years ago this week, our crack government funded climate fraudsters announced that global warming reduces life expectancy.
First study to examine long-term effects of climate change on life expectancy
Actual data shows that life expectancy is steadily increasing, and rises linearly with increasing CO2.
Life Expectancy – Our World In Data
Whatever government climate scientists say, it is normally safe to assume that the exact opposite is true. Old people move to the Arizona desert because they like the heat.
Less than year after fake news New York Times and fake governor Jerry Brown announced the California permanent drought, California is having their wettest year on record.
California Braces for Unending Drought – The New York Times
Lots more permanent drought on the way.
Progressives believe humans are evil, so all bad weather must be our fault. That is the extent of their understanding of science.
Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology hides the January 1896 heatwave, because they say measurement techniques exaggerated afternoon temperatures by 1C.
In 1887, Todd set up what must be one of the longest-running scientific experiments ever, when he installed thermometers in a Stevenson Screen and on a Glaisher Stand at Adelaide Observatory (as seen in the illustration here). Observations were taken in both exposures until 1948.
The results of this 61-year experiment show that summer daytime temperatures measured using the Glaisher Stand are, on average, 1C warmer than in the Stevenson Screen.
You will find that, after the adjustments they make to the data (to ensure the early data can be reliably compared with modern data), some years in the 19th century were indeed warm. But nothing like the heat we endured across the country in 2013.
According to Berkeley Earth, the Australian average daily maximum temperature in January 1896 was about 1C hotter than the 1951-80 January average. But January 2013 was a full 1.5C hotter again – really, the late 19th century temperatures don’t come close to modern extremes.
That’s why the Bureau’s official temperature records start in 1910 – before that date we have good grounds for believing that the data are poor and biased (and would be difficult to adjust for the many problems).
I tested out their theory by comparing the 1896 heatwave vs. the 2013 heatwave. Even after subtracting 1C from the 1896 temperatures, 1896 was still 2C hotter than 2013. In 1896 they had weeks of extremely hot weather, whereas in 2013 they only had a small handful of hot days.
Nighttime temperatures were also 2C hotter in 1896 than 2013. Nighttime temperatures aren’t affected by stand type. Ignoring the 1896 heatwave is malfeasance, not science.
January 1896 was incredibly hot. BOM is hiding it because it wrecks their global warming scam.
TimesMachine: August 18, 1896 – NYTimes.com
Summers in Australia used to be much hotter. There is no indication of a step change at Bourke correlating to a change in stand type. There is no justification for throwing out pre-1910 temperatures.
But the story gets worse. BOM is more than happy to use garbage UHI afflicted thermometers like this one in Melbourne, which probably report 3-5C too high.
Global warming is the biggest scam in science history, and government agencies use every excuse in the book to hide inconvenient data.
