Real Climate Science

The Canberra Times – 17 February 1961

Why Climates  Everywhere  Are Changing

NEW YORK (Associated Press). — What strange concert of forces is at work, changing the earth’s climate?  Experts pondered that question and suggested possible culprits ranging from carbon dioxide to sunspots to the earth’s magnetism.

17 Feb 1961 – Why Climates Everywhere Are Changing

CARBONIC ACID AS A FERTILISER

1 December 1923

01 Dec 1923 – CARBONIC ACIDAS A FERTILISER

Not only are Democrats lying about everything, but they are cheating too.

“The nuclear option abandons America’s sense of fair play .?.?. tilting the playing field on the side of those who control and own the field. I say to my friends on the Republican side: You may own the field right now, but you won’t own it forever. I pray God when the Democrats take back control, we don’t make the kind of naked power grab you are doing.”

Joe Biden – 2005

Dana Milbank: The Democrats’ naked power grab – The Washington Post

Someone break the news to Mikey. Ninety years ago, scientists actually did science.

WORLD’S GREATEST PROBLEM.

Dr. Riedel con ceived the idea of speeding up the growth of plants by giving them extra supplies of carbon dioxide

Tomatoes in the greenhouse supplied with gas weighed 175 per cent, more than in the other houses, and cucumbers show ed increase of 70 per cent.

17 Mar 1922 – WORLD’S GREATEST PROBLEM. Agricultural Science. …

Fifty years since Kennedy was assassinated in ……. Texas

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJIb73SPzkE]

Wednesday 6 May 1953

“The carbon dioxide in the air acts in the same manner   as the glass in a greenhouse,” Dr. Plass said.

06 May 1953 – INDUSTRIAL GAS EARTH’S “GREENHOUSE” Australian A…

I’m watching Russia Today on television in Mexico.

They say that fracking involves pumping radioactive liquids into the water supply, and releasing dangerous greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

Global temperatures have declined since 1997, while CO2 has increased exponentially -proving that the Kyoto protocol worked.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

A few weeks ago, the “facts only” LA Times announced that New Mexico would never recover from a drought they were having.

www.skitaos.org/webcams

When Clinton was president, NYT disliked the filibuster. When Bush was president, they liked the filibuster.

March 29, 2005

A decade ago, this page expressed support for tactics that would have gone even further than the “nuclear option” in eliminating the power of the filibuster. At the time, we had vivid memories of the difficulty that Senate Republicans had given much of Bill Clinton’s early agenda. But we were still wrong. To see the filibuster fully, it’s obviously a good idea to have to live on both sides of it. We hope acknowledging our own error may remind some wavering Republican senators that someday they, too, will be on the other side and in need of all the protections the Senate rules can provide.

The New York Times > Opinion > Editorial: Walking in the Opposition’s Shoes

Now that Obama is president, they don’t like the filibuster.

Democracy Returns to the Senate

In a 52-to-48 vote that substantially altered the balance of power in Washington, the Senate changed its most infuriating rule and effectively ended the filibuster on executive and judicial appointments. From now on, if any senator tries to filibuster a presidential nominee, that filibuster can be stopped with a simple majority, not the 60-vote requirement of the past

Democracy Returns to the Senate – NYTimes.com

The New York Times also says that Obama mis-spoke about keeping your healthcare plan.