Why do you massively tamper with the temperature data, and turn a cooling trend into a warming trend?
You can’t use the raw surface data. It is a mess, affected by station moves, TOBS, different types of thermometers, missing data, etc. It needs large adjustments to be meaningful
Sounds bad – why not just use modern satellite data instead? It has much better coverage.
Satellite data has problems, and needs to be adjusted. The surface data is our most reliable data source.
// C++ climate model
while (funding_exists)
{
const bool climate_crisis = true;
warming_cooling = !warming_cooling;
sleep30years();
}
Record cold and snow in the East, Heavy rain headed to California. Southeast Australia experiencing record summer cold. Bitter cold in Europe. Alaska in the deep freeze.
But Colorado is warm, so look for alarmists to turn their attention that direction.
In 1960, scientists explained how global warming made the Antarctic ice sheet grow.
Now scientists explain that global warming makes the Antarctic ice sheet shrink.
Satellites measure Antarctica is … losing land ice at an accelerating rate which has implications for sea level rise.
the ice sheets are sensitive to warming temperatures and are going to cause significant sea level rise over this century (and beyond).
Global warming is truly amazing, in that it can simultaneously produce all possible outcomes.
With two feet of snow, followed by record cold, it is the perfect time for Northeastern progressives to divest fully from fossil fuels.
Solar panels are an awesome option when you get six hours of sunlight a day , the solar panels are buried in snow, and the temperature is below zero F.
So go for it progressives. Show us that you aren’t just the world class hypocrites you pretend to be.
Gavin created the fastest warming place on Earth in the Arctic, primarily with imaginary data. Note that the 2-4C warming red area inside the oval is almost entirely fabricated from gray “missing data”
1200 km Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
250 km : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
If we look closer at 250 km plot, we can see that regions of the 2-4C area were actually measured as blue – meaning they were cooling, not warming
Same thing in the Eastern Arctic
So basically, Gavin and Tom make up fake raw +4C data, extrapolate it out into regions which have no data, ignore the cooling regions, and report to the press a record temperature by 0.02 degrees.
The reason why NASA/NCDC surface data doesn’t match satellite data, is because their surface data is fraudulent
Can science get any worse than this?
Paul Homewood has located another winner in South America
2014 : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
2012 : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
Gavin says that region is warming really quickly, because he is just making the data up as he goes along.
Sea level rise rates have been constant for a century. Contrary to the fraudulent claims made by Obama in the State of The Union address, there has been no acceleration in sea level rise rates.
There is no correlation between atmospheric CO2 and sea level rise rates. They have nothing to do with each other.
With the Northeast facing up to two feet of snow this week, the Union of Concerned Scientists has this 100% fraudulent document on their web site
Across the Northeast, from Pennsylvania and New Jersey northward to Maine, signs of our rapidly changing climate
become clearer each year. Records show that spring is arriving sooner, summers are growing hotter, and winters are becoming warmer and less snowy
Annual snowfall in the Northeast has been close to the long term mean of 100 cm in recent years
The percentage of 100 degree days has plummeted in the Northeast over the past 120 years.
The “Union of Concerned Scientists” is committing fraud, yet again.
