Real Climate Science

Fifty years ago, there was unanimous consensus that the planet was getting colder.

SCIENTISTS AGREE WORLD IS COLDER – – NYTimes.com

This cooling didn’t suit the political agenda of the White House, so NASA simply made it disappear.

45 years ago, scientists wanted to ban fossil fuels to prevent a new ice age and flooding of coastal cities.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/

The usual criminals in the press corps are claiming that Arctic ice is rapidly disappearing, and at a record low extent.

Satellite imagery shows that there is a lot more ice and snow than there was in 2006. (Note that the eye altitude has changed since 2006, but I aligned the land edges as closely as possible.)

Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

2006 was the year with the highest summer minimum from the past decade, and ice levels are well above 2006.

The press has manged to spin a decadal increase in ice extent into a “record low.”  This is how journalists working for the $29 billion climate mafia operate. Arctic sea ice has been stable for three years, and there is no trend over the past decade.

arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.anom.1979-2008

Nine years ago, The New York Times announced that your SUV brought endless summer to Long Island, and was killing Polar Bears

gardens alone can’t save the polar bears, or all the other species that could vanish. Only a radical reduction in the burning of fossil fuels can do that.

With Warmer Weather, Different Decisions to Make – New York Times

The past three months have obliterated all records for cold in the Northeast

And there is more sea ice than there was in 2006

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

The New York Times was 100% wrong on all counts, and they predictably responded by censoring all heretics to their religion.

Tom Nelson has been booted off twitter for using the same word Gavin did.

Today, April 1, Twitter informed me that my account was “locked” until I deleted this tweet:

This is the first year on record when cherry blossom florets were not active in Washington DC during March.

Bloom Watch | National Cherry Blossom Festival

Three years ago, scientists predicted cherry blossom florets in January.

Could cherry blossoms one day be blooming in winter? – The Washington Post

Every day is April Fools Day in government funded climate science.

The White House on Tuesday rebuked Republican critics of its contribution to the United Nations climate pact, saying the criticisms are “hard to take seriously.”

Asked about congressional Republicans who want the Senate to have to approve an agreement, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that politicians who are skeptical of the science surrounding climate change are not qualified to judge the matter.

“These are individuals who — many of whom, at least, deny the fact that climate change even exists, so I’m not sure they would be in the best position to decide whether or not a climate- change agreement is one that is worth entering into,” Earnest told reporters Tuesday.

White House: GOP criticism of climate pact ‘hard to take seriously’ | TheHill

On April Fools day, there are still people who deny that we are watching a coup d’etat unfolding right under our noses.

[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur

– Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution

One problem which climate experts suffer from, is poor messaging. I’m happy to offer my services to improve their ability to reach the public.

My $0.00 in big oil/tobacco/Koch funding was recently cut off, so I am actively seeking my cut of the $29 billion/year in government climate scam money. Others are getting more than their fair share, and we all believe in redistribution of wealth now.

If you need any fake global warming studies done or simply want me to stop denying that Manhattan is underwater, please contact my secretary Jenny at 867-5309

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.

Does he still believe these things?

Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.

Stormy weather – Salon.com