Real Climate Science

My incredible mother passed on to her next adventure last week.

One of my favorite memories of her was around 1972, the fake news Guardian wrote a hit piece on Los Alamos in which the Guardian said the first atomic bomb was detonated there.  My mother responded with a letter to the editor saying something to the effect of “I have lived in Los Alamos a long time, and don’t remember seeing any nuclear weapons going off. I think I would have noticed.”

I haven’t been able to find that article, but I did locate this idiotic 1976 Guardian hit piece on Los Alamos. My mother loved Los Alamos, which is an incredibly beautiful place full of great people.

City of deadly secrets

Early in life I had noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper.

• George Orwell

This is the actual Los Alamos

I have continued the family tradition of calling out Guardian fake news. Below are some of my favorites.

Arrhenius was pimping solar power in 1925, because Earth would run out of oil during the current generation. More fake news from the Guardian.

POWER FROM SUN

The latest scam is claiming that Antarctica is warming very fast.

Global Warming: Antarctica Has Warmed Much More Than Earth Average : Science : iTech Post

Even top climate fraudster Gavin Schmidt knows that Antarctica is not warming.

Pubs.GISS: Abstract of Shindell and Schmidt 2004

Fake climate news is the new normal among journalists. Antarctica is cooling, not warming,

MSU_AMSU_Channel_tlt_Trend_Map_v03_3_1979_2015.730_450.png (730×450)

Peter Hannam recently wrote one of the worst fake climate news articles ever for the Canberra Times about the Arctic, and is now doing a repeat for SMH at both poles. His first major mistake is claiming low November Arctic sea ice extent is causing sunlight to be absorbed in the Arctic Ocean.

‘Remarkable year’: What’s behind the record low sea ice in Antarctica

If Peter actually knew anything about the earth, he would know that the sun doesn’t shine in the Arctic in November – and open water in the Arctic Ocean in November allows heat to escape to the much colder air.

But it gets worse. Peter also appears to be trying to fool his readers into believing a hole in Antarctic sea ice may also be due to global warming. Note the not very subtle placement of the words “clarion call of global warming” next to the Antarctic sea ice graph above. Nothing in his article supports that idea, but his intent to lead the reader towards that conclusion is clear.

Here is the latest satellite map of Antarctic sea ice, showing a large hole in the ice.

S_daily_extent.png (420×500)

The same hole in the ice appeared from 1974-1976 at the peak of the ice age scare.

Nimbus’ 40th Anniversary : Feature Articles

In January of 1976, Antarctic sea ice almost completely disappeared.

National Geographic : 1976 Nov, Page 578

At that time, the Canberra Times was pimping global cooling and the ice age scare.

22 Nov 1974 – SCIENCE DOCUMENTARY New ice age ‘could be in our lifetime’

31 May 1975

Antarctic sea ice extent has nothing to do with either fake global cooling scares or fake global warming scares. The ice behaves the same during both. But Peter Hannam gets readers by writing fake climate news articles for the Australian press.

In 1901, Knut Angstrom showed that Arrhenius didn’t know what he was talking about with his global warming theories. CO2 absorption is already nearly saturated, so additional increases in CO2 have little effect.

Arrhenius also ignored H2O in his calculations, which produces most of the greenhouse effect. As a result of his “inadmissable” error, Arrhenius overestimated the effects of CO2 by about 96%.

mwr-029-06-0268a.pdf

Global land temperatures have dropped 1.2C since February, the largest drop in more than a century.

www.woodfortrees.org/data/crutem4vgl/from:1906

The Guardian calls record global cooling “incredibly fast heating” And they call fake news real news.

Fake news tries to blame human-caused global warming on El Niño | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | The Guardian

Fun things you can do with a 320X zoom camera.

I generated this graph on November 16, 2016. Note that all three lines intersected at the year 2000.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

In today’s version of the same graph, Gavin’s fraudulent green line has been pushed up even further. It is now above the satellite data at the year 2000.

The overlay below shows how Gavin has bumped up his fake data even higher than last month.

This follow a continuing pattern of Gavin tampering with temperature data month after month, which has caused global warming to nearly triple since the year 2000 – during a time when satellites show little or no warming.

Data.GISS: GISTEMP HISTORY

Gavin is a major player in the biggest science fraud in history.

Gavin tweeted this feeble attempt yesterday to blow off my criticisms.

He didn’t want to update it, so I updated it for him. His graph has completely removed the 0.5C cooling from 1940 to 1970.  That is the first half of his fraud.

NAS 1975           NASA 2016

Next comes the part of his fraud which he says “pseudo-skeptics don’t want you to pay attention to”  i.e. the post-1970 hockey stick. I’ve been paying attention to that for years, and he has blocked me and ignored it. The upper half of Gavin’s graph is even worse than the lower half. He shows a huge amount of warming since 2000, which has simply not occurred.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

So what does a realistic global temperature graph look like? I combined the satellite graph with the 1975 NAS graph, and used Gavin’s 0.2C warming from 1970 to 1979 to normalize the two graphs. That is undoubtedly too much warming, but I will use it for the sake of argument. What we see is there was 0.5C warming from 1880 to 1940, and only 0.2C additional warming since 1940.

Gavin is a key player in the largest scientific fraud in history. There is no legitimate evidence that CO2 has any meaningful impact on the temperature record. Gavin has been doing Obama’s dirty work, like any other political appointee. He has not been behaving like a scientist.

Jerry Brown has spent $70 billion on a train to nowhere, because he believes a train can end thousands of years of cyclical California drought.

California drought : San Jose Mercury New

But he has spent nothing installing sprinklers in nightclubs.