For the first time in my life, I am proud of Russia – for bringing a little sanity to a world which Barack Obama is driving insane.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYY73RO_egw]
Yes, hope is making a comeback. We are hoping that Obama will go off on a three year long golfing vacation with his choom buddies.
This one was a little bit too easy …
No Arctic warming for the past eight years, as CO2 has soared past 400 PPM.
My wife is a Russian refugee from the Soviet Union, and I know how Russians think.
My guess is that Putin will make an offer to have Syria give up their chemical weapons, in exchange for the White House ending their financial and military support of the terrorists who are prosecuting the war in Syria.
This will put Obama in an untenable position, and he will probably have a nervous breakdown.
Russians are not crippled by the PC emotional baggage which most Americans have been subject to since they were toddlers. They also are great chess players. They look many moves ahead, and anticipate what their opponent is going to do.
Alarmists like Nuttercelli are hiding behind what they call “the long term trend” in Arctic ice, as a way to avoid a serious discussion about the 60% increase in ice this year.
The first thing to note is that NSIDC starts their graph at the century maximum in 1979. In the early 1970s, sea ice was much less extensive than later in the decade. If NSIDC included the entire satellite record in their graph, it would look like a sine wave, not a straight line.
www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
Another important issue is that plotting linear trends on short sections of a cyclical function – is junk science and mathematics. Even if August ice was at an all-time record high, the post-1979 linear trend would still be down, as shown in the demonstration purposes only graph below.
Temperatures always move in one direction from July-January. Would anyone be stupid enough to extrapolate January-July temperatures based on the July-January slope?
OBAMA: Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job. But she works for me. I’m the president and I’m always responsible, and that’s why nobody’s more interested in finding out exactly what happened than I do.
The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people in the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we’re going to hunt down those who committed this crime.
And then a few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with the families.
And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, governor, is offensive. That’s not what we do. That’s not what I do as president, that’s not what I do as Commander in Chief.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs]
I’m not convinced that the White House has considered all the options yet for who is responsible for the Syria attack. It may have been a spontaneous YouTube protest, workplace violence, or most likely Tea Party members angry about tax day.
Susan Rice, Candy Crowley and Hillary Clinton should be able to sort all this out for us, as they have done so effectively in the past.
One approach the White House could take is to ask “At this point, what difference does it make?” blackmail all the witnesses, and simply call the whole thing off.
Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts.
The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 to President Barack Obama – Press Release
