Not only is everything else about the graph fraudulent, but it turns out that Dana ‘s claimed Lindzen forecast is also a fake.
Does anyone have any idea where the curve attributed to me came from? I don’t do forecasts.
Dick
Not only is everything else about the graph fraudulent, but it turns out that Dana ‘s claimed Lindzen forecast is also a fake.
Does anyone have any idea where the curve attributed to me came from? I don’t do forecasts.
Dick
Dave Burton found another CIA paper from 1974 :
documents.theblackvault.com/documents/environment/potentialtrends.pdf
They blamed dips in the polar vortex on Arctic cooling, unlike the current administration – which thinks cold is caused by heat, debt is wealth, liabilities are assets, and being on the government dole is prosperity.
Check out this crock of lies from Peter Sinclair.
He made up fake numbers for every line in his graph, didn’t normalize the non-existent Lindzen forecast. and used the wrong Hansen scenario.
Hansen’s forecast was a complete disaster, and the claimed Lindzen forecast is a fraud constructed by Nuttercelli.
Graph below shows GISS in red, overlaid on Hansen’s 1988 forecasts.
Having the 1975 NAS report in hand completely disarms alarmists. Thanks Dave!
https://ia801806.us.archive.org/7/items/understandingcli00unit/understandingcli00unit.pdf
It also provides a smoking gun that Mann had no legitimate reason to delete Briffa’s trees, which precisely matched the NAS graph.
http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/26/the-deleted-portion-of-the-briffa-reconstruction/ …
NOAA has to massively cool Ohio’s past, because prior to 1955 it was very hot there. This simply doesn’t suit the global warming political narrative which NOAA is required to support.
Ohio temperatures peaked in 1921, and have been on along term decline since 1895. NOAA hides this decline by massively cooling the past, and massively warming the present.
UHI causes temperatures to rise as suburban sprawl spreads. NOAA and NASA have responded by making massive adjustments in the wrong direction.
Science – Cities Make Their Own Weather – View Article – NYTimes.com
Sometimes when you are a government scientist saving the planet, you just have to commit massive scientific fraud.